I'm not sure what you did or how to interpret that pic. If I understand, you ran a case through recon-all and created labels on that case. You then recon-all again using a totally different output where you improved the homogeneity. You now want to map the labels you created on the 1st run to the 2nd run. Is that right?

On 10/22/2021 4:58 PM, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution        

        External Email - Use Caution        

Hi there

I created labels on surfaces of subjects (chimp) registered to a particular volumetric template. The labels were created on the surfaces in Freeview using Freesurfer 7.1.

Since creating these labels, I improved the intensity inhomogeneity in the scans and re-ran the surfaces. When I try to use mri_label2label to transpose the labels to the new surfaces of each subject, the labels do not fall exactly where they should. In fact, the surfaces themselves have a slight translation in them (see snapshot). I assume this is because my registration to the template that I did prior to running recon-all is differing somehow between the 2 groups. However, I thought that this should not matter since mri_label2label --regmethod surface is using the sphere.reg to fsaverage.

I am wondering if there is anything I can do to improve mri_label2label to avoid editing the labels manually?

Thank you for your time,
Trisanna

--

Trisanna Sprung-Much, PhD
Research Associate
McGill University
Montreal Neurological Institute

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1q5tLeMBonQ68z0n88Yl920FIxC8aFXA_OZHvYSqEM50UX8s4FGTQ1V9b-0sOZqrMzD2RFa8j8VA15UrIBW1Cx47shJhrO0mwe2eZ5tfElgapHyTJnagGaRkvLI__DZXTdukNA5VS31AFk-5wWCSo33jYVD3KgJyOQQ1y6izGw9MX7jYMcZt3F1KxtOTm06nCR-Ob_1I7CQJPBqseZH8_Vx40yyhGMGaljY_37YesT-QjACDXDd_RRdKCwDXhxEOL46Vmv9vOIYiJRKrXrQ8bbQ/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer