Thanks, we'll try that instead! One GLM seemed most elegant to us, but I guess for the results it wouldn't matter. But for the within group paired analysis, should we use the longitudinal directories (gotten via the longitudinal processing stream) or the directories we got with the standard recon-all command?

2017-03-15 16:16 GMT+01:00 Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:

Why do you want to do this all with a single FSGD file? I think it is possible, but it will not be easy to set up. I would do it with 3 FSGD files. The first two would be to do the within group paired analysis. The third would be a straight forward two-group analysis (actually 4 group if you want to include gender).


On 3/15/17 5:02 AM, Maaike van der Plas wrote:
Dear Experts,

We're doing a study on a group of patients with the same disease, all of whom got the same treatment for three months. Some of them improved (thus becoming "responders"), others didn't ("non-responders"). They got MRI's at baseline (tp1: before the treatment) and again afterwards (tp2). All subjects received both MRI's and the interval between MRI's was three months for everyone.

Our goal is to see what changed in the brains of the responders and the non-responders from tp1 to tp2. Specifically, we want to compare the responders at tp2 to responders at tp1, non-responders at tp2 to non-responders at tp1 and we want to compare the change in responders to the change in non-responders. We'd like to create one GLM in which we can do all three of these analyses.

To do so, we're currently using the tutorial on Paired Analysis (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/PairedAnalysis), with two groups (non-responders and responders), and two covariates (age and gender).

My first question is about the first FSGD file, containing the matching pairs listed consecutively. Should these subject names refer to the directories we got from the longitudinal processing stream (e.g. OAS2_001_MRI.long.OAS2_001) or those we got from running the 'normal', non-longitudinal recon-all command (e.g. OAS2_001_MRI)?

My second question is about the contrast file we should use to compare the subjects from tp2 to tp1 in each group separately. In the mailing list and in the tutorials, I'm mostly seeing examples to compare two groups with each other (with contrasts like '1 -1 0 0 0 0). But am I correct in thinking that to compare responders (the second group listed in the second FSGD file) at tp2 to tp1 while adjusting for gender and age, I should use the following contrast?:

0 1 0 0 0 0


Kind regards and thank you,
M.C. van der Plas
Leiden University Medical Center


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.