Hi Bruce,

I've heard people saying that FS 5.3 is focusing on better output for cortical thickness and that I should use 5.0 for subcortical segmentation because it's better. Does that make sense?

Thanks!
Mihaela

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Mihaela Stefan <mikaelastephan@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I uploaded a subject.

Thanks!
Mihaela

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Mihaela

if you want to upload a representative subject we will take a look
cheers
Bruce
On Tue,
25 Nov 2014, Mihaela Stefan wrote:

> Hello Freesurfers,
> We noticed that our subcortical segmentations have a poor quality (see
> attachment). Is there a way to improve the segmentation in an automated
> fashion (avoiding long hours of manual editing)?
>
> We use FS 5.3 on Ubuntu 12.04.
>
> Thanks!
> Mihaela
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.