I should mention that the aseg file captures the GM outside the pial surface.

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Corinna Bauer <corinnab83@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, Bruce.
In an earlier thread from '09 with a similar problem (https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/2009-May/010554.html), it was mentioned that there was a method being developed to edit the surface mesh. Is that option still available and would it help? Since this step in our analysis stream is central to everything else, we are willing to try whatever it takes.

Corinna

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Sorry Corinna

I meant to answer this the first time but it slipped through the cracks.
I doubt there is much you can do if there is that big a lesion. If the
topology is wrong and you can't see tissue in those regions it's going to
be very hard
Bruce


On Wed, 10 Feb 2016,
Corinna Bauer wrote:

> Dear Experts,
>
> I have a subject with severe atrophy in bilateral frontal and parietal
> regions and after many rounds of edits to the brainmask, wm.mgz, and control
> points, these regions are still left uncaptured. Is there a way to edit the
> pial surface to include these grey matter regions? I am hesitant to draw
> them in via the wm surface since there is no definite WM present.
>
> I do have a FLAIR also on this subject.
>
> I've attached a couple examples.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Corinna
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.