Hi Gabriel - If you just need volumetric labels of the Mori tracts, you can get that directly by downloading their atlas. The tracula atlas doesn't have an average volume (it doesn't represent the tracts as volumes at all) and in any case you'd still have the problem of registering your individuals to a common space (it sounds like you want to use fsaverage as your common space, which tracula is independent of). Am I misunderstanding what you're asking?
a.y
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Gabriel Gonzalez Escamilla wrote:
>Dear Anastasia Yendiki,
>
>
>My name is Gabriel, I'm a student on a Spanish university, working with MRI and FS, I’m
>looking for a new way to parcellate the WM on a group of subjects (without DTI data)
>processed with FS v5.1. I know there exist some WM fiber atlas, but I saw that you have
>develop something that could match more precisely the FS space on my subjects, and as you
>have as background the Mori atlas, that to my knowledge, is the most complete WM atlas (Mori
>et al., 1999; Wakana et al., 2007).
>
>I have found in your 2011 tracula paper, the next phrase:
>
>“We have developed TRACULA (TRActs Constrained by UnderLying Anatomy), a method for automated
>reconstruction of major white-matter pathways that is based on the global probabilistic
>approach of Jbabdi et al. (2007) and utilizes prior information on the anatomy of the
>pathways from a set of training subjects. Once the pathways have been labeled manually in the
>training set, their trajectories are combined with an automatic anatomical segmentation of
>the same subject (Dale et al., 1999; Fischl et al., 1999a,b, 2002, 2004a,b; Fischl and Dale,
>2000) to derive a description of the pathways in terms of the structures that they intersect
>and neighbour. The knowledge on path anatomy that is extracted from the training set is then
>used to initialize a global probabilistic tractography algorithm and also to constrain its
>search space by penalizing connections that do not match our prior anatomical knowledge. This
>allows the algorithm to reconstruct the pathways reliably in a novel subject with no manual
>intervention, facilitating the analysis of large data sets.”
>
>I’m wondering if the manually labeled pathways (trajectories) combined in an anatomical
>segmentation of the same subject are available? or if this subject is distributed somehow
>with FS v5.1?
>
>Or if can you give me an advice of how to proceed to make my own from a stardard atlas (i.e.
>JHU_atlas in MNI space).
>
>
>Many thanks in advanced,
>
>Gabriel.
>
>
>
>
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.