Thanks Anastasia,
I'd looked at the Benner article which didn't give a rationale for the selection of thresholds.  I've been testing different T values and am settling on something much higher than the default (~700).  With the default value nearly all of our scans wind up with floor values (0 and 1 respectively) for the Benner score and % bad slices.
 
Ruth 


From: Anastasia Yendiki <ayendiki@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
To: Ruth Carper <rcarper_99@yahoo.com>
Cc: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] dmri_motion


Hi Ruth - These parameters are described in Benner 2011 (cited in our
paper). The -T threshold is mostly what you might need to change,
depending on your scanner. You should look at the low-b images and find a
rough lower threshold for the image intensities of brain voxels. It
doesn't have to be exact, but it shouldn't be off by an order of
magnitude, either.

Also, for the purposes of a group study, the most important thing is
differences in motion measures between groups or correlation between
motion measures and study effects, rather than the absolute values of the
motion measures themselves.

Hope this helps,
a.y

On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Ruth Carper wrote:

> Hi, 
> I've been using dmri_motion to quantify motion in our DTI data.  Can you
> give any guidance on selecting values for the -D and -T flags?  I didn't see
> anything in the wiki or in your related papers and it can have a substantial
> effect on the outputs.  
> Thanks.

>  
>
>


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.