I am interested in the S_intraparietal-and_Parietal_transverse label from
the Desitreux atlas using aparc.a2005s.annot.
 
If I load this into fsaverage, it has three regions to it (see dark purple
label in the attached screenshot): two big ones, very close to each other,
connected by two narrow bridges, and another much smaller region more
dorsally.
 
Does this look fine to you?!
 
Secondly, assuming this is ok, I created labels for each subject using
mri_annotation2label and turned those labels into ROIs in standard space
using
 
mri_label2vol --label
xx/label/lh.S_intraparietal-and_Parietal_transverse.label --temp
xx/reg_standard/example_func.nii.gz --reg
xx/reg/freesurfer/anat2std.register.dat --o
xx/reg_standard/stats/lh.S_intraparietal-and_Parietal_transverse.nii.gz
 
However, when I load this volume with:
 
tksurfer fsaverage lh inflated -overlay
lh.S_intraparietal-and_Parietal_transverse.nii.gz -mni152reg -fthresh 0.1
-fmax 1
 
it looks a bit off (see yellow label and red ROI in second screenshot).
 
Would you think that's still ok taking into account the individual anatomy
or did something go wrong somewhere?
 
Thanks for your help,
 
Esther