Thanks for your email. I gave your suggestion a try - reduced the dPSD to 0.5 (as well as adjusted the PSDMAX, and no. of volumes to reflect the new TR - see full command line below). Unfortunately the efficiency is way down (0.03) and the VRF you previously suggested should be between 20-40 is 4.5! I now wonder if Optseq is trying to tell me this is now a bad design!!
optseq2 --ntp 240 --tr 2.5 --psdwin 0 20 0.5 --ev hf 3 50 --ev lf 3 50 --ev nf 3 50 --nkeep 3 --o test14 --nsearch 10000 --focb 100
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:33:07 -0400
From: greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] dPSD and ev duration
Hi Ella, it has an internal clock that events have to be
syncrhonized to. Try setting the dPSD to 0.5
doug
On 7/28/13 4:05 PM, Ella Hinton wrote:
Hi
Quick question - why must the duration of the EVs be an
integer multiple of the dPSD, which is also tied to the TR? I
have event duration of 3 seconds, but would like to reduce my
TR from 3 down to 2.5, but I can't seem to input the correct
numbers for optseq to help me.
thanks in advance
Ella
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.