2007/8/26, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:

Hi Ines,

most of it looks reasonable, although it's always hard to tell from
slices without being able to scroll back and forth. The superior stuff
that is excluded looks like dura, but I'd need to be able to see the whole
volume to tell. The regions that doesn't look so good is the collatarel
sulcus. Is there missing wm there? If so, adding control points could help.

Bruce

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Inês Souta wrote:

> Here they are.
>
> 2007/8/26, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
>>
>> Hi Ines,
>>
>> it's hard to tell anything from these images. Can you change the window
>> levels a bit? Try setting the brightness to .5 or so.
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007,
>> Inês Souta wrote:
>>
>>> Sure.
>>>
>>> Here goes two snapshots of two different slices of the coronal view and
>> one
>>> form the horizontal view.
>>>
>>> 2007/8/26, Bruce Fischl < fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
>>>>
>>>> can you send us an image or two?
>>>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Inês Souta wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>
>>>>> I need to edit the pial surface. It isn't getting out far enough all
>>>> over
>>>>> the cortex. I'm sure it is not a skull stripping problem. Do I need to
>>>> add
>>>>> control points everywhere in order to correct this? Isn't there
>> another
>>>> way?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Ines
>>>>>
>>>
>