External Email - Use Caution        

Hi Bruce,

Thanks for the response. For all the files to be the same size it would also mean that the precision of the numbers would have to be specific, which I suppose is the case.

Best,
Steven

On Feb 6, 2023, at 15:52, Fischl, Bruce R.,PHD <BFISCHL@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

Hi Steven
 
Why wouldn’t they be the same size? The qcache files have all been mapped to an fs average icosahedral space, so they all have the same number of vertices (and hence the same size)
 
Cheers
Bruce
 
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> On Behalf Of Steven Meisler
Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 3:32 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] qcache morphometry measures are empty
 

        External Email - Use Caution        

Hi,
 
Following up in reporting that it does appear to be an issue with Nibabel and not FreeSurfer. mri_diff between the metric files reveals that they are not empty. I have found an alternative for loading the morphological metrics in python, so consider this issue solved, though I am curious why the files are all the same sizes.
 
Best,
Steven


On Feb 6, 2023, at 14:17, Steven Meisler <smeisler@g.harvard.edu> wrote:
 
Hello FreeSurfer developers,
 
 
I am preparing a surface-based morphometry analysis. I ran recon-all v7.3.2 with qcache enabled. It completes without error and I do see the output files in fsaverage space at the various smoothing kernels, as expected. However, the fsaverage space smooth files appear to be empty, based upon trying to load their data with the Python package Nibabel. Some other notes:
 
1) When I load the QCACHE files, there are no errors in loading the file, but the data array returned is empty, so the files appear to be properly formatted morphological files.
2) When I load the native space thickness file (e.g. surf/lh.thickness), I get the expected full output with all data there, so I doubt it is a Nibabel issue.
3) This happens for all subjects, measurement types (e.g. area, volume, etc) and smoothing kernels.
4) All qcache outputs are the same file size (668.6 kb), which doesn’t seem like it should be right.
 
I am planning on running models on the data outside of Freesurfer since I have to deal with complex tasks such as site harmonization and general additive modeling, which is why I cannot proceed using the typical mris_preproc method.
 
Please let me know if I can provide any other helpful information in addressing this.
 
Best,
Steven
 
 
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline <MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.