Thanks.
I'll try without expert opts.
But i'm not sure if i can get better results.
Before I found out these expert opts, I ran some images recon2 without expert opts. And they got poor segmentation.
Actually, some images showed improvement with those options.
I'm curious why these options work for some images and don't for others.
And, 3D SPGR sequences were used. (TR=22, TE=4, thickness=1.4, FOV=240*240, FA=40)


2012/11/12 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Can you try it without the expert opts? And what sequence is the data?



On Nov 12, 2012, at 3:35 AM, youngmin huh <ymin1123@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
> I'm working with some images, and freesurfer didn't properly detect some of their white matter boundaries.
> I attached some examples.
> I ran recon2 with expert options(-b 20 -n 5).
> As you can see, they have inaccurate white matter boundaries in curved area.
> I think it's not that highly curved, though.
> Any comment will be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Youngmin Huh
>
> <image.jpeg><image.jpeg>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.