Hi Bruce,

The command that we ran is  recon-all.

Below is the error msg:

mri_label2label --srcsubject fsaverage --srclabel /export/data/hippocampus/HMN/data/fsaverage/label/lh.BA2.label --trgsubject HMN122 --trglabel ./lh.BA2.label --hemi lh --regmethod surface

No such file or directory

mri_label2label: could not open label file /export/data/hippocampus/HMN/data/fsaverage/label/lh.BA2.label

srclabel = /export/data/hippocampus/HMN/data/fsaverage/label/lh.BA2.label

srcsubject = fsaverage

trgsubject = HMN122

trglabel = ./lh.BA2.label

regmethod = surface

srchemi = lh

trghemi = lh

trgsurface = white

srcsurfreg = sphere.reg

trgsurfreg = sphere.reg

usehash = 1

Use ProjAbs  = 0, 0

Use ProjFrac = 0, 0

DoPaint 0

SUBJECTS_DIR    /export/data/hippocampus/HMN/data

FREESURFER_HOME /cell_root/software/freesurfer/current/sys

Loading source label.

Invalid argument

ERROR reading /export/data/hippocampus/HMN/data/fsaverage/label/lh.BA2.label

Linux hippocampus.umd.edu 2.6.32-573.12.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Nov 23 12:55:32 EST 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

recon-all -s HMN122 exited with ERRORS at Tue Feb 23 16:40:01 EST 2016

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Fengji

you need to give us more details about the problems before we can help

you. What commands failed? What was the screen output?

Note that there is still no such thing as FS 6.0. We are hoping to have it

in the relatively near term, but it doesn't exist yet.

cheers

Bruce

On Tue, 1 Mar 2016,

Fengji Geng wrote:

> Dear fs developers,?

>

> we are attempting to use the stable version of fs 5.1 for processing while

> also using the most current version for hippocampal segmentation on the same

> set of subjects (freesurfer 6.0 dev version on 28-Jan-2016). However, when

> the develop version of fs 6 was installed, we began having an issue with the

> fsaverage folder linking to the newest version, when we need it to link to

> version 5.1 during processing. The label files that we need for processing

> in version 5.1 are not accessible in the new version?s fsaverage

> folder.?However, before we updated to fs 6.0 dev version on 28-Jan-2016, we

> never had this issue. So, we are wondering if the newest develop version of

> fs 6.0 does not allow?two versions of fs to be used in the same data.?

>

> Looking forward to hearing from you and thanks in advance.

>

> Best,

>

> ----- Fengji

---

Fengji