External Email - Use Caution        

Hello,
Im wondering if there is an update regarding etiv differences between recon all and using sclimbic. I want to divide the volumes extracted from using sclimbic on t1s by etiv.  Im not sure given the discrepancy if I should use etiv extracted from recon all command or from sclimbic.  
Thanks,
Miriam

From: Miriam Taza <miriam.taza@mail.mcgill.ca>
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 6:01 PM
To: Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgreve@mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] sclimbic sometimes does not detect left basal forebrain
 
Hello,
I just wanted to follow up about etiv, if you had the chance to look into if your recon all vs sclimbic also does simithing similar on the subjs i sent?
I am also attaching another graph that depicts the difference between etivs extracted from sclimbic and from recon all. 

Thanks for all your help,
Miriam

From: Miriam Taza <miriam.taza@mail.mcgill.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 4:59 PM
To: Douglas N. Greve <dgreve@mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] sclimbic sometimes does not detect left basal forebrain
 
Hello,

Attached are a few subjects, where YA denotes younger adults and OA older adults. I also included the stats file when I run sclimbic for reference. Please let me know if this mode of transfer works. 

Thank you,
Miriam

P.S. I also sent a previous email regarding etiv values "etiv value differs if using recon all vs freesurfer dev". Are you able to also see if your sclimbic etiv values differ much from recon all? For example, sub1221084 etiv greatly differs between sclimbic, old recon all, and new recon all. 


 

From: Douglas N. Greve <dgreve@mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2022 12:29 PM
To: Miriam Taza <miriam.taza@mail.mcgill.ca>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] sclimbic sometimes does not detect left basal forebrain
 
yes, you can try sending it to me. if they are too big for email, then we have other solutions

On 7/29/2022 12:19 PM, Miriam Taza wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution        

Hello,
Thank you for your quick response! 
I can certainly share a few participants data with you but I would prefer not to share with the entire mailing list if possible. If so, should I attach it to this email? 

I could send you more than one if you prefer. 

Thank you,
Miriam 



From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Douglas N. Greve <dgreve@mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2022 12:06 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] sclimbic sometimes does not detect left basal forebrain
 
Can you send us a sample case?

On 7/28/2022 8:58 PM, Miriam Taza wrote:
Nothing strange about them. 
They’re T1w scans 1x1x1mm3

From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Douglas N. Greve <dgreve@mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 1:25 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] sclimbic sometimes does not detect left basal forebrain
 
Have you looked at the input volume to see if there is anything strange about them? What kind of scans are you passing to it? What is the resolution?

On 7/25/2022 9:03 PM, Miriam Taza wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution        

Hello,
I noticed 20 out of ~240 subjects left basal forebrain volumes were not picked up after running ScLimbic. These are healthy adults and their scans look good. Also, I noticed often when this occurs NAcc is also 0 or other regions. 
I am concerned if there is a systematic issue with left volumes ending up smaller than they should relative to right.

Thanks,
Miriam

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline .


Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.