
Tue Nov  9 17:26:56 EST 2021
cd /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07
setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/bin/recon-all -i /home/basuia/Desktop/46462693/46462693_fMRI_20210623094933_2.nii -subjid UC07 -all -parallel

subjid UC07
setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects
FREESURFER_HOME /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer
Actual FREESURFER_HOME /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer
build-stamp.txt: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185
Linux Ishita-Ubuntu 5.4.0-89-generic #100~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 29 10:59:42 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
cputime      unlimited
filesize     unlimited
datasize     unlimited
stacksize    8192 kbytes
coredumpsize 0 kbytes
memoryuse    unlimited
vmemoryuse   unlimited
descriptors  1024 
memorylocked 65536 kbytes
maxproc      127257 
maxlocks     unlimited
maxsignal    127257 
maxmessage   819200 
maxnice      0 
maxrtprio    0 
maxrttime    unlimited

              total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
Mem:            31G        1.5G         28G        357M        1.3G         28G
Swap:           29G          0B         29G

########################################
program versions used
dev (freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185)
dev

ProgramName: lta_convert  ProgramArguments: lta_convert -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_and  ProgramArguments: mri_and -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_annotation2label  ProgramArguments: mri_annotation2label -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_aparc2aseg  ProgramArguments: mri_aparc2aseg -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_surf2volseg  ProgramArguments: mri_surf2volseg -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_binarize  ProgramArguments: mri_binarize -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_ca_label  ProgramArguments: mri_ca_label -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_ca_normalize  ProgramArguments: mri_ca_normalize -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_ca_register  ProgramArguments: mri_ca_register -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_cc  ProgramArguments: mri_cc -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_compute_overlap  ProgramArguments: mri_compute_overlap -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_compute_seg_overlap  ProgramArguments: mri_compute_seg_overlap -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_concat  ProgramArguments: mri_concat -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_concatenate_lta  ProgramArguments: mri_concatenate_lta -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
mri_convert -all-info 
ProgramName: mri_convert  ProgramArguments: mri_convert -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_diff  ProgramArguments: mri_diff -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_edit_wm_with_aseg  ProgramArguments: mri_edit_wm_with_aseg -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_em_register  ProgramArguments: mri_em_register -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_fill  ProgramArguments: mri_fill -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_fuse_segmentations  ProgramArguments: mri_fuse_segmentations -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_fwhm  ProgramArguments: mri_fwhm -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_gcut  ProgramArguments: mri_gcut -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_info  ProgramArguments: mri_info -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_label2label  ProgramArguments: mri_label2label -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:56-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_label2vol  ProgramArguments: mri_label2vol -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_log_likelihood  ProgramArguments: mri_log_likelihood -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_mask  ProgramArguments: mri_mask -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_matrix_multiply  ProgramArguments: mri_matrix_multiply -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_normalize  ProgramArguments: mri_normalize -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_normalize_tp2  ProgramArguments: mri_normalize_tp2 -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_or  ProgramArguments: mri_or -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_relabel_hypointensities  ProgramArguments: mri_relabel_hypointensities -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_relabel_nonwm_hypos  ProgramArguments: mri_relabel_nonwm_hypos -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_remove_neck  ProgramArguments: mri_remove_neck -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
dev

ProgramName: mri_robust_register  ProgramArguments: mri_robust_register -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
dev

ProgramName: mri_robust_template  ProgramArguments: mri_robust_template -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_anatomical_stats  ProgramArguments: mris_anatomical_stats -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_ca_label  ProgramArguments: mris_ca_label -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_calc  ProgramArguments: mris_calc -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_convert  ProgramArguments: mris_convert -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_curvature  ProgramArguments: mris_curvature -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_curvature_stats  ProgramArguments: mris_curvature_stats -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_diff  ProgramArguments: mris_diff -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_divide_parcellation  ProgramArguments: mris_divide_parcellation -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_segment  ProgramArguments: mri_segment -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_segstats  ProgramArguments: mri_segstats -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_euler_number  ProgramArguments: mris_euler_number -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_fix_topology  ProgramArguments: mris_fix_topology -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_topo_fixer  ProgramArguments: mris_topo_fixer -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_jacobian  ProgramArguments: mris_jacobian -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_label2annot  ProgramArguments: mris_label2annot -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_left_right_register  ProgramArguments: mris_left_right_register -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_place_surface  ProgramArguments: mris_place_surface -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mrisp_paint  ProgramArguments: mrisp_paint -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_register  ProgramArguments: mris_register -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_smooth  ProgramArguments: mris_smooth -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_sphere  ProgramArguments: mris_sphere -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_surface_stats  ProgramArguments: mris_surface_stats -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_stats2seg  ProgramArguments: mri_stats2seg -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_thickness  ProgramArguments: mris_thickness -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_thickness_diff  ProgramArguments: mris_thickness_diff -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_topo_fixer  ProgramArguments: mris_topo_fixer -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_surf2surf  ProgramArguments: mri_surf2surf -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_surf2vol  ProgramArguments: mri_surf2vol -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_surfcluster  ProgramArguments: mri_surfcluster -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mris_volmask  ProgramArguments: mris_volmask -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_tessellate  ProgramArguments: mri_tessellate -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_vol2surf  ProgramArguments: mri_vol2surf -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_vol2vol  ProgramArguments: mri_vol2vol -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_voldiff  ProgramArguments: mri_voldiff -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: mri_watershed  ProgramArguments: mri_watershed -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
ProgramName: tkregister2  ProgramArguments: tkregister2_cmdl -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
mri_motion_correct.fsl dev
mri_convert -all-info 
ProgramName: mri_convert  ProgramArguments: mri_convert -all-info  ProgramVersion: dev  TimeStamp: 2021/11/09-22:26:57-GMT  BuildTime: Aug 24 2021 08:56:39  BuildStamp: freesurfer-linux-ubuntu18_x86_64-dev-20210824-e101185  User: basuia  Machine: Ishita-Ubuntu  Platform: Linux  PlatformVersion: 5.4.0-89-generic  CompilerName: GCC  CompilerVersion: 4.8.5
Program nu_correct, built from:
Package MNI N3, version 1.12.0, compiled by nicks@terrier (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) on 2015-06-19 at 01:25:34
#######################################
GCADIR /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average
GCA RB_all_2020-01-02.gca
GCASkull RB_all_withskull_2020_01_02.gca
AvgCurvTif folding.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.tif
GCSDIR /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average
GCS DKaparc.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.gcs
#######################################
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07

 mri_convert /home/basuia/Desktop/46462693/46462693_fMRI_20210623094933_2.nii /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/orig/001.mgz 

mri_convert /home/basuia/Desktop/46462693/46462693_fMRI_20210623094933_2.nii /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/orig/001.mgz 
reading from /home/basuia/Desktop/46462693/46462693_fMRI_20210623094933_2.nii...
TR=7.33, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00
i_ras = (1, 0, 0)
j_ras = (0, 1, 0)
k_ras = (0, 0, 1)
writing to /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/orig/001.mgz...
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:17:26:57 mri_convert N 2 e 1.29 S 0.00 U 1.61 P 125% M 32612 F 3 R 6822 W 0 c 8 w 7 I 728 O 24112 L 0.13 0.22 0.25
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:17:26:58 mri_convert N 2 0.13 0.22 0.25
#--------------------------------------------
#@# MotionCor Tue Nov  9 17:26:59 EST 2021
Found 1 runs
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/orig/001.mgz
Checking for (invalid) multi-frame inputs...
Only one run found so motion
correction will not be performed. I'll
copy the run to rawavg and continue.

 cp /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/orig/001.mgz /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/rawavg.mgz 

/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07

 mri_convert /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/rawavg.mgz /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/orig.mgz --conform 

mri_convert /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/rawavg.mgz /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/orig.mgz --conform 
reading from /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/rawavg.mgz...
TR=7.33, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00
i_ras = (1, 0, 0)
j_ras = (0, 1, 0)
k_ras = (0, 0, 1)
changing data type from short to uchar (noscale = 0)...
MRIchangeType: Building histogram 0 26768 1000, flo=0, fhi=0.999, dest_type=0
Reslicing using trilinear interpolation 
writing to /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/orig.mgz...
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:17:27:02 mri_convert N 3 e 3.97 S 0.04 U 4.25 P 108% M 45464 F 0 R 18280 W 0 c 13 w 4 I 0 O 10872 L 0.13 0.22 0.25
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:17:27:06 mri_convert N 3 0.20 0.23 0.25

 mri_add_xform_to_header -c /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/transforms/talairach.xfm /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/orig.mgz /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/orig.mgz 

INFO: extension is mgz
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:17:27:06 mri_add_xform_to_header N 4 e 0.55 S 0.01 U 0.86 P 158% M 23316 F 14 R 4584 W 0 c 3 w 21 I 3112 O 10872 L 0.20 0.23 0.25
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:17:27:06 mri_add_xform_to_header N 4 0.20 0.23 0.25
#--------------------------------------------
#@# Talairach Tue Nov  9 17:27:06 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri

 mri_nu_correct.mni --no-rescale --i orig.mgz --o orig_nu.mgz --ants-n4 --n 1 --proto-iters 1000 --distance 50 

/usr/bin/bc
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/bin/mri_nu_correct.mni
--no-rescale --i orig.mgz --o orig_nu.mgz --ants-n4 --n 1 --proto-iters 1000 --distance 50
nIters 1
mri_nu_correct.mni dev
Linux Ishita-Ubuntu 5.4.0-89-generic #100~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 29 10:59:42 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Tue Nov  9 17:27:06 EST 2021
tmpdir is ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.4169
cd /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri
AntsN4BiasFieldCorrectionFs -i orig.mgz -o ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.4169/nu0.mgz --dtype uchar
AntsN4BiasFieldCorrectionFs done
mri_convert ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.4169/nu0.mgz orig_nu.mgz --like orig.mgz --conform
mri_convert ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.4169/nu0.mgz orig_nu.mgz --like orig.mgz --conform 
reading from ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.4169/nu0.mgz...
TR=7.33, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00
i_ras = (-1, 0, 0)
j_ras = (0, 0, -1)
k_ras = (0, 1, 0)
INFO: transform src into the like-volume: orig.mgz
writing to orig_nu.mgz...
 
 
Tue Nov  9 17:30:08 EST 2021
mri_nu_correct.mni done
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:17:27:06 mri_nu_correct.mni N 12 e 181.66 S 0.15 U 181.78 P 100% M 507296 F 19 R 149299 W 0 c 963 w 119 I 4352 O 20776 L 0.20 0.23 0.25
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:17:30:08 mri_nu_correct.mni N 12 0.97 0.59 0.39

 talairach_avi --i orig_nu.mgz --xfm transforms/talairach.auto.xfm 

talairach_avi log file is transforms/talairach_avi.log...
mv -f /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/talsrcimg_to_711-2C_as_mni_average_305_t4_vox2vox.txt /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/transforms/talsrcimg_to_711-2C_as_mni_average_305_t4_vox2vox.txt
Started at Tue Nov 9 17:30:08 EST 2021
Ended   at Tue Nov  9 17:30:30 EST 2021
talairach_avi done
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:17:30:08 talairach_avi N 4 e 22.42 S 0.76 U 15.92 P 74% M 255520 F 12 R 397299 W 0 c 94 w 378 I 271984 O 295272 L 0.97 0.59 0.39
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:17:30:30 talairach_avi N 4 0.91 0.60 0.40

 cp transforms/talairach.auto.xfm transforms/talairach.xfm 

lta_convert --src orig.mgz --trg /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/mni305.cor.mgz --inxfm transforms/talairach.xfm --outlta transforms/talairach.xfm.lta --subject fsaverage --ltavox2vox
dev

--src: orig.mgz src image (geometry).
--trg: /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/mni305.cor.mgz trg image (geometry).
--inmni: transforms/talairach.xfm input MNI/XFM transform.
--outlta: transforms/talairach.xfm.lta output LTA.
--s: fsaverage subject name
--ltavox2vox: output LTA as VOX_TO_VOX transform.
 LTA read, type : 1
 1.07298   0.00560   0.01733  -2.13547;
-0.03695   0.98118   0.11303  -51.19102;
-0.03346  -0.07825   1.03831   13.24757;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
setting subject to fsaverage
Writing  LTA to file transforms/talairach.xfm.lta...
lta_convert successful.
#--------------------------------------------
#@# Talairach Failure Detection Tue Nov  9 17:30:33 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri

 talairach_afd -T 0.005 -xfm transforms/talairach.xfm 

talairach_afd: Talairach Transform: transforms/talairach.xfm OK (p=0.6995, pval=0.4932 >= threshold=0.0050)
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:17:30:33 talairach_afd N 4 e 0.00 S 0.00 U 0.00 P 40% M 5608 F 10 R 199 W 0 c 0 w 17 I 2512 O 0 L 0.84 0.59 0.40
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:17:30:33 talairach_afd N 4 0.84 0.59 0.40

 awk -f /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/bin/extract_talairach_avi_QA.awk /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/transforms/talairach_avi.log 


 tal_QC_AZS /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/transforms/talairach_avi.log 

TalAviQA: 0.97606
z-score: 0
#--------------------------------------------
#@# Nu Intensity Correction Tue Nov  9 17:30:33 EST 2021

 mri_nu_correct.mni --i orig.mgz --o nu.mgz --uchar transforms/talairach.xfm --n 2 --ants-n4 

/usr/bin/bc
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/bin/mri_nu_correct.mni
--i orig.mgz --o nu.mgz --uchar transforms/talairach.xfm --n 2 --ants-n4
nIters 2
mri_nu_correct.mni dev
Linux Ishita-Ubuntu 5.4.0-89-generic #100~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 29 10:59:42 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Tue Nov  9 17:30:33 EST 2021
tmpdir is ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046
cd /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri
AntsN4BiasFieldCorrectionFs -i orig.mgz -o ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/nu0.mgz --dtype uchar
AntsN4BiasFieldCorrectionFs done
mri_binarize --i ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/nu0.mgz --min -1 --o ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/ones.mgz

dev
cwd /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri
cmdline mri_binarize --i ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/nu0.mgz --min -1 --o ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/ones.mgz 
sysname  Linux
hostname Ishita-Ubuntu
machine  x86_64
user     basuia

input      ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/nu0.mgz
frame      0
nErode3d   0
nErode2d   0
output     ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/ones.mgz
Binarizing based on threshold
min        -1
max        +infinity
binval        1
binvalnot     0
fstart = 0, fend = 0, nframes = 1
Starting parallel 1
Found 16777216 values in range
Counting number of voxels in first frame
Found 16777215 voxels in final mask
Writing output to ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/ones.mgz
Count: 16777215 16777215.000000 16777216 99.999994
mri_binarize done
mri_segstats --id 1 --seg ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/ones.mgz --i orig.mgz --sum ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/sum.junk --avgwf ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/input.mean.dat

dev
cwd 
cmdline mri_segstats --id 1 --seg ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/ones.mgz --i orig.mgz --sum ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/sum.junk --avgwf ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/input.mean.dat 
sysname  Linux
hostname Ishita-Ubuntu
machine  x86_64
user     basuia
whitesurfname  white
UseRobust  0
Loading ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/ones.mgz
Loading orig.mgz
Voxel Volume is 1 mm^3
Generating list of segmentation ids
Found   1 segmentations
Computing statistics for each segmentation

Reporting on   1 segmentations
Using PrintSegStat
Computing spatial average of each frame
  0
Writing to ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/input.mean.dat
mri_segstats done
mri_segstats --id 1 --seg ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/ones.mgz --i ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/nu0.mgz --sum ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/sum.junk --avgwf ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/output.mean.dat

dev
cwd 
cmdline mri_segstats --id 1 --seg ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/ones.mgz --i ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/nu0.mgz --sum ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/sum.junk --avgwf ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/output.mean.dat 
sysname  Linux
hostname Ishita-Ubuntu
machine  x86_64
user     basuia
whitesurfname  white
UseRobust  0
Loading ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/ones.mgz
Loading ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/nu0.mgz
Voxel Volume is 1 mm^3
Generating list of segmentation ids
Found   1 segmentations
Computing statistics for each segmentation

Reporting on   1 segmentations
Using PrintSegStat
Computing spatial average of each frame
  0
Writing to ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/output.mean.dat
mri_segstats done
mris_calc -o ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/nu0.mgz ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/nu0.mgz mul 1.17497432619357002137
Saving result to './tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/nu0.mgz' (type = MGH )                       [ ok ]
mri_convert ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/nu0.mgz nu.mgz --like orig.mgz
mri_convert ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/nu0.mgz nu.mgz --like orig.mgz 
reading from ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.5046/nu0.mgz...
TR=7.33, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00
i_ras = (-1, 0, 0)
j_ras = (0, 0, -1)
k_ras = (0, 1, 0)
INFO: transform src into the like-volume: orig.mgz
writing to nu.mgz...
mri_make_uchar nu.mgz transforms/talairach.xfm nu.mgz
type change took 0 minutes and 5 seconds.
mapping ( 8, 98) to ( 3, 110)
 
 
Tue Nov  9 17:33:53 EST 2021
mri_nu_correct.mni done
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:17:30:33 mri_nu_correct.mni N 9 e 199.88 S 0.57 U 203.54 P 102% M 614296 F 27 R 560027 W 0 c 601 w 238 I 7304 O 51464 L 0.84 0.59 0.40
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:17:33:53 mri_nu_correct.mni N 9 1.00 0.80 0.53

 mri_add_xform_to_header -c /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/transforms/talairach.xfm nu.mgz nu.mgz 

INFO: extension is mgz
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:17:33:53 mri_add_xform_to_header N 4 e 0.41 S 0.00 U 0.72 P 173% M 23480 F 1 R 4595 W 0 c 4 w 5 I 512 O 8304 L 1.00 0.80 0.53
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:17:33:53 mri_add_xform_to_header N 4 1.00 0.80 0.53
#--------------------------------------------
#@# Intensity Normalization Tue Nov  9 17:33:53 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri

 mri_normalize -g 1 -seed 1234 -mprage nu.mgz T1.mgz 

using max gradient = 1.000
setting seed for random number genererator to 1234
assuming input volume is MGH (Van der Kouwe) MP-RAGE
reading mri_src from nu.mgz...
normalizing image...
NOT doing gentle normalization with control points/label
talairach transform
 1.07298   0.00560   0.01733  -2.13547;
-0.03695   0.98118   0.11303  -51.19102;
-0.03346  -0.07825   1.03831   13.24757;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
processing without aseg, no1d=0
MRInormInit(): 
INFO: Modifying talairach volume c_(r,a,s) based on average_305
MRInormalize(): 
MRIsplineNormalize(): npeaks = 16
Starting OpenSpline(): npoints = 16
building Voronoi diagram...
performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 8...

Iterating 2 times
---------------------------------
3d normalization pass 1 of 2
white matter peak found at 110
white matter peak found at 101
gm peak at 76 (76), valley at 57 (57)
csf peak at 38, setting threshold to 63
building Voronoi diagram...
performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 8...
---------------------------------
3d normalization pass 2 of 2
white matter peak found at 110
white matter peak found at 97
gm peak at 73 (73), valley at 53 (53)
csf peak at 37, setting threshold to 61
building Voronoi diagram...
performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 8...
Done iterating ---------------------------------
writing output to T1.mgz
3D bias adjustment took 1 minutes and 13 seconds.
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:17:33:53 mri_normalize N 7 e 73.89 S 0.23 U 84.09 P 114% M 568384 F 5 R 263609 W 0 c 237 w 18 I 1480 O 8592 L 1.00 0.80 0.53
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:17:35:07 mri_normalize N 7 1.18 0.92 0.59
#--------------------------------------------
#@# Skull Stripping Tue Nov  9 17:35:07 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri

 mri_em_register -skull nu.mgz /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/RB_all_withskull_2020_01_02.gca transforms/talairach_with_skull.lta 

aligning to atlas containing skull, setting unknown_nbr_spacing = 5

== Number of threads available to mri_em_register for OpenMP = 4 == 
reading 1 input volumes...
logging results to talairach_with_skull.log
reading '/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/RB_all_withskull_2020_01_02.gca'...
GCAread took 0 minutes and 1 seconds.
average std = 23.0   using min determinant for regularization = 52.8
0 singular and 9205 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized
reading 'nu.mgz'...
freeing gibbs priors...done.
accounting for voxel sizes in initial transform
bounding unknown intensity as < 8.9 or > 556.0 
total sample mean = 77.3 (1403 zeros)
************************************************
spacing=8, using 3292 sample points, tol=1.00e-05...
************************************************
register_mri: find_optimal_transform
find_optimal_transform: nsamples 3292, passno 0, spacing 8
resetting wm mean[0]: 100 --> 108
resetting gm mean[0]: 61 --> 61
input volume #1 is the most T1-like
using real data threshold=7.0
skull bounding box = (47, 47, 9) --> (216, 229, 226)
finding center of left hemi white matter
using (103, 108, 118) as brain centroid of Right_Cerebral_White_Matter...
MRImask(): AllowDiffGeom = 1
mean wm in atlas = 108, using box (82,86,91) --> (123, 130,144) to find MRI wm
before smoothing, mri peak at 101
robust fit to distribution - 103 +- 8.5
after smoothing, mri peak at 104, scaling input intensities by 1.038
scaling channel 0 by 1.03846
initial log_p = -4.645
************************************************
First Search limited to translation only.
************************************************
max log p =    -4.571695 @ (-10.526, -10.526, -10.526)
max log p =    -4.550993 @ (5.263, 5.263, 5.263)
max log p =    -4.540653 @ (2.632, -7.895, -2.632)
max log p =    -4.496879 @ (-1.316, 1.316, -1.316)
max log p =    -4.496065 @ (-1.974, -0.658, 0.658)
max log p =    -4.483046 @ (0.987, 0.329, 1.645)
max log p =    -4.483046 @ (0.000, 0.000, 0.000)
max log p =    -4.483046 @ (0.000, 0.000, 0.000)
Found translation: (-4.9, -12.2, -6.9): log p = -4.483
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 0 nscales = 0 ...
****************************************
Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-4.444, old_max_log_p =-4.483 (thresh=-4.5)
 1.07500   0.00000   0.00000  -14.68697;
 0.00000   1.06580   0.14032  -31.39108;
 0.00000  -0.13053   0.99144   14.23999;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
iteration took 0 minutes and 26 seconds.
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 1 nscales = 0 ...
****************************************
Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-4.414, old_max_log_p =-4.444 (thresh=-4.4)
 1.07500   0.00000   0.00000  -14.68697;
 0.00000   1.14574   0.15084  -44.40368;
 0.00000  -0.13053   0.99144   14.23999;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
iteration took 0 minutes and 26 seconds.
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 2 nscales = 0 ...
****************************************
Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-4.414, old_max_log_p =-4.414 (thresh=-4.4)
 1.07500   0.00000   0.00000  -14.68697;
 0.00000   1.14574   0.15084  -44.40368;
 0.00000  -0.13053   0.99144   14.23999;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
reducing scale to 0.2500
iteration took 0 minutes and 25 seconds.
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 3 nscales = 1 ...
****************************************
Result so far: scale 0.250: max_log_p=-4.388, old_max_log_p =-4.414 (thresh=-4.4)
 1.05141   0.07615  -0.02017  -22.48556;
-0.06543   1.09554   0.17794  -31.78747;
 0.03445  -0.16459   0.96628   15.78659;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
iteration took 0 minutes and 23 seconds.
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 4 nscales = 1 ...
****************************************
Result so far: scale 0.250: max_log_p=-4.379, old_max_log_p =-4.388 (thresh=-4.4)
 1.07121   0.04369  -0.05800  -15.81273;
-0.03394   1.12197   0.14828  -36.30516;
 0.06785  -0.12709   0.98882   5.04714;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
iteration took 0 minutes and 23 seconds.
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 5 nscales = 1 ...
****************************************
Result so far: scale 0.250: max_log_p=-4.375, old_max_log_p =-4.379 (thresh=-4.4)
 1.05108   0.07476  -0.02036  -22.15591;
-0.07032   1.14108   0.15183  -34.74282;
 0.03215  -0.12604   0.97163   11.61683;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
reducing scale to 0.0625
iteration took 0 minutes and 23 seconds.
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 6 nscales = 2 ...
****************************************
Result so far: scale 0.062: max_log_p=-4.356, old_max_log_p =-4.375 (thresh=-4.4)
 1.05288   0.07700  -0.03634  -19.91115;
-0.07032   1.14108   0.15183  -34.74282;
 0.04917  -0.12437   0.96775   9.57888;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
iteration took 0 minutes and 21 seconds.
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 7 nscales = 2 ...
****************************************
Result so far: scale 0.062: max_log_p=-4.353, old_max_log_p =-4.356 (thresh=-4.4)
 1.05658   0.07727  -0.03647  -20.42136;
-0.07032   1.14108   0.15183  -34.74282;
 0.04905  -0.12407   0.96548   9.81698;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
min search scale 0.025000 reached
***********************************************
Computing MAP estimate using 3292 samples...
***********************************************
dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-05
l_intensity = 1.0000
Aligning input volume to GCA...
Transform matrix
 1.05658   0.07727  -0.03647  -20.42136;
-0.07032   1.14108   0.15183  -34.74282;
 0.04905  -0.12407   0.96548   9.81698;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
nsamples 3292
Quasinewton: input matrix
 1.05658   0.07727  -0.03647  -20.42136;
-0.07032   1.14108   0.15183  -34.74282;
 0.04905  -0.12407   0.96548   9.81698;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
 IFLAG= -1  LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 4 POSSIBLE CAUSES: FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESoutof QuasiNewtonEMA: 010: -log(p) =   -0.0  tol 0.000010
Resulting transform:
 1.05658   0.07727  -0.03647  -20.42136;
-0.07032   1.14108   0.15183  -34.74282;
 0.04905  -0.12407   0.96548   9.81698;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;

pass 1, spacing 8: log(p) = -4.353 (old=-4.645)
transform before final EM align:
 1.05658   0.07727  -0.03647  -20.42136;
-0.07032   1.14108   0.15183  -34.74282;
 0.04905  -0.12407   0.96548   9.81698;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;

**************************************************
 EM alignment process ...
 Computing final MAP estimate using 364986 samples. 
**************************************************
dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-07
l_intensity = 1.0000
Aligning input volume to GCA...
Transform matrix
 1.05658   0.07727  -0.03647  -20.42136;
-0.07032   1.14108   0.15183  -34.74282;
 0.04905  -0.12407   0.96548   9.81698;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
nsamples 364986
Quasinewton: input matrix
 1.05658   0.07727  -0.03647  -20.42136;
-0.07032   1.14108   0.15183  -34.74282;
 0.04905  -0.12407   0.96548   9.81698;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
 IFLAG= -1  LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 6 POSSIBLE CAUSES: FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESoutof QuasiNewtonEMA: 012: -log(p) =    4.7  tol 0.000000
final transform:
 1.05658   0.07727  -0.03647  -20.42136;
-0.07032   1.14108   0.15183  -34.74282;
 0.04905  -0.12407   0.96548   9.81698;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;

writing output transformation to transforms/talairach_with_skull.lta...
#VMPC# mri_em_register VmPeak  827740
FSRUNTIME@ mri_em_register  0.0648 hours 4 threads
registration took 3 minutes and 53 seconds.
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:17:35:07 mri_em_register N 4 e 233.44 S 0.47 U 815.40 P 349% M 629208 F 5 R 166680 W 0 c 1664 w 156 I 151112 O 32 L 1.18 0.92 0.59
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:17:39:00 mri_em_register N 4 2.92 2.32 1.25

 mri_watershed -T1 -brain_atlas /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/RB_all_withskull_2020_01_02.gca transforms/talairach_with_skull.lta T1.mgz brainmask.auto.mgz 


Mode:          T1 normalized volume
Mode:          Use the information of atlas (default parms, --help for details)

*********************************************************
The input file is T1.mgz
The output file is brainmask.auto.mgz
Weighting the input with atlas information before watershed

*************************WATERSHED**************************
Sorting...
      first estimation of the COG coord: x=137 y=123 z=113 r=84
      first estimation of the main basin volume: 2518477 voxels
      Looking for seedpoints 
        2 found in the cerebellum 
        18 found in the rest of the brain 
      global maximum in x=160, y=117, z=78, Imax=255
      CSF=20, WM_intensity=110, WM_VARIANCE=5
      WM_MIN=110, WM_HALF_MIN=110, WM_HALF_MAX=110, WM_MAX=110 
      preflooding height equal to 10 percent
done.
Analyze...

      main basin size=9417337029 voxels, voxel volume =1.000 
                     = 9417337029 mmm3 = 9417336.832 cm3
done.
PostAnalyze...Basin Prior
 167 basins merged thanks to atlas 
      ***** 0 basin(s) merged in 1 iteration(s)
      ***** 0 voxel(s) added to the main basin
done.
Weighting the input with prior template 

****************TEMPLATE DEFORMATION****************

      second estimation of the COG coord: x=131,y=128, z=110, r=10166 iterations
^^^^^^^^ couldn't find WM with original limits - expanding ^^^^^^

   GLOBAL      CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=17 , nb = 45612
  RIGHT_CER    CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=5 , nb = 2934
  LEFT_CER     CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=21 , nb = 2610
 RIGHT_BRAIN   CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=16 , nb = 20052
 LEFT_BRAIN    CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=15 , nb = 19260
    OTHER      CSF_MIN=0, CSF_intensity=13, CSF_MAX=63 , nb = 756
   
                     CSF_MAX  TRANSITION  GM_MIN  GM
    GLOBAL     
  before analyzing :    17,      32,        56,   80
  after  analyzing :    17,      48,        56,   56
   RIGHT_CER   
  before analyzing :    5,      11,        69,   95
  after  analyzing :    5,      49,        69,   60
   LEFT_CER    
  before analyzing :    21,      49,        68,   80
  after  analyzing :    21,      61,        68,   65
  RIGHT_BRAIN  
  before analyzing :    16,      29,        54,   80
  after  analyzing :    16,      45,        54,   53
  LEFT_BRAIN   
  before analyzing :    15,      28,        56,   84
  after  analyzing :    15,      46,        56,   55
     OTHER     
  before analyzing :    63,      58,        56,   80
  after  analyzing :    46,      58,        58,   63
      mri_strip_skull: done peeling brain
      highly tesselated surface with 10242 vertices
      matching...61 iterations

*********************VALIDATION*********************
curvature mean = -0.013, std = 0.010
curvature mean = 73.035, std = 8.377

No Rigid alignment: -atlas Mode Off (basic atlas / no registration)
      before rotation: sse = 2.20, sigma = 3.33
      after  rotation: sse = 2.20, sigma = 3.33
Localization of inacurate regions: Erosion-Dilation steps
      the sse mean is  2.22, its var is  2.73   
      before Erosion-Dilatation  0.04% of inacurate vertices
      after  Erosion-Dilatation  0.00% of inacurate vertices
      Validation of the shape of the surface done.
Scaling of atlas fields onto current surface fields

********FINAL ITERATIVE TEMPLATE DEFORMATION********
Compute Local values csf/gray
Fine Segmentation...41 iterations

      mri_strip_skull: done peeling brain

Brain Size = 1865355 voxels, voxel volume = 1.000 mm3
           = 1865355 mmm3 = 1865.355 cm3


******************************
Saving brainmask.auto.mgz
done
mri_watershed utimesec    20.235185
mri_watershed stimesec    0.176481
mri_watershed ru_maxrss   814816
mri_watershed ru_ixrss    0
mri_watershed ru_idrss    0
mri_watershed ru_isrss    0
mri_watershed ru_minflt   206552
mri_watershed ru_majflt   7
mri_watershed ru_nswap    0
mri_watershed ru_inblock  9816
mri_watershed ru_oublock  3168
mri_watershed ru_msgsnd   0
mri_watershed ru_msgrcv   0
mri_watershed ru_nsignals 0
mri_watershed ru_nvcsw    389
mri_watershed ru_nivcsw   59
mri_watershed done
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:17:39:00 mri_watershed N 6 e 13.22 S 0.19 U 20.23 P 154% M 814816 F 7 R 206554 W 0 c 59 w 390 I 9816 O 3168 L 2.92 2.32 1.25
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:17:39:14 mri_watershed N 6 2.71 2.30 1.27

 cp brainmask.auto.mgz brainmask.mgz 

#-------------------------------------
#@# EM Registration Tue Nov  9 17:39:15 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri

 mri_em_register -uns 3 -mask brainmask.mgz nu.mgz /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2020-01-02.gca transforms/talairach.lta 

setting unknown_nbr_spacing = 3
using MR volume brainmask.mgz to mask input volume...

== Number of threads available to mri_em_register for OpenMP = 4 == 
reading 1 input volumes...
logging results to talairach.log
reading '/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2020-01-02.gca'...
GCAread took 0 minutes and 1 seconds.
average std = 7.2   using min determinant for regularization = 5.2
0 singular and 884 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized
reading 'nu.mgz'...
MRImask(): AllowDiffGeom = 1
MRImask(): AllowDiffGeom = 1
MRImask(): AllowDiffGeom = 1
MRImask(): AllowDiffGeom = 1
MRImask(): AllowDiffGeom = 1
freeing gibbs priors...done.
accounting for voxel sizes in initial transform
bounding unknown intensity as < 5.9 or > 519.0 
total sample mean = 79.1 (1017 zeros)
************************************************
spacing=8, using 2841 sample points, tol=1.00e-05...
************************************************
register_mri: find_optimal_transform
find_optimal_transform: nsamples 2841, passno 0, spacing 8
resetting wm mean[0]: 98 --> 107
resetting gm mean[0]: 61 --> 61
input volume #1 is the most T1-like
using real data threshold=19.0
skull bounding box = (64, 61, 25) --> (198, 192, 209)
finding center of left hemi white matter
using (109, 105, 117) as brain centroid of Right_Cerebral_White_Matter...
MRImask(): AllowDiffGeom = 1
mean wm in atlas = 107, using box (93,89,94) --> (125, 121,139) to find MRI wm
before smoothing, mri peak at 101
robust fit to distribution - 103 +- 7.4
after smoothing, mri peak at 104, scaling input intensities by 1.029
scaling channel 0 by 1.02885
initial log_p = -4.206
************************************************
First Search limited to translation only.
************************************************
max log p =    -4.051908 @ (-10.526, -10.526, -10.526)
max log p =    -3.945485 @ (5.263, 5.263, 5.263)
max log p =    -3.878443 @ (-2.632, -2.632, 2.632)
max log p =    -3.864562 @ (-1.316, -1.316, -1.316)
max log p =    -3.832788 @ (3.289, 0.658, -0.658)
max log p =    -3.832788 @ (0.000, 0.000, 0.000)
max log p =    -3.832788 @ (0.000, 0.000, 0.000)
max log p =    -3.832788 @ (0.000, 0.000, 0.000)
Found translation: (-5.9, -8.6, -4.6): log p = -3.833
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 0 nscales = 0 ...
****************************************
Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-3.808, old_max_log_p =-3.833 (thresh=-3.8)
 1.00000   0.00000   0.00000  -5.92106;
 0.00000   0.92500   0.00000   1.03558;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.92500   3.64669;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
iteration took 0 minutes and 19 seconds.
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 1 nscales = 0 ...
****************************************
Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-3.808, old_max_log_p =-3.808 (thresh=-3.8)
 1.00000   0.00000   0.00000  -5.92106;
 0.00000   0.92500   0.00000   1.03558;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.92500   3.64669;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
reducing scale to 0.2500
iteration took 0 minutes and 19 seconds.
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 2 nscales = 1 ...
****************************************
Result so far: scale 0.250: max_log_p=-3.697, old_max_log_p =-3.808 (thresh=-3.8)
 1.03250   0.09395   0.00517  -22.69078;
-0.10353   0.96836   0.09435  -4.96450;
 0.00451  -0.09325   0.93775   15.56584;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
iteration took 0 minutes and 19 seconds.
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 3 nscales = 1 ...
****************************************
Result so far: scale 0.250: max_log_p=-3.697, old_max_log_p =-3.697 (thresh=-3.7)
 1.03250   0.09395   0.00517  -22.69078;
-0.10353   0.96836   0.09435  -4.96450;
 0.00451  -0.09325   0.93775   15.56584;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
reducing scale to 0.0625
iteration took 0 minutes and 19 seconds.
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 4 nscales = 2 ...
****************************************
Result so far: scale 0.062: max_log_p=-3.689, old_max_log_p =-3.697 (thresh=-3.7)
 1.03371   0.09406   0.00517  -22.86556;
-0.10365   0.96949   0.09446  -5.10977;
 0.00450  -0.09303   0.93555   15.77644;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
iteration took 0 minutes and 18 seconds.
****************************************
Nine parameter search.  iteration 5 nscales = 2 ...
****************************************
Result so far: scale 0.062: max_log_p=-3.685, old_max_log_p =-3.689 (thresh=-3.7)
 1.03341   0.08993   0.03566  -25.58376;
-0.10320   0.96366   0.12473  -8.61546;
-0.02584  -0.12726   0.92802   24.18416;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
min search scale 0.025000 reached
***********************************************
Computing MAP estimate using 2841 samples...
***********************************************
dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-05
l_intensity = 1.0000
Aligning input volume to GCA...
Transform matrix
 1.03341   0.08993   0.03566  -25.58376;
-0.10320   0.96366   0.12473  -8.61546;
-0.02584  -0.12726   0.92802   24.18416;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
nsamples 2841
Quasinewton: input matrix
 1.03341   0.08993   0.03566  -25.58376;
-0.10320   0.96366   0.12473  -8.61546;
-0.02584  -0.12726   0.92802   24.18416;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
 IFLAG= -1  LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 3 POSSIBLE CAUSES: FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESoutof QuasiNewtonEMA: 008: -log(p) =   -0.0  tol 0.000010
Resulting transform:
 1.03341   0.08993   0.03566  -25.58376;
-0.10320   0.96366   0.12473  -8.61546;
-0.02584  -0.12726   0.92802   24.18416;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;

pass 1, spacing 8: log(p) = -3.685 (old=-4.206)
transform before final EM align:
 1.03341   0.08993   0.03566  -25.58376;
-0.10320   0.96366   0.12473  -8.61546;
-0.02584  -0.12726   0.92802   24.18416;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;

**************************************************
 EM alignment process ...
 Computing final MAP estimate using 315638 samples. 
**************************************************
dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-07
l_intensity = 1.0000
Aligning input volume to GCA...
Transform matrix
 1.03341   0.08993   0.03566  -25.58376;
-0.10320   0.96366   0.12473  -8.61546;
-0.02584  -0.12726   0.92802   24.18416;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
nsamples 315638
Quasinewton: input matrix
 1.03341   0.08993   0.03566  -25.58376;
-0.10320   0.96366   0.12473  -8.61546;
-0.02584  -0.12726   0.92802   24.18416;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
 IFLAG= -1  LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 6 POSSIBLE CAUSES: FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESoutof QuasiNewtonEMA: 010: -log(p) =    4.1  tol 0.000000
final transform:
 1.03341   0.08993   0.03566  -25.58376;
-0.10320   0.96366   0.12473  -8.61546;
-0.02584  -0.12726   0.92802   24.18416;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;

writing output transformation to transforms/talairach.lta...
#VMPC# mri_em_register VmPeak  815192
FSRUNTIME@ mri_em_register  0.0397 hours 4 threads
registration took 2 minutes and 23 seconds.
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:17:39:15 mri_em_register N 7 e 143.07 S 0.41 U 495.80 P 346% M 616536 F 0 R 166677 W 0 c 692 w 123 I 139952 O 16 L 2.71 2.30 1.27
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:17:41:38 mri_em_register N 7 3.35 2.76 1.59
#--------------------------------------
#@# CA Normalize Tue Nov  9 17:41:38 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri

 mri_ca_normalize -c ctrl_pts.mgz -mask brainmask.mgz nu.mgz /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2020-01-02.gca transforms/talairach.lta norm.mgz 

writing control point volume to ctrl_pts.mgz
using MR volume brainmask.mgz to mask input volume...
reading 1 input volume
reading atlas from '/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2020-01-02.gca'...
reading transform from 'transforms/talairach.lta'...
reading input volume from nu.mgz...
resetting wm mean[0]: 98 --> 107
resetting gm mean[0]: 61 --> 61
input volume #1 is the most T1-like
using real data threshold=18.0
skull bounding box = (64, 61, 25) --> (198, 192, 209)
finding center of left hemi white matter
using (109, 105, 117) as brain centroid of Right_Cerebral_White_Matter...
mean wm in atlas = 107, using box (93,89,94) --> (125, 121,139) to find MRI wm
before smoothing, mri peak at 101
robust fit to distribution - 103 +- 7.4
after smoothing, mri peak at 104, scaling input intensities by 1.029
scaling channel 0 by 1.02885
using 246437 sample points...
INFO: compute sample coordinates transform
 1.03341   0.08993   0.03566  -25.58376;
-0.10320   0.96366   0.12473  -8.61546;
-0.02584  -0.12726   0.92802   24.18416;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
INFO: transform used
finding control points in Left_Cerebral_White_Matter....
found 40230 control points for structure...
bounding box (130, 65, 27) --> (197, 185, 205)
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 107.0 --> 132.0
5 of 13 (38.5%) samples deleted
finding control points in Right_Cerebral_White_Matter....
found 39478 control points for structure...
bounding box (68, 65, 25) --> (135, 180, 204)
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 117.0 --> 132.0
8 of 9 (88.9%) samples deleted
finding control points in Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter....
found 3105 control points for structure...
bounding box (130, 152, 55) --> (176, 203, 113)
finding control points in Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter....
found 2710 control points for structure...
bounding box (85, 152, 51) --> (131, 196, 113)
finding control points in Brain_Stem....
found 3475 control points for structure...
bounding box (112, 143, 93) --> (147, 215, 125)
Brain_Stem: limiting intensities to 96.0 --> 132.0
1 of 7 (14.3%) samples deleted
using 29 total control points for intensity normalization...
bias field = 0.811 +- 0.098
0 of 15 control points discarded
finding control points in Left_Cerebral_White_Matter....
found 40230 control points for structure...
bounding box (130, 65, 27) --> (197, 185, 205)
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 95.0 --> 132.0
68 of 168 (40.5%) samples deleted
finding control points in Right_Cerebral_White_Matter....
found 39478 control points for structure...
bounding box (68, 65, 25) --> (135, 180, 204)
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 101.0 --> 132.0
61 of 79 (77.2%) samples deleted
finding control points in Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter....
found 3105 control points for structure...
bounding box (130, 152, 55) --> (176, 203, 113)
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 88.0 --> 132.0
21 of 32 (65.6%) samples deleted
finding control points in Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter....
found 2710 control points for structure...
bounding box (85, 152, 51) --> (131, 196, 113)
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 88.0 --> 132.0
5 of 8 (62.5%) samples deleted
finding control points in Brain_Stem....
found 3475 control points for structure...
bounding box (112, 143, 93) --> (147, 215, 125)
Brain_Stem: limiting intensities to 88.0 --> 132.0
41 of 63 (65.1%) samples deleted
using 350 total control points for intensity normalization...
bias field = 1.007 +- 0.076
0 of 151 control points discarded
finding control points in Left_Cerebral_White_Matter....
found 40230 control points for structure...
bounding box (130, 65, 27) --> (197, 185, 205)
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 88.0 --> 132.0
13 of 219 (5.9%) samples deleted
finding control points in Right_Cerebral_White_Matter....
found 39478 control points for structure...
bounding box (68, 65, 25) --> (135, 180, 204)
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 88.0 --> 132.0
55 of 242 (22.7%) samples deleted
finding control points in Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter....
found 3105 control points for structure...
bounding box (130, 152, 55) --> (176, 203, 113)
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 88.0 --> 132.0
10 of 14 (71.4%) samples deleted
finding control points in Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter....
found 2710 control points for structure...
bounding box (85, 152, 51) --> (131, 196, 113)
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 88.0 --> 132.0
10 of 15 (66.7%) samples deleted
finding control points in Brain_Stem....
found 3475 control points for structure...
bounding box (112, 143, 93) --> (147, 215, 125)
Brain_Stem: limiting intensities to 88.0 --> 132.0
42 of 60 (70.0%) samples deleted
using 550 total control points for intensity normalization...
bias field = 1.051 +- 0.081
0 of 419 control points discarded
writing normalized volume to norm.mgz...
writing control points to ctrl_pts.mgz
freeing GCA...done.
normalization took 1 minutes and 7 seconds.
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:17:41:38 mri_ca_normalize N 8 e 66.73 S 0.37 U 70.08 P 105% M 677660 F 5 R 408216 W 0 c 259 w 228 I 1352 O 3984 L 3.35 2.76 1.59
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:17:42:44 mri_ca_normalize N 8 1.79 2.42 1.55
#--------------------------------------
#@# CA Reg Tue Nov  9 17:42:44 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri

 mri_ca_register -nobigventricles -T transforms/talairach.lta -align-after -mask brainmask.mgz norm.mgz /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2020-01-02.gca transforms/talairach.m3z 

not handling expanded ventricles...
using previously computed transform transforms/talairach.lta
renormalizing sequences with structure alignment, equivalent to:
	-renormalize
	-regularize_mean 0.500
	-regularize 0.500
using MR volume brainmask.mgz to mask input volume...

== Number of threads available to mri_ca_register for OpenMP = 4 == 
reading 1 input volumes...
logging results to talairach.log
reading input volume 'norm.mgz'...
reading GCA '/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2020-01-02.gca'...
label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%)
freeing gibbs priors...done.
average std[0] = 5.0
Starting GCAMregister()
label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%)
npasses = 1, nlevels = 6
#pass# 1 of 1 ************************
enabling zero nodes
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 0.156

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 5 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.16 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=256, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.958015
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=315.889,rms=0.85455) vs oldopt=(dt=369.92,rms=0.8582)
#GCMRL#    0 dt 315.888634 rms  0.855 10.800% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4410 tGradient 2.6420 tsec 9.5590
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=231.097,rms=0.829356) vs oldopt=(dt=92.48,rms=0.83863)
#GCMRL#    1 dt 231.097276 rms  0.829  2.948% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4090 tGradient 2.8560 tsec 9.7500
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=265.392,rms=0.81835) vs oldopt=(dt=369.92,rms=0.819723)
#GCMRL#    2 dt 265.392491 rms  0.818  1.327% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5630 tGradient 2.9160 tsec 9.9760
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=175.673,rms=0.811963) vs oldopt=(dt=92.48,rms=0.813757)
#GCMRL#    3 dt 175.673469 rms  0.812  0.780% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4050 tGradient 2.8380 tsec 9.7230
#GCMRL#    4 dt 369.920000 rms  0.806  0.712% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1020 tGradient 2.6390 tsec 9.1950
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=135.2,rms=0.803059) vs oldopt=(dt=92.48,rms=0.803607)
#GCMRL#    5 dt 135.200000 rms  0.803  0.388% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.8660 tGradient 2.7170 tsec 10.0000
#GCMRL#    6 dt 1479.680000 rms  0.795  0.952% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.3550 tGradient 2.9030 tsec 9.7400
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=129.472,rms=0.791196) vs oldopt=(dt=92.48,rms=0.791445)
#GCMRL#    7 dt 129.472000 rms  0.791  0.530% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4910 tGradient 2.9000 tsec 9.8940
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=295.936,rms=0.790487) vs oldopt=(dt=369.92,rms=0.790511)
#GCMRL#    8 dt 295.936000 rms  0.790  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4760 tGradient 2.7820 tsec 9.7510
#GCMRL#    9 dt 295.936000 rms  0.790  0.065% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 3.1870 tsec 3.6750
#GCMRL#   10 dt 295.936000 rms  0.789  0.169% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7740 tsec 3.2750
#GCMRL#   11 dt 295.936000 rms  0.787  0.221% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 3.0420 tsec 3.5190
#GCMRL#   12 dt 295.936000 rms  0.784  0.307% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 3.1040 tsec 3.5920
#GCMRL#   13 dt 295.936000 rms  0.783  0.221% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8420 tsec 3.3280
#GCMRL#   14 dt 295.936000 rms  0.782  0.154% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6690 tsec 3.1640
#GCMRL#   15 dt 295.936000 rms  0.779  0.310% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 3.0480 tsec 3.5450
#GCMRL#   16 dt 295.936000 rms  0.778  0.185% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 3.0980 tsec 3.5890
#GCMRL#   17 dt 295.936000 rms  0.778  0.001% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7750 tsec 3.2760
#GCMRL#   18 dt 295.936000 rms  0.776  0.210% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.9580 tsec 3.4430
#GCMRL#   19 dt 295.936000 rms  0.774  0.229% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.9300 tsec 3.4120
#GCMRL#   20 dt 295.936000 rms  0.774  0.055% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 3.0880 tsec 3.5860
#GCMRL#   21 dt 295.936000 rms  0.773  0.083% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7530 tsec 3.2470
#GCMRL#   22 dt 295.936000 rms  0.772  0.198% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.9240 tsec 3.4270
#GCMRL#   23 dt 295.936000 rms  0.771  0.113% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.9470 tsec 3.3530
#GCMRL#   24 dt 295.936000 rms  0.771  0.017% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.9220 tsec 3.4220
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=129.472,rms=0.770057) vs oldopt=(dt=92.48,rms=0.770171)
#GCMRL#   25 dt 129.472000 rms  0.770  0.079% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5360 tGradient 3.0730 tsec 10.1070
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=295.936,rms=0.769955) vs oldopt=(dt=369.92,rms=0.769967)
#GCMRL#   26 dt 295.936000 rms  0.770  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.8770 tGradient 2.6810 tsec 10.0610
#GCMRL#   27 dt 295.936000 rms  0.770  0.013% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.9730 tsec 3.4530

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 5 level2 1 tsec 172.817 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.16 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=256, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.770372
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=129.472,rms=0.767232) vs oldopt=(dt=92.48,rms=0.767652)
#GCMRL#   29 dt 129.472000 rms  0.767  0.408% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5260 tGradient 2.9440 tsec 9.9630
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=295.936,rms=0.766438) vs oldopt=(dt=369.92,rms=0.766471)
#GCMRL#   30 dt 295.936000 rms  0.766  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4750 tGradient 2.6200 tsec 9.5930
#GCMRL#   31 dt 295.936000 rms  0.766  0.080% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.9570 tsec 3.4480
#GCMRL#   32 dt 295.936000 rms  0.765  0.072% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8540 tsec 3.3170
#GCMRL#   33 dt 295.936000 rms  0.765  0.050% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8020 tsec 3.3060
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=443.904,rms=0.76456) vs oldopt=(dt=369.92,rms=0.764569)
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 0.615

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 4 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.62 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=64, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.785194
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=36.288,rms=0.783092) vs oldopt=(dt=25.92,rms=0.783247)
#GCMRL#   35 dt  36.288000 rms  0.783  0.268% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4370 tGradient 2.4100 tsec 9.3420
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=36.288,rms=0.782119) vs oldopt=(dt=25.92,rms=0.782305)
#GCMRL#   36 dt  36.288000 rms  0.782  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1140 tGradient 2.5220 tsec 9.1360
#GCMRL#   37 dt  36.288000 rms  0.781  0.129% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.4010 tsec 2.9020
#GCMRL#   38 dt  36.288000 rms  0.780  0.189% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.4910 tsec 2.9810
#GCMRL#   39 dt  36.288000 rms  0.778  0.173% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5980 tsec 3.0990
#GCMRL#   40 dt  36.288000 rms  0.776  0.247% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5120 tsec 2.9860
#GCMRL#   41 dt  36.288000 rms  0.774  0.312% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6110 tsec 3.1000
#GCMRL#   42 dt  36.288000 rms  0.771  0.353% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.4650 tsec 2.9480
#GCMRL#   43 dt  36.288000 rms  0.768  0.394% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7040 tsec 3.2080
#GCMRL#   44 dt  36.288000 rms  0.765  0.395% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5870 tsec 3.0920
#GCMRL#   45 dt  36.288000 rms  0.762  0.352% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6480 tsec 3.1490
#GCMRL#   46 dt  36.288000 rms  0.760  0.267% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.4650 tsec 2.9540
#GCMRL#   47 dt  36.288000 rms  0.759  0.177% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5590 tsec 3.0610
#GCMRL#   48 dt  36.288000 rms  0.758  0.137% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5540 tsec 3.0470
#GCMRL#   49 dt  36.288000 rms  0.757  0.133% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5340 tsec 3.0440
#GCMRL#   50 dt  36.288000 rms  0.756  0.105% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5130 tsec 3.0010
#GCMRL#   51 dt  36.288000 rms  0.756  0.050% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5160 tsec 3.0130
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=9.072,rms=0.755822) vs oldopt=(dt=6.48,rms=0.755823)
#GCMRL#   52 dt   9.072000 rms  0.756  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.9880 tGradient 2.4030 tsec 9.8990
#GCMRL#   53 dt   9.072000 rms  0.756  0.001% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5090 tsec 3.0030

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 4 level2 1 tsec 83.347 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.62 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=64, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.756346
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=36.288,rms=0.754937) vs oldopt=(dt=25.92,rms=0.755049)
#GCMRL#   55 dt  36.288000 rms  0.755  0.186% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4860 tGradient 2.4600 tsec 9.4280
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 2.353

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 3 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=2.35 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=16, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.802986
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=6.4,rms=0.799451) vs oldopt=(dt=8,rms=0.799675)
#GCMRL#   57 dt   6.400000 rms  0.799  0.440% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1930 tGradient 2.7000 tsec 9.3760
#GCMRL#   58 dt   2.000000 rms  0.799  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1520 tGradient 2.3540 tsec 9.0180

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 3 level2 1 tsec 24.572 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=2.35 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=16, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.799778
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.6,rms=0.79925) vs oldopt=(dt=0.5,rms=0.79925)
#GCMRL#   60 dt   0.600000 rms  0.799  0.066% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1610 tGradient 2.2030 tsec 8.8420
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.075,rms=0.799252) vs oldopt=(dt=0.125,rms=0.799252)
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 8.000

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 2 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=8.00 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=4, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.891356
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=2.9318,rms=0.866352) vs oldopt=(dt=2.88,rms=0.866358)
#GCMRL#   62 dt   2.931803 rms  0.866  2.805% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.2140 tGradient 2.2820 tsec 8.9920
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=3.21287,rms=0.858502) vs oldopt=(dt=2.88,rms=0.858589)
#GCMRL#   63 dt   3.212871 rms  0.859  0.906% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1610 tGradient 2.4330 tsec 9.0740
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=2.23125,rms=0.85551) vs oldopt=(dt=2.88,rms=0.855769)
#GCMRL#   64 dt   2.231250 rms  0.856  0.348% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.2190 tGradient 2.3590 tsec 9.0250
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=2.35088,rms=0.854372) vs oldopt=(dt=2.88,rms=0.854439)
#GCMRL#   65 dt   2.350877 rms  0.854  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5030 tGradient 2.2300 tsec 9.2340
#GCMRL#   66 dt   2.350877 rms  0.854  0.095% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2280 tsec 2.7130

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 2 level2 1 tsec 45.218 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=8.00 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=4, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.854018
#GCMRL#   68 dt   0.000000 rms  0.854  0.055% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.8160 tGradient 2.3520 tsec 8.6670
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 20.000

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 1 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=20.00 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=1, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.911198
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.112,rms=0.910595) vs oldopt=(dt=0.08,rms=0.910609)
#GCMRL#   70 dt   0.112000 rms  0.911  0.066% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1170 tGradient 2.1520 tsec 8.7620
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.112,rms=0.910587) vs oldopt=(dt=0.08,rms=0.9106)
#GCMRL#   71 dt   0.112000 rms  0.911  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1740 tGradient 2.0610 tsec 8.7280
#GCMRL#   72 dt   0.112000 rms  0.910  0.027% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.3380 tsec 2.8340
#GCMRL#   73 dt   0.112000 rms  0.910  0.023% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2840 tsec 2.7900
#GCMRL#   74 dt   0.112000 rms  0.910  0.042% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2650 tsec 2.7750
#GCMRL#   75 dt   0.112000 rms  0.909  0.060% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9840 tsec 2.4850
#GCMRL#   76 dt   0.112000 rms  0.908  0.116% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1900 tsec 2.6810
#GCMRL#   77 dt   0.112000 rms  0.907  0.152% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0940 tsec 2.5830
#GCMRL#   78 dt   0.112000 rms  0.905  0.152% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.4920 tsec 2.9890
#GCMRL#   79 dt   0.112000 rms  0.904  0.137% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0820 tsec 2.5860
#GCMRL#   80 dt   0.112000 rms  0.903  0.113% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.3720 tsec 2.8730
#GCMRL#   81 dt   0.112000 rms  0.902  0.092% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1950 tsec 2.7210
#GCMRL#   82 dt   1.280000 rms  0.901  0.179% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1860 tGradient 2.3890 tsec 9.0750
#GCMRL#   83 dt   0.320000 rms  0.900  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.2860 tGradient 2.0550 tsec 8.8110
#GCMRL#   84 dt   0.320000 rms  0.899  0.112% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2620 tsec 2.7470
#GCMRL#   85 dt   0.320000 rms  0.898  0.053% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0660 tsec 2.5660

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 1 level2 1 tsec 74.044 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=20.00 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=1, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.898854
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.096,rms=0.898349) vs oldopt=(dt=0.08,rms=0.89835)
#GCMRL#   87 dt   0.096000 rms  0.898  0.056% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1480 tGradient 2.2770 tsec 8.9320
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.112,rms=0.898331) vs oldopt=(dt=0.08,rms=0.898335)
#GCMRL#   88 dt   0.112000 rms  0.898  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.0940 tGradient 2.2640 tsec 8.8330
#GCMRL#   89 dt   0.112000 rms  0.898  0.005% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2420 tsec 2.7500
#GCMRL#   90 dt   0.112000 rms  0.898  0.004% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2720 tsec 2.7820
#GCMRL#   91 dt   0.112000 rms  0.898  0.007% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1150 tsec 2.5550
#GCMRL#   92 dt   0.112000 rms  0.898  0.011% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1450 tsec 2.6450
#GCMRL#   93 dt   0.112000 rms  0.898  0.011% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1520 tsec 2.6490
#GCMRL#   94 dt   0.112000 rms  0.898  0.016% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2320 tsec 2.6890
resetting metric properties...
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 40.000

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 0 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=40.00 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=0, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.850844
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.197523,rms=0.846387) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.847525)
#GCMRL#   96 dt   0.197523 rms  0.846  0.524% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.0950 tGradient 1.7320 tsec 8.3190
#GCMRL#   97 dt   0.020000 rms  0.846  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.3120 tGradient 1.7300 tsec 8.5610

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 0 level2 1 tsec 22.36 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=40.00 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=0, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.84666
#GCMRL#   99 dt   0.020000 rms  0.846  0.070% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.2180 tGradient 1.6360 tsec 8.3480
#GCMRL#  100 dt   0.050000 rms  0.846  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.8300 tGradient 1.6810 tsec 8.0290
GCAMregister done in 9.72198 min
Starting GCAmapRenormalizeWithAlignment() without scales
renormalizing by structure alignment....
renormalizing input #0
gca peak = 0.10253 (16)
mri peak = 0.10935 (39)
Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.88 x + 0.0 (1188 voxels, overlap=0.151)
Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.50 x + 0.0 (1188 voxels, peak = 30), gca=24.0
gca peak = 0.17690 (16)
mri peak = 0.06221 (25)
Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.59 x + 0.0 (863 voxels, overlap=0.317)
Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.50 x + 0.0 (863 voxels, peak = 25), gca=24.0
gca peak = 0.28275 (96)
mri peak = 0.04337 (94)
Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 1.07 x + 0.0 (427 voxels, overlap=0.632)
Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 1.07 x + 0.0 (427 voxels, peak = 102), gca=102.2
gca peak = 0.18948 (93)
mri peak = 0.07663 (81)
Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 0.86 x + 0.0 (281 voxels, overlap=0.161)
Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 0.86 x + 0.0 (281 voxels, peak = 80), gca=79.5
gca peak = 0.20755 (55)
mri peak = 0.08386 (69)
Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 1.20 x + 0.0 (398 voxels, overlap=0.140)
Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 1.20 x + 0.0 (398 voxels, peak = 66), gca=65.7
gca peak = 0.31831 (58)
mri peak = 0.08748 (73)
Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 1.26 x + 0.0 (362 voxels, overlap=0.017)
Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 1.26 x + 0.0 (362 voxels, peak = 73), gca=73.4
gca peak = 0.11957 (102)
mri peak = 0.05698 (101)
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (62113 voxels, overlap=0.979)
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (62113 voxels, peak = 103), gca=102.5
gca peak = 0.11429 (102)
mri peak = 0.06389 (98)
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (63549 voxels, overlap=0.966)
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (63549 voxels, peak = 103), gca=102.5
gca peak = 0.14521 (59)
mri peak = 0.04122 (83)
Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.48 x + 0.0 (19454 voxels, overlap=0.000)
Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.48 x + 0.0 (19454 voxels, peak = 87), gca=87.0
gca peak = 0.14336 (58)
mri peak = 0.03766 (80)
Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.40 x + 0.0 (21319 voxels, overlap=0.000)
Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.40 x + 0.0 (21319 voxels, peak = 81), gca=81.5
gca peak = 0.13305 (70)
mri peak = 0.08122 (85)
Right_Caudate (50): linear fit = 1.30 x + 0.0 (627 voxels, overlap=0.024)
Right_Caudate (50): linear fit = 1.30 x + 0.0 (627 voxels, peak = 91), gca=91.3
gca peak = 0.15761 (71)
mri peak = 0.08289 (83)
Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.15 x + 0.0 (672 voxels, overlap=0.203)
Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.15 x + 0.0 (672 voxels, peak = 82), gca=82.0
gca peak = 0.13537 (57)
mri peak = 0.04366 (78)
Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.38 x + 0.0 (7322 voxels, overlap=0.001)
Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.38 x + 0.0 (7322 voxels, peak = 79), gca=78.9
gca peak = 0.13487 (56)
mri peak = 0.04535 (72)
Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 1.27 x + 0.0 (9724 voxels, overlap=0.003)
Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 1.27 x + 0.0 (9724 voxels, peak = 71), gca=71.4
gca peak = 0.19040 (84)
mri peak = 0.03561 (69)
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 0.90 x + 0.0 (4114 voxels, overlap=0.378)
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 0.90 x + 0.0 (4114 voxels, peak = 76), gca=76.0
gca peak = 0.18871 (83)
mri peak = 0.04945 (67)
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 0.86 x + 0.0 (4533 voxels, overlap=0.762)
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 0.86 x + 0.0 (4533 voxels, peak = 71), gca=71.0
gca peak = 0.24248 (57)
mri peak = 0.07345 (77)
Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.33 x + 0.0 (195 voxels, overlap=0.069)
Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.33 x + 0.0 (195 voxels, peak = 76), gca=75.5
gca peak = 0.35833 (56)
mri peak = 0.08812 (65)
Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.13 x + 0.0 (380 voxels, overlap=0.316)
Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.13 x + 0.0 (380 voxels, peak = 64), gca=63.6
gca peak = 0.12897 (85)
mri peak = 0.05684 (95)
Left_Thalamus (10): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (3028 voxels, overlap=0.592)
Left_Thalamus (10): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (3028 voxels, peak = 96), gca=95.6
gca peak = 0.13127 (83)
mri peak = 0.06001 (88)
Right_Thalamus (49): linear fit = 1.08 x + 0.0 (2710 voxels, overlap=0.860)
Right_Thalamus (49): linear fit = 1.08 x + 0.0 (2710 voxels, peak = 89), gca=89.2
gca peak = 0.12974 (78)
mri peak = 0.07125 (92)
Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.15 x + 0.0 (1205 voxels, overlap=0.122)
Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.15 x + 0.0 (1205 voxels, peak = 90), gca=90.1
gca peak = 0.17796 (79)
mri peak = 0.06345 (89)
Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (1446 voxels, overlap=0.701)
Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (1446 voxels, peak = 87), gca=86.5
gca peak = 0.10999 (80)
mri peak = 0.07933 (80)
Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (4726 voxels, overlap=0.416)
Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (4726 voxels, peak = 88), gca=87.6
gca peak = 0.13215 (88)
mri peak = 0.08086 (95)
Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.09 x + 0.0 (563 voxels, overlap=0.324)
Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.09 x + 0.0 (563 voxels, peak = 95), gca=95.5
gca peak = 0.11941 (89)
mri peak = 0.06553 (92)
Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (496 voxels, overlap=0.662)
Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (496 voxels, peak = 100), gca=100.1
gca peak = 0.20775 (25)
mri peak = 0.16728 (34)
gca peak = 0.13297 (21)
mri peak = 0.08047 (23)
Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.65 x + 0.0 (296 voxels, overlap=0.400)
Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.65 x + 0.0 (296 voxels, peak = 35), gca=34.8
gca peak Unknown = 0.94777 ( 0)
gca peak Left_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.19087 (28)
gca peak Third_Ventricle = 0.20775 (25)
gca peak Fourth_Ventricle = 0.13297 (21)
gca peak CSF = 0.16821 (33)
gca peak Left_Accumbens_area = 0.32850 (63)
gca peak Left_undetermined = 0.98480 (28)
gca peak Left_vessel = 0.40887 (53)
gca peak Left_choroid_plexus = 0.10898 (46)
gca peak Right_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.17798 (26)
gca peak Right_Accumbens_area = 0.30137 (64)
gca peak Right_vessel = 0.47828 (52)
gca peak Right_choroid_plexus = 0.11612 (45)
gca peak Fifth_Ventricle = 0.59466 (35)
gca peak WM_hypointensities = 0.10053 (78)
gca peak non_WM_hypointensities = 0.07253 (60)
gca peak Optic_Chiasm = 0.25330 (73)
not using caudate to estimate GM means
estimating mean gm scale to be 1.30 x + 0.0
estimating mean wm scale to be 1.00 x + 0.0
estimating mean csf scale to be 1.50 x + 0.0
Right_Pallidum too bright - rescaling by 0.973 (from 1.065) to 99.4 (was 102.2)
saving intensity scales to talairach.label_intensities.txt
GCAmapRenormalizeWithAlignment() took 3.6796 min
noneg pre
Starting GCAMregister()
label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%)
npasses = 1, nlevels = 6
#pass# 1 of 1 ************************
enabling zero nodes
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 0.008

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 5 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.01 
tol=5.00e-02, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=256, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.842361
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=221.952,rms=0.761558) vs oldopt=(dt=369.92,rms=0.784234)
#GCMRL#  102 dt 221.952000 rms  0.762  9.592% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5380 tGradient 2.7020 tsec 9.7160
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=352.286,rms=0.740394) vs oldopt=(dt=369.92,rms=0.740459)
#GCMRL#  103 dt 352.286079 rms  0.740  2.779% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5740 tGradient 2.8610 tsec 9.9220
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=221.952,rms=0.734174) vs oldopt=(dt=369.92,rms=0.735724)
#GCMRL#  104 dt 221.952000 rms  0.734  0.840% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1830 tGradient 2.7530 tsec 9.4260
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=517.888,rms=0.726761) vs oldopt=(dt=369.92,rms=0.727833)
#GCMRL#  105 dt 517.888000 rms  0.727  1.010% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5200 tGradient 2.8590 tsec 9.8700
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=129.472,rms=0.724517) vs oldopt=(dt=92.48,rms=0.724924)
#GCMRL#  106 dt 129.472000 rms  0.725  0.309% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4510 tGradient 2.6610 tsec 9.6070
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=517.888,rms=0.72137) vs oldopt=(dt=369.92,rms=0.721966)
#GCMRL#  107 dt 517.888000 rms  0.721  0.434% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5930 tGradient 2.7560 tsec 9.8330
#GCMRL#  108 dt 369.920000 rms  0.719  0.318% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5110 tGradient 2.7230 tsec 9.7170
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=129.472,rms=0.717948) vs oldopt=(dt=92.48,rms=0.718089)
#GCMRL#  109 dt 129.472000 rms  0.718  0.156% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5130 tGradient 2.7780 tsec 9.7700
#GCMRL#  110 dt 1479.680000 rms  0.715  0.437% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.7060 tGradient 2.9490 tsec 10.1640
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=129.472,rms=0.713196) vs oldopt=(dt=92.48,rms=0.713518)
#GCMRL#  111 dt 129.472000 rms  0.713  0.226% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5280 tGradient 2.9230 tsec 9.8490
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=517.888,rms=0.711777) vs oldopt=(dt=369.92,rms=0.712054)
#GCMRL#  112 dt 517.888000 rms  0.712  0.199% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.0950 tGradient 2.8610 tsec 10.4520
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=129.472,rms=0.711453) vs oldopt=(dt=92.48,rms=0.711489)
#GCMRL#  113 dt 129.472000 rms  0.711  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.6170 tGradient 2.6600 tsec 9.7380
#GCMRL#  114 dt 129.472000 rms  0.711  0.031% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8380 tsec 3.3340
#GCMRL#  115 dt 129.472000 rms  0.711  0.062% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6910 tsec 3.2060
#GCMRL#  116 dt 129.472000 rms  0.710  0.089% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6860 tsec 3.1820
#GCMRL#  117 dt 129.472000 rms  0.709  0.112% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8110 tsec 3.3170
#GCMRL#  118 dt 129.472000 rms  0.708  0.128% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.9890 tsec 3.4880
#GCMRL#  119 dt 129.472000 rms  0.707  0.137% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8950 tsec 3.3810
#GCMRL#  120 dt 129.472000 rms  0.707  0.128% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 3.0430 tsec 3.5450
#GCMRL#  121 dt 129.472000 rms  0.706  0.132% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6950 tsec 3.1360
#GCMRL#  122 dt 129.472000 rms  0.705  0.135% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7430 tsec 3.2290
#GCMRL#  123 dt 129.472000 rms  0.704  0.137% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8990 tsec 3.3960
#GCMRL#  124 dt 129.472000 rms  0.703  0.119% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8580 tsec 3.3620
#GCMRL#  125 dt 129.472000 rms  0.702  0.116% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7880 tsec 3.2810
#GCMRL#  126 dt 129.472000 rms  0.701  0.114% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 3.0160 tsec 3.5280
#GCMRL#  127 dt 129.472000 rms  0.701  0.104% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7650 tsec 3.2660
#GCMRL#  128 dt 129.472000 rms  0.700  0.101% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5030 tsec 3.0050
#GCMRL#  129 dt 129.472000 rms  0.699  0.105% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7880 tsec 3.2860
#GCMRL#  130 dt 129.472000 rms  0.698  0.105% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7320 tsec 3.2390
#GCMRL#  131 dt 129.472000 rms  0.698  0.105% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7290 tsec 3.2260
#GCMRL#  132 dt 129.472000 rms  0.697  0.103% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6530 tsec 3.1500
#GCMRL#  133 dt 129.472000 rms  0.696  0.106% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5730 tsec 3.0830
#GCMRL#  134 dt 129.472000 rms  0.696  0.095% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7800 tsec 3.2650
#GCMRL#  135 dt 129.472000 rms  0.695  0.093% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6630 tsec 3.1560
#GCMRL#  136 dt 129.472000 rms  0.694  0.091% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6490 tsec 3.1500
#GCMRL#  137 dt 129.472000 rms  0.694  0.082% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6360 tsec 3.1350
#GCMRL#  138 dt 129.472000 rms  0.693  0.077% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6190 tsec 3.1220
#GCMRL#  139 dt 129.472000 rms  0.693  0.084% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7990 tsec 3.2990
#GCMRL#  140 dt 129.472000 rms  0.692  0.072% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5460 tsec 3.0400
#GCMRL#  141 dt 129.472000 rms  0.692  0.072% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7530 tsec 3.2670
#GCMRL#  142 dt 129.472000 rms  0.691  0.065% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7640 tsec 3.2590
#GCMRL#  143 dt 129.472000 rms  0.691  0.063% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6180 tsec 3.1140
#GCMRL#  144 dt 129.472000 rms  0.690  0.059% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7970 tsec 3.2830
#GCMRL#  145 dt 129.472000 rms  0.690  0.060% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6740 tsec 3.1590
#GCMRL#  146 dt 129.472000 rms  0.689  0.062% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8810 tsec 3.4000
#GCMRL#  147 dt 129.472000 rms  0.689  0.060% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6600 tsec 3.1500
#GCMRL#  148 dt 129.472000 rms  0.689  0.062% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8010 tsec 3.2920
#GCMRL#  149 dt 129.472000 rms  0.688  0.066% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8740 tsec 3.3720
#GCMRL#  150 dt 129.472000 rms  0.688  0.069% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5870 tsec 3.0920
#GCMRL#  151 dt 129.472000 rms  0.687  0.066% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8210 tsec 3.3310
#GCMRL#  152 dt 129.472000 rms  0.687  0.067% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6380 tsec 3.1360
#GCMRL#  153 dt 129.472000 rms  0.686  0.060% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5840 tsec 3.0820
#GCMRL#  154 dt 129.472000 rms  0.686  0.055% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7810 tsec 3.3080
#GCMRL#  155 dt 129.472000 rms  0.686  0.052% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7500 tsec 3.2570
#GCMRL#  156 dt 129.472000 rms  0.685  0.049% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7830 tsec 3.2980
#GCMRL#  157 dt 129.472000 rms  0.685  0.050% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5160 tsec 3.0110
#GCMRL#  158 dt 129.472000 rms  0.685  0.049% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7070 tsec 3.2110
#GCMRL#  159 dt 129.472000 rms  0.684  0.050% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8500 tsec 3.3470
#GCMRL#  160 dt 129.472000 rms  0.684  0.044% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5610 tsec 3.0660
#GCMRL#  161 dt 129.472000 rms  0.684  0.042% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.9800 tsec 3.4750
#GCMRL#  162 dt 129.472000 rms  0.683  0.041% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7170 tsec 3.2240
#GCMRL#  163 dt 129.472000 rms  0.683  0.038% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7680 tsec 3.2640
#GCMRL#  164 dt 129.472000 rms  0.683  0.037% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8570 tsec 3.3530
#GCMRL#  165 dt 129.472000 rms  0.683  0.036% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 3.0000 tsec 3.5010
#GCMRL#  166 dt 129.472000 rms  0.682  0.035% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6950 tsec 3.2010
#GCMRL#  167 dt 129.472000 rms  0.682  0.035% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6630 tsec 3.1590
#GCMRL#  168 dt 129.472000 rms  0.682  0.032% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6230 tsec 3.1220
#GCMRL#  169 dt 129.472000 rms  0.682  0.029% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7810 tsec 3.2840
#GCMRL#  170 dt 129.472000 rms  0.682  0.026% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7790 tsec 3.2840
#GCMRL#  171 dt 129.472000 rms  0.681  0.024% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6500 tsec 3.1490
#GCMRL#  172 dt 129.472000 rms  0.681  0.026% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6430 tsec 3.1420
#GCMRL#  173 dt 129.472000 rms  0.681  0.031% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6320 tsec 3.1340
#GCMRL#  174 dt 129.472000 rms  0.681  0.030% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7150 tsec 3.2120
#GCMRL#  175 dt 129.472000 rms  0.681  0.031% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6800 tsec 3.1710
#GCMRL#  176 dt 129.472000 rms  0.680  0.029% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.4860 tsec 2.9640
#GCMRL#  177 dt 129.472000 rms  0.680  0.032% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6740 tsec 3.1750
#GCMRL#  178 dt 129.472000 rms  0.680  0.029% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.4530 tsec 2.9560
#GCMRL#  179 dt 129.472000 rms  0.680  0.031% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7570 tsec 3.2610
#GCMRL#  180 dt 129.472000 rms  0.680  0.029% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.4540 tsec 2.9510
#GCMRL#  181 dt 129.472000 rms  0.679  0.027% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6100 tsec 3.1210
#GCMRL#  182 dt 129.472000 rms  0.679  0.029% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5850 tsec 3.0920
#GCMRL#  183 dt 129.472000 rms  0.679  0.026% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8650 tsec 3.3740
#GCMRL#  184 dt 129.472000 rms  0.679  0.024% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6830 tsec 3.1780
#GCMRL#  185 dt 129.472000 rms  0.679  0.024% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6770 tsec 3.1770
#GCMRL#  186 dt 129.472000 rms  0.678  0.023% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5780 tsec 3.0990
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=2071.55,rms=0.678151) vs oldopt=(dt=1479.68,rms=0.678216)
#GCMRL#  187 dt 2071.552000 rms  0.678  0.050% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.9140 tGradient 2.6910 tsec 10.0860
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=110.976,rms=0.67811) vs oldopt=(dt=92.48,rms=0.678111)
#GCMRL#  188 dt 110.976000 rms  0.678  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.9560 tGradient 2.7150 tsec 10.1720
#GCMRL#  189 dt 110.976000 rms  0.678  0.002% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5030 tsec 2.9990

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 5 level2 1 tsec 383.284 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.01 
tol=5.00e-02, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=256, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.678376
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=221.952,rms=0.677144) vs oldopt=(dt=369.92,rms=0.677364)
#GCMRL#  191 dt 221.952000 rms  0.677  0.182% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5490 tGradient 2.7000 tsec 9.7190
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=1183.74,rms=0.675499) vs oldopt=(dt=1479.68,rms=0.675724)
#GCMRL#  192 dt 1183.744000 rms  0.675  0.243% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.0360 tGradient 2.7220 tsec 10.2260
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=129.472,rms=0.675101) vs oldopt=(dt=92.48,rms=0.675178)
#GCMRL#  193 dt 129.472000 rms  0.675  0.059% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5690 tGradient 2.7570 tsec 9.8010
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=129.472,rms=0.67496) vs oldopt=(dt=92.48,rms=0.674975)
#GCMRL#  194 dt 129.472000 rms  0.675  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.0170 tGradient 2.7460 tsec 10.2420
#GCMRL#  195 dt 129.472000 rms  0.675  0.013% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7790 tsec 3.2800
#GCMRL#  196 dt 129.472000 rms  0.675  0.016% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6260 tsec 3.1130
#GCMRL#  197 dt 129.472000 rms  0.675  0.019% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5850 tsec 3.0920
#GCMRL#  198 dt 129.472000 rms  0.674  0.030% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7150 tsec 3.2200
#GCMRL#  199 dt 129.472000 rms  0.674  0.043% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8010 tsec 3.2900
#GCMRL#  200 dt 129.472000 rms  0.674  0.050% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8130 tsec 3.3120
#GCMRL#  201 dt 129.472000 rms  0.673  0.056% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7510 tsec 3.2520
#GCMRL#  202 dt 129.472000 rms  0.673  0.050% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6350 tsec 3.1350
#GCMRL#  203 dt 129.472000 rms  0.673  0.039% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.8150 tsec 3.3180
#GCMRL#  204 dt 129.472000 rms  0.673  0.038% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7220 tsec 3.2130
#GCMRL#  205 dt 129.472000 rms  0.672  0.028% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6130 tsec 3.1170
#GCMRL#  206 dt 129.472000 rms  0.672  0.024% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.5130 tsec 2.9710
#GCMRL#  207 dt 129.472000 rms  0.672  0.017% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6460 tsec 3.1610
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=1183.74,rms=0.671915) vs oldopt=(dt=1479.68,rms=0.67195)
#GCMRL#  208 dt 1183.744000 rms  0.672  0.031% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5830 tGradient 2.7360 tsec 9.7920
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=129.472,rms=0.671832) vs oldopt=(dt=92.48,rms=0.671853)
#GCMRL#  209 dt 129.472000 rms  0.672  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.7610 tGradient 2.6930 tsec 9.9690
#GCMRL#  210 dt 129.472000 rms  0.672  0.007% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.6090 tsec 3.1050
#GCMRL#  211 dt 129.472000 rms  0.672  0.004% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.7230 tsec 3.2190
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 0.031

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 4 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.03 
tol=5.00e-02, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=64, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.674419
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=82.944,rms=0.672631) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.672765)
#GCMRL#  213 dt  82.944000 rms  0.673  0.265% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.3900 tGradient 2.3230 tsec 9.1890
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=331.776,rms=0.667681) vs oldopt=(dt=414.72,rms=0.667785)
#GCMRL#  214 dt 331.776000 rms  0.668  0.736% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.0010 tGradient 2.2070 tsec 8.6930
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=145.152,rms=0.663826) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.664098)
#GCMRL#  215 dt 145.152000 rms  0.664  0.577% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4650 tGradient 2.2880 tsec 9.2430
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=102.945,rms=0.661235) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.661236)
#GCMRL#  216 dt 102.944681 rms  0.661  0.390% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.7050 tGradient 2.0620 tsec 9.2500
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=124.416,rms=0.659653) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.659688)
#GCMRL#  217 dt 124.416000 rms  0.660  0.239% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.0190 tGradient 2.2130 tsec 8.7160
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=145.152,rms=0.657806) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.657892)
#GCMRL#  218 dt 145.152000 rms  0.658  0.280% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4960 tGradient 2.0400 tsec 9.0180
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=81.8739,rms=0.65637) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.65648)
#GCMRL#  219 dt  81.873874 rms  0.656  0.218% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4610 tGradient 2.1630 tsec 9.1460
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=248.832,rms=0.654157) vs oldopt=(dt=414.72,rms=0.654921)
#GCMRL#  220 dt 248.832000 rms  0.654  0.337% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4070 tGradient 2.1630 tsec 9.0580
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=71.4232,rms=0.652759) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.653065)
#GCMRL#  221 dt  71.423197 rms  0.653  0.214% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5380 tGradient 2.1340 tsec 9.1640
#GCMRL#  222 dt 414.720000 rms  0.651  0.329% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4420 tGradient 2.1120 tsec 9.0430
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=36.288,rms=0.64908) vs oldopt=(dt=25.92,rms=0.649409)
#GCMRL#  223 dt  36.288000 rms  0.649  0.236% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.2990 tGradient 2.0860 tsec 8.8590
#GCMRL#  224 dt 103.680000 rms  0.648  0.136% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4680 tGradient 2.2440 tsec 9.1960
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=124.416,rms=0.647388) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.647417)
#GCMRL#  225 dt 124.416000 rms  0.647  0.125% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4360 tGradient 1.9990 tsec 8.9470
#GCMRL#  226 dt 103.680000 rms  0.647  0.104% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4220 tGradient 2.1850 tsec 9.0980
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=124.416,rms=0.645977) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.645994)
#GCMRL#  227 dt 124.416000 rms  0.646  0.114% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.3690 tGradient 2.3230 tsec 9.1630
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=82.944,rms=0.645345) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.645353)
#GCMRL#  228 dt  82.944000 rms  0.645  0.098% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4430 tGradient 2.1880 tsec 9.0920
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=145.152,rms=0.644491) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.644651)
#GCMRL#  229 dt 145.152000 rms  0.644  0.132% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.3190 tGradient 2.1350 tsec 8.9490
#GCMRL#  230 dt 103.680000 rms  0.644  0.079% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.3880 tGradient 2.0460 tsec 8.9210
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=124.416,rms=0.643291) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.643314)
#GCMRL#  231 dt 124.416000 rms  0.643  0.107% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4210 tGradient 2.1750 tsec 9.0840
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=82.944,rms=0.642893) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.642955)
#GCMRL#  232 dt  82.944000 rms  0.643  0.062% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.3970 tGradient 2.1860 tsec 9.0590
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=145.152,rms=0.641987) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.642137)
#GCMRL#  233 dt 145.152000 rms  0.642  0.141% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.6520 tGradient 2.0960 tsec 9.2270
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=62.208,rms=0.64166) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.641785)
#GCMRL#  234 dt  62.208000 rms  0.642  0.051% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5780 tGradient 2.1660 tsec 9.2440
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=580.608,rms=0.639619) vs oldopt=(dt=414.72,rms=0.639948)
#GCMRL#  235 dt 580.608000 rms  0.640  0.318% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.3060 tGradient 2.0770 tsec 8.8700
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=36.288,rms=0.638716) vs oldopt=(dt=25.92,rms=0.638877)
#GCMRL#  236 dt  36.288000 rms  0.639  0.141% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4490 tGradient 2.1310 tsec 9.0480
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=62.208,rms=0.638496) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.638534)
#GCMRL#  237 dt  62.208000 rms  0.638  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4900 tGradient 2.1610 tsec 9.1440
#GCMRL#  238 dt  62.208000 rms  0.638  0.049% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2050 tsec 2.7110
#GCMRL#  239 dt  62.208000 rms  0.638  0.078% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0400 tsec 2.5310
#GCMRL#  240 dt  62.208000 rms  0.637  0.105% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1320 tsec 2.5860
#GCMRL#  241 dt  62.208000 rms  0.636  0.123% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1600 tsec 2.6550
#GCMRL#  242 dt  62.208000 rms  0.635  0.151% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1280 tsec 2.6260
#GCMRL#  243 dt  62.208000 rms  0.634  0.162% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2080 tsec 2.6730
#GCMRL#  244 dt  62.208000 rms  0.633  0.156% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0560 tsec 2.5330
#GCMRL#  245 dt  62.208000 rms  0.632  0.142% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2570 tsec 2.7640
#GCMRL#  246 dt  62.208000 rms  0.631  0.138% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1130 tsec 2.6050
#GCMRL#  247 dt  62.208000 rms  0.631  0.140% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1520 tsec 2.6400
#GCMRL#  248 dt  62.208000 rms  0.630  0.137% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1600 tsec 2.6580
#GCMRL#  249 dt  62.208000 rms  0.629  0.122% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0280 tsec 2.5270
#GCMRL#  250 dt  62.208000 rms  0.628  0.138% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2090 tsec 2.6990
#GCMRL#  251 dt  62.208000 rms  0.627  0.110% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.3140 tsec 2.8170
#GCMRL#  252 dt  62.208000 rms  0.627  0.105% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1380 tsec 2.6380
#GCMRL#  253 dt  62.208000 rms  0.626  0.112% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2000 tsec 2.6590
#GCMRL#  254 dt  62.208000 rms  0.625  0.116% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1910 tsec 2.6940
#GCMRL#  255 dt  62.208000 rms  0.625  0.110% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1980 tsec 2.6780
#GCMRL#  256 dt  62.208000 rms  0.624  0.099% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1600 tsec 2.6510
#GCMRL#  257 dt  62.208000 rms  0.623  0.093% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1480 tsec 2.6450
#GCMRL#  258 dt  62.208000 rms  0.623  0.106% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1260 tsec 2.6140
#GCMRL#  259 dt  62.208000 rms  0.622  0.097% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1690 tsec 2.6640
#GCMRL#  260 dt  62.208000 rms  0.622  0.097% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2540 tsec 2.7120
#GCMRL#  261 dt  62.208000 rms  0.621  0.089% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1610 tsec 2.6550
#GCMRL#  262 dt  62.208000 rms  0.621  0.075% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1460 tsec 2.6320
#GCMRL#  263 dt  62.208000 rms  0.620  0.079% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1280 tsec 2.6160
#GCMRL#  264 dt  62.208000 rms  0.620  0.080% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1600 tsec 2.6550
#GCMRL#  265 dt  62.208000 rms  0.619  0.068% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9920 tsec 2.5000
#GCMRL#  266 dt  62.208000 rms  0.619  0.064% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1480 tsec 2.6370
#GCMRL#  267 dt  62.208000 rms  0.618  0.066% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2170 tsec 2.7110
#GCMRL#  268 dt  62.208000 rms  0.618  0.066% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2420 tsec 2.7440
#GCMRL#  269 dt  62.208000 rms  0.618  0.062% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2460 tsec 2.7360
#GCMRL#  270 dt  62.208000 rms  0.617  0.057% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2020 tsec 2.6950
#GCMRL#  271 dt  62.208000 rms  0.617  0.053% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2820 tsec 2.7810
#GCMRL#  272 dt  62.208000 rms  0.617  0.043% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1910 tsec 2.6750
#GCMRL#  273 dt  62.208000 rms  0.616  0.044% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1900 tsec 2.6630
#GCMRL#  274 dt  62.208000 rms  0.616  0.038% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2830 tsec 2.7760
#GCMRL#  275 dt  62.208000 rms  0.616  0.037% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1960 tsec 2.6870
#GCMRL#  276 dt  62.208000 rms  0.616  0.040% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1490 tsec 2.6210
#GCMRL#  277 dt  62.208000 rms  0.615  0.042% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1690 tsec 2.6590
#GCMRL#  278 dt  62.208000 rms  0.615  0.037% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2110 tsec 2.7170
#GCMRL#  279 dt  62.208000 rms  0.615  0.036% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1450 tsec 2.6230
#GCMRL#  280 dt  62.208000 rms  0.615  0.037% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1400 tsec 2.6310
#GCMRL#  281 dt  62.208000 rms  0.614  0.044% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2190 tsec 2.7080
#GCMRL#  282 dt  62.208000 rms  0.614  0.041% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0980 tsec 2.5780
#GCMRL#  283 dt  62.208000 rms  0.614  0.047% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1390 tsec 2.6330
#GCMRL#  284 dt  62.208000 rms  0.614  0.043% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1390 tsec 2.6450
#GCMRL#  285 dt  62.208000 rms  0.613  0.040% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1420 tsec 2.6420
#GCMRL#  286 dt  62.208000 rms  0.613  0.030% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1840 tsec 2.6800
#GCMRL#  287 dt  62.208000 rms  0.613  0.023% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1130 tsec 2.6140
#GCMRL#  288 dt  62.208000 rms  0.613  0.025% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1110 tsec 2.5990
#GCMRL#  289 dt  62.208000 rms  0.613  0.030% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2170 tsec 2.7070
#GCMRL#  290 dt  62.208000 rms  0.612  0.035% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0640 tsec 2.5380
#GCMRL#  291 dt  62.208000 rms  0.612  0.041% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1740 tsec 2.6730
#GCMRL#  292 dt  62.208000 rms  0.612  0.020% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1200 tsec 2.6220
#GCMRL#  293 dt  62.208000 rms  0.612  0.027% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2100 tsec 2.7290
#GCMRL#  294 dt  62.208000 rms  0.612  0.024% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1870 tsec 2.6780
#GCMRL#  295 dt  62.208000 rms  0.612  0.020% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2340 tsec 2.7500
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=145.152,rms=0.61155) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.611554)
#GCMRL#  296 dt 145.152000 rms  0.612  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5040 tGradient 2.1170 tsec 9.1370

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 4 level2 1 tsec 395.86 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.03 
tol=5.00e-02, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=64, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.611921
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=145.152,rms=0.608762) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.60897)
#GCMRL#  298 dt 145.152000 rms  0.609  0.516% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.3990 tGradient 2.3030 tsec 9.1890
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=36.288,rms=0.608088) vs oldopt=(dt=25.92,rms=0.608207)
#GCMRL#  299 dt  36.288000 rms  0.608  0.111% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.3430 tGradient 2.2300 tsec 9.0550
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=145.152,rms=0.607265) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.607403)
#GCMRL#  300 dt 145.152000 rms  0.607  0.135% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.3790 tGradient 2.1050 tsec 8.9630
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=124.416,rms=0.606859) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.60686)
#GCMRL#  301 dt 124.416000 rms  0.607  0.067% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1100 tGradient 2.1380 tsec 8.7430
#GCMRL#  302 dt 103.680000 rms  0.607  0.057% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4220 tGradient 2.1110 tsec 9.0240
#GCMRL#  303 dt 103.680000 rms  0.606  0.066% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.3670 tGradient 2.2040 tsec 9.0590
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=36.288,rms=0.60599) vs oldopt=(dt=25.92,rms=0.606)
#GCMRL#  304 dt  36.288000 rms  0.606  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.7820 tGradient 2.1070 tsec 9.3790
#GCMRL#  305 dt  36.288000 rms  0.606  0.012% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2150 tsec 2.6980
#GCMRL#  306 dt  36.288000 rms  0.606  0.025% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1480 tsec 2.6400
#GCMRL#  307 dt  36.288000 rms  0.606  0.035% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1170 tsec 2.6050
#GCMRL#  308 dt  36.288000 rms  0.605  0.045% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1510 tsec 2.6420
#GCMRL#  309 dt  36.288000 rms  0.605  0.047% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1390 tsec 2.6280
#GCMRL#  310 dt  36.288000 rms  0.605  0.052% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1540 tsec 2.6450
#GCMRL#  311 dt  36.288000 rms  0.604  0.049% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1480 tsec 2.6440
#GCMRL#  312 dt  36.288000 rms  0.604  0.049% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1390 tsec 2.6300
#GCMRL#  313 dt  36.288000 rms  0.604  0.051% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2560 tsec 2.7490
#GCMRL#  314 dt  36.288000 rms  0.603  0.055% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1050 tsec 2.6040
#GCMRL#  315 dt  36.288000 rms  0.603  0.057% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1120 tsec 2.6120
#GCMRL#  316 dt  36.288000 rms  0.603  0.057% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2000 tsec 2.6640
#GCMRL#  317 dt  36.288000 rms  0.602  0.055% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2700 tsec 2.7700
#GCMRL#  318 dt  36.288000 rms  0.602  0.047% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1990 tsec 2.6880
#GCMRL#  319 dt  36.288000 rms  0.602  0.045% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2080 tsec 2.6990
#GCMRL#  320 dt  36.288000 rms  0.602  0.038% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2430 tsec 2.7330
#GCMRL#  321 dt  36.288000 rms  0.601  0.038% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0550 tsec 2.5420
#GCMRL#  322 dt  36.288000 rms  0.601  0.031% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2200 tsec 2.7250
#GCMRL#  323 dt  36.288000 rms  0.601  0.029% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1960 tsec 2.6860
#GCMRL#  324 dt  36.288000 rms  0.601  0.033% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1190 tsec 2.6280
#GCMRL#  325 dt  36.288000 rms  0.601  0.032% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1640 tsec 2.6300
#GCMRL#  326 dt  36.288000 rms  0.600  0.033% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0350 tsec 2.5270
#GCMRL#  327 dt  36.288000 rms  0.600  0.035% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1980 tsec 2.6860
#GCMRL#  328 dt  36.288000 rms  0.600  0.038% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2760 tsec 2.7590
#GCMRL#  329 dt  36.288000 rms  0.600  0.036% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1990 tsec 2.6820
#GCMRL#  330 dt  36.288000 rms  0.600  0.028% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1520 tsec 2.6440
#GCMRL#  331 dt  36.288000 rms  0.599  0.029% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2000 tsec 2.6830
#GCMRL#  332 dt  36.288000 rms  0.599  0.024% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1520 tsec 2.6380
#GCMRL#  333 dt  36.288000 rms  0.599  0.022% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1840 tsec 2.6840
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=145.152,rms=0.599082) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.599109)
#GCMRL#  334 dt 145.152000 rms  0.599  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.3590 tGradient 2.2250 tsec 9.0920
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 0.118

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 3 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.12 
tol=5.00e-02, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=16, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.611937
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=11.2,rms=0.611105) vs oldopt=(dt=8,rms=0.61118)
#GCMRL#  336 dt  11.200000 rms  0.611  0.136% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5260 tGradient 1.9480 tsec 8.9680
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=11.2,rms=0.610782) vs oldopt=(dt=8,rms=0.610837)
#GCMRL#  337 dt  11.200000 rms  0.611  0.053% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4260 tGradient 2.0680 tsec 8.9800
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=11.2,rms=0.610538) vs oldopt=(dt=8,rms=0.610593)
#GCMRL#  338 dt  11.200000 rms  0.611  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4660 tGradient 2.1950 tsec 9.1760
#GCMRL#  339 dt  11.200000 rms  0.610  0.043% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2100 tsec 2.7040
#GCMRL#  340 dt  11.200000 rms  0.610  0.042% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8880 tsec 2.3870
#GCMRL#  341 dt  11.200000 rms  0.610  0.026% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9500 tsec 2.4190
#GCMRL#  342 dt  11.200000 rms  0.610  0.057% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9880 tsec 2.4880
#GCMRL#  343 dt  11.200000 rms  0.609  0.111% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9220 tsec 2.4150
#GCMRL#  344 dt  11.200000 rms  0.608  0.187% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0540 tsec 2.5520
#GCMRL#  345 dt  11.200000 rms  0.606  0.255% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9500 tsec 2.4480
#GCMRL#  346 dt  11.200000 rms  0.604  0.307% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9940 tsec 2.4810
#GCMRL#  347 dt  11.200000 rms  0.602  0.322% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9750 tsec 2.4640
#GCMRL#  348 dt  11.200000 rms  0.600  0.312% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0070 tsec 2.4870
#GCMRL#  349 dt  11.200000 rms  0.599  0.309% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9600 tsec 2.4510
#GCMRL#  350 dt  11.200000 rms  0.597  0.304% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9310 tsec 2.4290
#GCMRL#  351 dt  11.200000 rms  0.595  0.290% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0080 tsec 2.5040
#GCMRL#  352 dt  11.200000 rms  0.593  0.262% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0190 tsec 2.5140
#GCMRL#  353 dt  11.200000 rms  0.592  0.230% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9660 tsec 2.4740
#GCMRL#  354 dt  11.200000 rms  0.591  0.215% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0960 tsec 2.5890
#GCMRL#  355 dt  11.200000 rms  0.590  0.186% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8550 tsec 2.3530
#GCMRL#  356 dt  11.200000 rms  0.589  0.181% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0930 tsec 2.5780
#GCMRL#  357 dt  11.200000 rms  0.588  0.172% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0190 tsec 2.5120
#GCMRL#  358 dt  11.200000 rms  0.587  0.160% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0750 tsec 2.5710
#GCMRL#  359 dt  11.200000 rms  0.586  0.150% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9910 tsec 2.4850
#GCMRL#  360 dt  11.200000 rms  0.585  0.133% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0140 tsec 2.5060
#GCMRL#  361 dt  11.200000 rms  0.584  0.117% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9920 tsec 2.4830
#GCMRL#  362 dt  11.200000 rms  0.584  0.105% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9260 tsec 2.4280
#GCMRL#  363 dt  11.200000 rms  0.583  0.091% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8740 tsec 2.3620
#GCMRL#  364 dt  11.200000 rms  0.583  0.087% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0460 tsec 2.5320
#GCMRL#  365 dt  11.200000 rms  0.582  0.075% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9960 tsec 2.5010
#GCMRL#  366 dt  11.200000 rms  0.582  0.072% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8710 tsec 2.3700
#GCMRL#  367 dt  11.200000 rms  0.582  0.061% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9090 tsec 2.4070
#GCMRL#  368 dt  11.200000 rms  0.581  0.056% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9780 tsec 2.4720
#GCMRL#  369 dt  11.200000 rms  0.581  0.040% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0480 tsec 2.5090
#GCMRL#  370 dt  11.200000 rms  0.581  0.032% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0100 tsec 2.5070
#GCMRL#  371 dt  11.200000 rms  0.581  0.031% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9760 tsec 2.4620
#GCMRL#  372 dt  11.200000 rms  0.580  0.036% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9240 tsec 2.4180
#GCMRL#  373 dt  11.200000 rms  0.580  0.040% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0510 tsec 2.5470
#GCMRL#  374 dt  11.200000 rms  0.580  0.040% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8580 tsec 2.3510
#GCMRL#  375 dt  11.200000 rms  0.580  0.045% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9960 tsec 2.4920
#GCMRL#  376 dt  11.200000 rms  0.579  0.043% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8880 tsec 2.3870
#GCMRL#  377 dt  11.200000 rms  0.579  0.043% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9750 tsec 2.4760
#GCMRL#  378 dt  11.200000 rms  0.579  0.047% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9670 tsec 2.4690
#GCMRL#  379 dt  11.200000 rms  0.579  0.047% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9220 tsec 2.4160
#GCMRL#  380 dt  11.200000 rms  0.578  0.039% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9870 tsec 2.4820
#GCMRL#  381 dt  11.200000 rms  0.578  0.032% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9330 tsec 2.4320
#GCMRL#  382 dt  11.200000 rms  0.578  0.029% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9270 tsec 2.4110
#GCMRL#  383 dt  11.200000 rms  0.578  0.025% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9790 tsec 2.4710
#GCMRL#  384 dt  11.200000 rms  0.578  0.020% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9750 tsec 2.4900
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=44.8,rms=0.577739) vs oldopt=(dt=32,rms=0.577745)
#GCMRL#  385 dt  44.800000 rms  0.578  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1470 tGradient 2.0140 tsec 8.6720
#GCMRL#  386 dt  44.800000 rms  0.578  0.031% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0710 tsec 2.5200
#GCMRL#  387 dt  44.800000 rms  0.578  0.010% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9230 tsec 2.4180
#GCMRL#  388 dt  44.800000 rms  0.577  0.006% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0810 tsec 2.5910
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=44.8,rms=0.577282) vs oldopt=(dt=32,rms=0.577289)
#GCMRL#  389 dt  44.800000 rms  0.577  0.032% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1990 tGradient 1.9760 tsec 8.6530
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=11.2,rms=0.577291) vs oldopt=(dt=8,rms=0.577294)

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 3 level2 1 tsec 178.169 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.12 
tol=5.00e-02, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=16, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.577568
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=44.8,rms=0.573996) vs oldopt=(dt=32,rms=0.574302)
#GCMRL#  391 dt  44.800000 rms  0.574  0.618% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.6580 tGradient 1.9780 tsec 9.0960
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=38.4,rms=0.573205) vs oldopt=(dt=32,rms=0.573205)
#GCMRL#  392 dt  38.400000 rms  0.573  0.138% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5430 tGradient 1.8610 tsec 8.8960
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=38.4,rms=0.57261) vs oldopt=(dt=32,rms=0.572615)
#GCMRL#  393 dt  38.400000 rms  0.573  0.104% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.6140 tGradient 1.8130 tsec 8.8930
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=25.6,rms=0.572177) vs oldopt=(dt=32,rms=0.572179)
#GCMRL#  394 dt  25.600000 rms  0.572  0.076% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.5090 tGradient 1.9650 tsec 8.9620
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=44.8,rms=0.571809) vs oldopt=(dt=32,rms=0.571862)
#GCMRL#  395 dt  44.800000 rms  0.572  0.064% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1670 tGradient 1.9180 tsec 8.5660
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=38.4,rms=0.571477) vs oldopt=(dt=32,rms=0.571482)
#GCMRL#  396 dt  38.400000 rms  0.571  0.058% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.0790 tGradient 1.9410 tsec 8.4980
#GCMRL#  397 dt  32.000000 rms  0.571  0.064% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.9140 tGradient 1.9490 tsec 9.3620
#GCMRL#  398 dt  32.000000 rms  0.571  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.9780 tGradient 2.0020 tsec 9.4870
#GCMRL#  399 dt  32.000000 rms  0.571  0.044% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9580 tsec 2.4530
#GCMRL#  400 dt  32.000000 rms  0.570  0.060% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.7850 tsec 2.2780
#GCMRL#  401 dt  32.000000 rms  0.570  0.065% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9680 tsec 2.4550
#GCMRL#  402 dt  32.000000 rms  0.570  0.053% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8970 tsec 2.3950
#GCMRL#  403 dt  32.000000 rms  0.569  0.062% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9060 tsec 2.4050
#GCMRL#  404 dt  32.000000 rms  0.569  0.066% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0140 tsec 2.5120
#GCMRL#  405 dt  32.000000 rms  0.569  0.040% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8690 tsec 2.3670
#GCMRL#  406 dt  32.000000 rms  0.568  0.063% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9250 tsec 2.3810
#GCMRL#  407 dt  32.000000 rms  0.568  0.070% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8590 tsec 2.3590
#GCMRL#  408 dt  32.000000 rms  0.568  0.066% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8790 tsec 2.3760
#GCMRL#  409 dt  32.000000 rms  0.567  0.060% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.7960 tsec 2.3040
#GCMRL#  410 dt  32.000000 rms  0.567  0.076% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.7400 tsec 2.2390
#GCMRL#  411 dt  32.000000 rms  0.566  0.080% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8520 tsec 2.3520
#GCMRL#  412 dt  32.000000 rms  0.566  0.072% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9940 tsec 2.4860
#GCMRL#  413 dt  32.000000 rms  0.566  0.050% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8510 tsec 2.3440
#GCMRL#  414 dt  32.000000 rms  0.565  0.066% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8150 tsec 2.3080
#GCMRL#  415 dt  32.000000 rms  0.565  0.058% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8890 tsec 2.3920
#GCMRL#  416 dt  32.000000 rms  0.564  0.067% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8130 tsec 2.3090
#GCMRL#  417 dt  32.000000 rms  0.564  0.051% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8450 tsec 2.3420
#GCMRL#  418 dt  32.000000 rms  0.564  0.050% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.7970 tsec 2.2230
#GCMRL#  419 dt  32.000000 rms  0.563  0.088% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8800 tsec 2.2850
#GCMRL#  420 dt  32.000000 rms  0.563  0.062% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8850 tsec 2.3820
#GCMRL#  421 dt  32.000000 rms  0.563  0.059% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9700 tsec 2.4700
#GCMRL#  422 dt  32.000000 rms  0.562  0.049% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8320 tsec 2.3280
#GCMRL#  423 dt  32.000000 rms  0.562  0.077% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9460 tsec 2.4210
#GCMRL#  424 dt  32.000000 rms  0.562  0.044% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.7580 tsec 2.2480
#GCMRL#  425 dt  32.000000 rms  0.562  0.042% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8210 tsec 2.3080
#GCMRL#  426 dt  32.000000 rms  0.561  0.046% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8360 tsec 2.3370
#GCMRL#  427 dt  32.000000 rms  0.561  0.064% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8760 tsec 2.3800
#GCMRL#  428 dt  32.000000 rms  0.561  0.037% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.7960 tsec 2.2920
#GCMRL#  429 dt  32.000000 rms  0.561  0.011% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8830 tsec 2.3370
#GCMRL#  430 dt  32.000000 rms  0.560  0.037% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9540 tsec 2.4430
#GCMRL#  431 dt  32.000000 rms  0.560  0.062% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8990 tsec 2.4010
#GCMRL#  432 dt  32.000000 rms  0.560  0.044% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8120 tsec 2.3090
#GCMRL#  433 dt  32.000000 rms  0.560  0.032% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8850 tsec 2.3840
#GCMRL#  434 dt  32.000000 rms  0.560  0.024% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8220 tsec 2.3100
#GCMRL#  435 dt  32.000000 rms  0.559  0.059% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9530 tsec 2.3740
#GCMRL#  436 dt  32.000000 rms  0.559  0.038% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9390 tsec 2.4320
#GCMRL#  437 dt  32.000000 rms  0.559  0.020% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8470 tsec 2.3500
#GCMRL#  438 dt  32.000000 rms  0.559  0.029% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.7360 tsec 2.2400
#GCMRL#  439 dt  32.000000 rms  0.559  0.037% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.7360 tsec 2.2310
#GCMRL#  440 dt  32.000000 rms  0.558  0.030% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.7720 tsec 2.2720
#GCMRL#  441 dt  32.000000 rms  0.558  0.031% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0010 tsec 2.5060
#GCMRL#  442 dt  32.000000 rms  0.558  0.024% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9180 tsec 2.4110
#GCMRL#  443 dt  32.000000 rms  0.558  0.042% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9160 tsec 2.4220
#GCMRL#  444 dt  32.000000 rms  0.558  0.025% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.7310 tsec 2.2370
#GCMRL#  445 dt  32.000000 rms  0.558  0.002% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8740 tsec 2.3710
#GCMRL#  446 dt  32.000000 rms  0.558  0.019% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9480 tsec 2.3600
#GCMRL#  447 dt  32.000000 rms  0.557  0.030% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9490 tsec 2.4260
#GCMRL#  448 dt  32.000000 rms  0.557  0.015% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8280 tsec 2.3370
#GCMRL#  449 dt  32.000000 rms  0.557  0.020% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8840 tsec 2.3810
#GCMRL#  450 dt  32.000000 rms  0.557  0.029% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9400 tsec 2.4330
#GCMRL#  451 dt  32.000000 rms  0.557  0.020% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8470 tsec 2.3390
#GCMRL#  452 dt  32.000000 rms  0.557 -0.002% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8780 tsec 2.8040
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=6.4,rms=0.556924) vs oldopt=(dt=8,rms=0.556924)
#GCMRL#  453 dt   6.400000 rms  0.557  0.001% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.4960 tGradient 1.9450 tsec 8.9370
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.7,rms=0.556919) vs oldopt=(dt=0.5,rms=0.556919)
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 0.400

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 2 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.40 
tol=5.00e-02, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=4, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.579955
#GCMRL#  455 dt   0.000000 rms  0.580  0.046% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.0760 tGradient 1.8130 tsec 8.3710

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 2 level2 1 tsec 20.047 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.40 
tol=5.00e-02, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=4, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.579955
#GCMRL#  457 dt   0.000000 rms  0.580  0.046% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.0620 tGradient 1.8620 tsec 8.4090
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 1.000

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 1 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=1.00 
tol=5.00e-02, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=1, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.62558
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.768,rms=0.623739) vs oldopt=(dt=1.28,rms=0.624183)
#GCMRL#  459 dt   0.768000 rms  0.624  0.294% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.9630 tGradient 1.7650 tsec 8.2060
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.112,rms=0.623698) vs oldopt=(dt=0.08,rms=0.623704)
#GCMRL#  460 dt   0.112000 rms  0.624  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.1960 tGradient 1.7400 tsec 8.3990
#GCMRL#  461 dt   0.112000 rms  0.624  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8090 tsec 2.3150

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 1 level2 1 tsec 24.482 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=1.00 
tol=5.00e-02, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=1, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.623949
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.448,rms=0.623183) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.623273)
#GCMRL#  463 dt   0.448000 rms  0.623  0.123% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.0140 tGradient 1.8410 tsec 8.3110
#GCMRL#  464 dt   0.320000 rms  0.623  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.0500 tGradient 1.7670 tsec 8.3320
resetting metric properties...
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 2.000

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 0 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=2.00 
tol=5.00e-02, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=0, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.563782
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.448,rms=0.548231) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.552434)
#GCMRL#  466 dt   0.448000 rms  0.548  2.758% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.6550 tGradient 1.3110 tsec 7.4480
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.448,rms=0.545156) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.546043)
#GCMRL#  467 dt   0.448000 rms  0.545  0.561% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.6310 tGradient 1.3120 tsec 7.4260
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.448,rms=0.543555) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.544)
#GCMRL#  468 dt   0.448000 rms  0.544  0.294% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.6940 tGradient 1.3880 tsec 7.5740
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.472222,rms=0.542631) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.542919)
#GCMRL#  469 dt   0.472222 rms  0.543  0.170% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.6660 tGradient 1.3400 tsec 7.4710
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.448,rms=0.541973) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.542156)
#GCMRL#  470 dt   0.448000 rms  0.542  0.121% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.7050 tGradient 1.3520 tsec 7.5620
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.448,rms=0.54149) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.541615)
#GCMRL#  471 dt   0.448000 rms  0.541  0.089% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.7820 tGradient 1.2450 tsec 7.5320
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.448,rms=0.54111) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.541211)
#GCMRL#  472 dt   0.448000 rms  0.541  0.070% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.6530 tGradient 1.1510 tsec 7.2910
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.448,rms=0.540827) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.540896)
#GCMRL#  473 dt   0.448000 rms  0.541  0.052% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.6420 tGradient 1.2370 tsec 7.3670
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.448,rms=0.540574) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.540636)
#GCMRL#  474 dt   0.448000 rms  0.541  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.5980 tGradient 1.2500 tsec 7.3490
#GCMRL#  475 dt   0.448000 rms  0.540  0.032% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.2420 tsec 1.7330
#GCMRL#  476 dt   0.448000 rms  0.540  0.063% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.3550 tsec 1.8610
#GCMRL#  477 dt   0.448000 rms  0.540  0.073% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.3880 tsec 1.8780
#GCMRL#  478 dt   0.448000 rms  0.539  0.068% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.2520 tsec 1.7370
#GCMRL#  479 dt   0.448000 rms  0.539  0.046% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.2560 tsec 1.7440
#GCMRL#  480 dt   0.448000 rms  0.539  0.027% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.3000 tsec 1.8040
#GCMRL#  481 dt   0.448000 rms  0.539  0.008% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.2620 tsec 1.7470
#GCMRL#  482 dt   0.448000 rms  0.539 -0.009% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.3550 tsec 2.2790
#GCMRL#  483 dt   0.080000 rms  0.539  0.001% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.6350 tGradient 1.1780 tsec 7.3220
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.028,rms=0.53886) vs oldopt=(dt=0.02,rms=0.53886)

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 0 level2 1 tsec 99.711 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=2.00 
tol=5.00e-02, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=0, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=no

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.539161
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.384,rms=0.531874) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.532976)
#GCMRL#  485 dt   0.384000 rms  0.532  1.351% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.5930 tGradient 1.2150 tsec 7.2830
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.448,rms=0.529129) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.529882)
#GCMRL#  486 dt   0.448000 rms  0.529  0.516% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.6830 tGradient 1.2150 tsec 7.3950
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.448,rms=0.528406) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.528595)
#GCMRL#  487 dt   0.448000 rms  0.528  0.137% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.7570 tGradient 1.2440 tsec 7.4890
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.448,rms=0.528124) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.52819)
#GCMRL#  488 dt   0.448000 rms  0.528  0.053% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.5700 tGradient 1.2690 tsec 7.3120
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.448,rms=0.528) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.528021)
#GCMRL#  489 dt   0.448000 rms  0.528  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 5.7450 tGradient 1.2690 tsec 7.5280
#GCMRL#  490 dt   0.448000 rms  0.528  0.021% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.2910 tsec 1.8130
#GCMRL#  491 dt   0.448000 rms  0.528  0.011% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.3130 tsec 2.0580
#GCMRL#  492 dt   0.448000 rms  0.528  0.020% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.2660 tsec 1.7490
#GCMRL#  493 dt   0.448000 rms  0.528  0.004% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.3210 tsec 2.0620
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.256,rms=0.527698) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.5277)
GCAMregister done in 28.0358 min
********************* ALLOWING NEGATIVE NODES IN DEFORMATION********************************
noneg post
Starting GCAMregister()
label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%)
npasses = 1, nlevels = 6
#pass# 1 of 1 ************************
enabling zero nodes
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 0.008

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 5 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.01 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=256, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.525607
#GCMRL#  495 dt   0.000000 rms  0.525  0.061% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.9570 tGradient 2.3580 tsec 9.8040

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 5 level2 1 tsec 22.742 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.01 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=256, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.525607
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.0180625,rms=0.525287) vs oldopt=(dt=0.0225781,rms=0.525287)
#GCMRL#  497 dt   0.018063 rms  0.525  0.061% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.2580 tGradient 2.5750 tsec 10.3190
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 0.031

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 4 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.03 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=64, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.525635
#GCMRL#  499 dt   0.000000 rms  0.525  0.061% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.9630 tGradient 2.1490 tsec 9.5980

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 4 level2 1 tsec 22.352 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.03 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=64, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.525635
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=80.7943,rms=0.5243) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.524387)
#GCMRL#  501 dt  80.794326 rms  0.524  0.254% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.2850 tGradient 2.0930 tsec 9.8670
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=76.6131,rms=0.523395) vs oldopt=(dt=103.68,rms=0.523484)
#GCMRL#  502 dt  76.613139 rms  0.523  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.3640 tGradient 1.9870 tsec 9.8710
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 0.118

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 3 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.12 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=16, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.523835
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=9.6,rms=0.522816) vs oldopt=(dt=8,rms=0.522848)
#GCMRL#  504 dt   9.600000 rms  0.523  0.194% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.2650 tGradient 1.8440 tsec 9.5880
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=4.8,rms=0.522708) vs oldopt=(dt=8,rms=0.522729)
#GCMRL#  505 dt   4.800000 rms  0.523  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.1750 tGradient 1.9020 tsec 9.5630
#GCMRL#  506 dt   4.800000 rms  0.523  0.002% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.7330 tsec 2.1380

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 3 level2 1 tsec 26.809 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.12 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=16, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.522998
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=44.8,rms=0.517171) vs oldopt=(dt=32,rms=0.517645)
#GCMRL#  508 dt  44.800000 rms  0.517  1.114% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.2730 tGradient 2.0220 tsec 9.7810
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=24.7887,rms=0.515291) vs oldopt=(dt=32,rms=0.515508)
#GCMRL#  509 dt  24.788732 rms  0.515  0.363% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.2310 tGradient 1.9810 tsec 9.6960
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=44.8,rms=0.514085) vs oldopt=(dt=32,rms=0.514147)
#GCMRL#  510 dt  44.800000 rms  0.514  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.3150 tGradient 1.7790 tsec 9.5790
iter 0, gcam->neg = 1
after 1 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  511 dt  44.800000 rms  0.514  0.011% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9290 tsec 3.5600
#GCMRL#  512 dt  44.800000 rms  0.511  0.515% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.7970 tsec 2.2930
#GCMRL#  513 dt  44.800000 rms  0.509  0.440% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9790 tsec 2.4740
#GCMRL#  514 dt  44.800000 rms  0.507  0.347% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.8720 tsec 2.3730
#GCMRL#  515 dt  44.800000 rms  0.506  0.254% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0150 tsec 2.5050
#GCMRL#  516 dt  44.800000 rms  0.505  0.269% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0300 tsec 2.5150
#GCMRL#  517 dt  44.800000 rms  0.504  0.226% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.7870 tsec 2.2800
#GCMRL#  518 dt  44.800000 rms  0.502  0.215% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9030 tsec 2.3980
#GCMRL#  519 dt  44.800000 rms  0.502  0.042% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9930 tsec 2.4780
#GCMRL#  520 dt  44.800000 rms  0.502  0.100% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9890 tsec 2.4600
#GCMRL#  521 dt  44.800000 rms  0.501  0.134% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9920 tsec 2.4750
#GCMRL#  522 dt  44.800000 rms  0.501  0.066% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.0950 tsec 2.5940
#GCMRL#  523 dt  44.800000 rms  0.501  0.052% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9560 tsec 2.4660
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=11.2,rms=0.499926) vs oldopt=(dt=8,rms=0.500037)
#GCMRL#  524 dt  11.200000 rms  0.500  0.116% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.1730 tGradient 1.9990 tsec 9.6660
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=25.6,rms=0.499652) vs oldopt=(dt=32,rms=0.499661)
#GCMRL#  525 dt  25.600000 rms  0.500  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.2200 tGradient 2.1630 tsec 9.8750
#GCMRL#  526 dt  25.600000 rms  0.500  0.007% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1240 tsec 2.6210
#GCMRL#  527 dt  25.600000 rms  0.500  0.020% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.2770 tsec 2.7590
#GCMRL#  528 dt  25.600000 rms  0.499  0.021% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1690 tsec 2.6670
#GCMRL#  529 dt  25.600000 rms  0.499  0.008% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 2.1390 tsec 2.6520
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 0.400

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 2 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.40 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=4, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.503661
#GCMRL#  531 dt   0.000000 rms  0.503  0.068% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.9810 tGradient 1.9830 tsec 9.4620

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 2 level2 1 tsec 22.138 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.40 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=4, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.503661
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=2.2,rms=0.503235) vs oldopt=(dt=2.88,rms=0.503242)
#GCMRL#  533 dt   2.200000 rms  0.503  0.085% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.4150 tGradient 2.0670 tsec 9.9850
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=1.008,rms=0.503209) vs oldopt=(dt=0.72,rms=0.503213)
#GCMRL#  534 dt   1.008000 rms  0.503  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.3800 tGradient 1.8790 tsec 9.7680
#GCMRL#  535 dt   1.008000 rms  0.503  0.002% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.9980 tsec 2.4870
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 1.000

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 1 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=1.00 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=1, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.510648
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.256,rms=0.510283) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.510285)
#GCMRL#  537 dt   0.256000 rms  0.510  0.072% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.1560 tGradient 1.7160 tsec 9.3620
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.028,rms=0.510289) vs oldopt=(dt=0.02,rms=0.510289)

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 1 level2 1 tsec 22.347 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=1.00 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=1, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.510598
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=1.792,rms=0.508563) vs oldopt=(dt=1.28,rms=0.508693)
#GCMRL#  539 dt   1.792000 rms  0.509  0.398% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.1150 tGradient 1.9770 tsec 9.5620
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=1.792,rms=0.508084) vs oldopt=(dt=1.28,rms=0.508117)
#GCMRL#  540 dt   1.792000 rms  0.508  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.3670 tGradient 2.0720 tsec 9.9390
#GCMRL#  541 dt   1.792000 rms  0.508  0.027% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.7700 tsec 2.2810
resetting metric properties...
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 2.000

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 0 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=2.00 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=0, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.503145
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=1.91735,rms=0.471358) vs oldopt=(dt=1.28,rms=0.475104)
iter 0, gcam->neg = 356
after 15 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  543 dt   1.917348 rms  0.473  5.929% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.2490 tGradient 1.3110 tsec 15.1710
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.048,rms=0.473206) vs oldopt=(dt=0.08,rms=0.473235)
#GCMRL#  544 dt   0.048000 rms  0.473  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.1430 tGradient 1.3470 tsec 8.9940

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 0 level2 1 tsec 29.373 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_label=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=2.00 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=0, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.473606
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.112,rms=0.472484) vs oldopt=(dt=0.08,rms=0.472599)
#GCMRL#  546 dt   0.112000 rms  0.472  0.237% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.0210 tGradient 1.4080 tsec 8.9050
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.028,rms=0.472439) vs oldopt=(dt=0.02,rms=0.472449)
#GCMRL#  547 dt   0.028000 rms  0.472  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.2410 tGradient 1.2990 tsec 9.0450
#GCMRL#  548 dt   0.028000 rms  0.472  0.002% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.2360 tsec 1.7250
label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%)
GCAMregister done in 6.09767 min
Starting GCAMcomputeMaxPriorLabels()
Morphing with label term set to 0 *******************************
Starting GCAMregister()
label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%)
npasses = 1, nlevels = 6
#pass# 1 of 1 ************************
enabling zero nodes
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 0.008

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 5 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.01 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=256, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.461425

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 5 level2 1 tsec 12.311 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.01 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=256, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.461425
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 0.031

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 4 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.03 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=64, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.461558

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 4 level2 1 tsec 11.67 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.03 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=64, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.461558
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=15.552,rms=0.461513) vs oldopt=(dt=25.92,rms=0.461524)
#GCMRL#  553 dt  15.552000 rms  0.462  0.010% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.3660 tGradient 1.4910 tsec 8.2380
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=9.072,rms=0.461504) vs oldopt=(dt=6.48,rms=0.461505)
#GCMRL#  554 dt   9.072000 rms  0.462  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.8440 tGradient 1.4710 tsec 8.7950
#GCMRL#  555 dt   9.072000 rms  0.462  0.001% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.4880 tsec 1.9790
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 0.118

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 3 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.12 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=16, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.462004
#GCMRL#  557 dt   0.001953 rms  0.462  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.8890 tGradient 1.3220 tsec 8.6840

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 3 level2 1 tsec 20.112 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.12 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=16, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.462004
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=44.8,rms=0.460439) vs oldopt=(dt=32,rms=0.460557)
#GCMRL#  559 dt  44.800000 rms  0.460  0.339% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.8550 tGradient 1.3380 tsec 8.6630
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=44.8,rms=0.459404) vs oldopt=(dt=32,rms=0.459513)
#GCMRL#  560 dt  44.800000 rms  0.459  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.8020 tGradient 1.1840 tsec 8.4280
#GCMRL#  561 dt  44.800000 rms  0.459  0.023% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.3240 tsec 1.7930
#GCMRL#  562 dt  44.800000 rms  0.458  0.233% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.3190 tsec 1.8000
#GCMRL#  563 dt  44.800000 rms  0.458  0.146% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.2340 tsec 1.7100
iter 0, gcam->neg = 2
after 1 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  564 dt  44.800000 rms  0.457  0.158% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.3180 tsec 2.6900
#GCMRL#  565 dt  44.800000 rms  0.456  0.104% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.3130 tsec 1.7920
iter 0, gcam->neg = 1
after 1 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  566 dt  44.800000 rms  0.456  0.103% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.2020 tsec 2.6250
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=11.2,rms=0.455556) vs oldopt=(dt=8,rms=0.455624)
#GCMRL#  567 dt  11.200000 rms  0.456  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.8890 tGradient 1.3260 tsec 8.7160
#GCMRL#  568 dt  11.200000 rms  0.455  0.021% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.3350 tsec 1.8180
#GCMRL#  569 dt  11.200000 rms  0.455  0.024% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.3380 tsec 1.8150
#GCMRL#  570 dt  11.200000 rms  0.455  0.024% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.3170 tsec 1.8150
#GCMRL#  571 dt  11.200000 rms  0.455  0.025% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.3240 tsec 1.8040
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 0.400

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 2 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.40 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=4, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.457987

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 2 level2 1 tsec 11.491 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=0.40 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=4, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.457987
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=12.2353,rms=0.45692) vs oldopt=(dt=11.52,rms=0.456924)
#GCMRL#  574 dt  12.235294 rms  0.457  0.233% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.9160 tGradient 1.2170 tsec 8.5910
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=30.0812,rms=0.455365) vs oldopt=(dt=46.08,rms=0.455861)
iter 0, gcam->neg = 2
after 1 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  575 dt  30.081238 rms  0.455  0.336% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.8730 tGradient 1.2360 tsec 9.5290
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=8.5,rms=0.454794) vs oldopt=(dt=11.52,rms=0.45487)
#GCMRL#  576 dt   8.500000 rms  0.455  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.8550 tGradient 1.2260 tsec 8.5660
#GCMRL#  577 dt   8.500000 rms  0.454  0.080% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.2440 tsec 1.7240
#GCMRL#  578 dt   8.500000 rms  0.454  0.115% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.1040 tsec 1.5880
iter 0, gcam->neg = 3
after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  579 dt   8.500000 rms  0.453  0.155% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.2320 tsec 2.3730
#GCMRL#  580 dt   8.500000 rms  0.453  0.136% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.1140 tsec 1.5970
#GCMRL#  581 dt   8.500000 rms  0.452  0.125% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.2100 tsec 1.7030
iter 0, gcam->neg = 2
after 1 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  582 dt   8.500000 rms  0.452  0.099% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 1.2380 tsec 2.7040
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=9.216,rms=0.451482) vs oldopt=(dt=11.52,rms=0.451484)
iter 0, gcam->neg = 1
after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  583 dt   9.216000 rms  0.451  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.8870 tGradient 1.2200 tsec 9.2380
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 1.000

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 1 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=1.00 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=1, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.456412

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 1 level2 1 tsec 11.299 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=1.00 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=1, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.456412
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=6e-05,rms=0.456411) vs oldopt=(dt=5e-05,rms=0.456411)
#GCMRL#  586 dt   0.000060 rms  0.456  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 8.5630 tGradient 1.1700 tsec 10.2100
resetting metric properties...
setting smoothness cost coefficient to 2.000

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 0 level2 0 tsec 0 sigma 2
l_jacobian=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=2.00 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=0, sigma=2.0,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.448164
iter 0, gcam->neg = 269
after 15 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  588 dt   1.280000 rms  0.441  1.608% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.8460 tGradient 0.7230 tsec 14.1650
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=2.34375e-05,rms=0.440956) vs oldopt=(dt=1.95313e-05,rms=0.440956)
#GCMRL#  589 dt   0.000023 rms  0.441  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 8.7030 tGradient 0.7540 tsec 9.9120

#GCAMreg# pass 0 level1 0 level2 1 tsec 28.618 sigma 0.5
l_jacobian=1.00 l_log_likelihood=0.20 l_smoothness=2.00 
tol=2.50e-01, dt=5.00e-02, exp_k=20.0, momentum=0.90, levels=6, niter=500, lbl_dist=10.00, avgs=0, sigma=0.5,type=2, relabel=0, neg=yes

blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500...
GCAMRegisterLevel(): init RMS 0.440956
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.256,rms=0.439539) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.439609)
#GCMRL#  591 dt   0.256000 rms  0.440  0.321% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.9010 tGradient 0.7160 tsec 8.0810
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.384,rms=0.438369) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.438418)
#GCMRL#  592 dt   0.384000 rms  0.438  0.266% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.0600 tGradient 0.6880 tsec 8.2270
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.865052,rms=0.435686) vs oldopt=(dt=1.28,rms=0.436322)
iter 0, gcam->neg = 145
after 12 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  593 dt   0.865052 rms  0.437  0.354% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.9800 tGradient 0.6220 tsec 12.9770
#GCMRL#  594 dt   0.320000 rms  0.436  0.000% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 6.9360 tGradient 0.7650 tsec 8.1930
#GCMRL#  595 dt   0.320000 rms  0.436  0.121% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 0.7350 tsec 1.2120
iter 0, gcam->neg = 5
after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  596 dt   0.320000 rms  0.435  0.145% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 0.7250 tsec 1.9250
iter 0, gcam->neg = 9
after 4 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  597 dt   0.320000 rms  0.435  0.129% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 0.7670 tsec 3.4250
iter 0, gcam->neg = 14
after 3 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  598 dt   0.320000 rms  0.434  0.074% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 0.7080 tsec 2.9580
iter 0, gcam->neg = 32
after 12 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  599 dt   0.320000 rms  0.434 -0.091% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 0.0000 tGradient 0.7610 tsec 6.6240
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.112,rms=0.434238) vs oldopt=(dt=0.08,rms=0.434246)
#GCMRL#  600 dt   0.112000 rms  0.434  0.011% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.0720 tGradient 0.7340 tsec 8.2900
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.256,rms=0.434189) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.43419)
iter 0, gcam->neg = 1
after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0
#GCMRL#  601 dt   0.256000 rms  0.434  0.011% neg 0  invalid 762 tFOTS 7.0300 tGradient 0.7490 tsec 8.9890
#FOTS# QuadFit found better minimum quadopt=(dt=0.192,rms=0.434169) vs oldopt=(dt=0.32,rms=0.434175)
GCAMregister done in 5.52678 min
writing output transformation to transforms/talairach.m3z...
GCAMwrite
Calls to gcamLogLikelihoodEnergy 4030 tmin = 5.47098
Calls to gcamLabelEnergy         3415 tmin = 0.853417
Calls to gcamJacobianEnergy      4030 tmin = 4.12385
Calls to gcamSmoothnessEnergy    4030 tmin = 4.86853
Calls to gcamLogLikelihoodTerm 603 tmin = 1.3823
Calls to gcamLabelTerm         550 tmin = 6.8639
Calls to gcamJacobianTerm      603 tmin = 2.98478
Calls to gcamSmoothnessTerm    603 tmin = 1.38178
Calls to gcamComputeGradient    603 tmin = 21.2686
Calls to gcamComputeMetricProperties    5581 tmin = 6.5715
mri_ca_register took 0 hours, 53 minutes and 15 seconds.
#VMPC# mri_ca_register VmPeak  2325672
FSRUNTIME@ mri_ca_register  0.8874 hours 4 threads
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:17:42:44 mri_ca_register N 9 e 3194.63 S 1.14 U 9005.12 P 281% M 1320844 F 7 R 721115 W 0 c 19536 w 29653 I 2176 O 64960 L 1.79 2.42 1.55
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:18:35:59 mri_ca_register N 9 3.35 3.14 2.96
#--------------------------------------
#@# SubCort Seg Tue Nov  9 18:35:59 EST 2021

 mri_ca_label -relabel_unlikely 9 .3 -prior 0.5 -align norm.mgz transforms/talairach.m3z /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2020-01-02.gca aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz 

sysname  Linux
hostname Ishita-Ubuntu
machine  x86_64

setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects
cd /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri
mri_ca_label -relabel_unlikely 9 .3 -prior 0.5 -align norm.mgz transforms/talairach.m3z /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2020-01-02.gca aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz 

relabeling unlikely voxels with window_size = 9 and prior threshold 0.30
using Gibbs prior factor = 0.500
renormalizing sequences with structure alignment, equivalent to:
	-renormalize
	-renormalize_mean 0.500
	-regularize 0.500

== Number of threads available to for OpenMP = 4 == 
reading 1 input volumes
reading classifier array from /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2020-01-02.gca
reading input volume from norm.mgz
average std[0] = 7.2
reading transform from transforms/talairach.m3z
setting orig areas to linear transform determinant scaled 8.42
Atlas used for the 3D morph was /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2020-01-02.gca
average std = 7.2   using min determinant for regularization = 5.2
0 singular and 0 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized
labeling volume...
renormalizing by structure alignment....
renormalizing input #0
gca peak = 0.15521 (20)
mri peak = 0.08977 (39)
Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.88 x + 0.0 (2087 voxels, overlap=0.055)
Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.50 x + 0.0 (2087 voxels, peak = 38), gca=30.0
gca peak = 0.20380 (13)
mri peak = 0.06346 (28)
Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.89 x + 0.0 (1277 voxels, overlap=0.322)
Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.50 x + 0.0 (1277 voxels, peak = 25), gca=19.5
gca peak = 0.26283 (96)
mri peak = 0.07283 (99)
Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 1.05 x + 0.0 (347 voxels, overlap=0.956)
Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 1.05 x + 0.0 (347 voxels, peak = 101), gca=101.3
gca peak = 0.15814 (97)
mri peak = 0.06654 (98)
Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 1.03 x + 0.0 (139 voxels, overlap=0.848)
Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 1.03 x + 0.0 (139 voxels, peak = 100), gca=100.4
gca peak = 0.27624 (56)
mri peak = 0.07964 (67)
Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 1.21 x + 0.0 (429 voxels, overlap=0.022)
Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 1.21 x + 0.0 (429 voxels, peak = 67), gca=67.5
gca peak = 0.28723 (59)
mri peak = 0.10243 (80)
Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 1.35 x + 0.0 (381 voxels, overlap=0.027)
Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 1.35 x + 0.0 (381 voxels, peak = 79), gca=79.4
gca peak = 0.07623 (103)
mri peak = 0.05540 (101)
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.01 x + 0.0 (41334 voxels, overlap=0.901)
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.01 x + 0.0 (41334 voxels, peak = 105), gca=104.5
gca peak = 0.07837 (105)
mri peak = 0.06051 (102)
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (43076 voxels, overlap=0.882)
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (43076 voxels, peak = 106), gca=105.5
gca peak = 0.10165 (58)
mri peak = 0.04418 (88)
Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.47 x + 0.0 (25103 voxels, overlap=0.000)
Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.47 x + 0.0 (25103 voxels, peak = 85), gca=85.0
gca peak = 0.11113 (58)
mri peak = 0.03911 (80)
Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.40 x + 0.0 (24552 voxels, overlap=0.000)
Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.40 x + 0.0 (24552 voxels, peak = 81), gca=81.5
gca peak = 0.27796 (67)
mri peak = 0.09532 (91)
Right_Caudate (50): linear fit = 1.29 x + 0.0 (601 voxels, overlap=0.026)
Right_Caudate (50): linear fit = 1.29 x + 0.0 (601 voxels, peak = 87), gca=86.8
gca peak = 0.14473 (69)
mri peak = 0.09326 (83)
Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.13 x + 0.0 (674 voxels, overlap=0.228)
Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.13 x + 0.0 (674 voxels, peak = 78), gca=78.3
gca peak = 0.14301 (56)
mri peak = 0.05446 (72)
Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.34 x + 0.0 (9415 voxels, overlap=0.002)
Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.34 x + 0.0 (9415 voxels, peak = 75), gca=74.8
gca peak = 0.14610 (55)
mri peak = 0.05719 (67)
Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 1.25 x + 0.0 (10631 voxels, overlap=0.164)
Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 1.25 x + 0.0 (10631 voxels, peak = 68), gca=68.5
gca peak = 0.16309 (85)
mri peak = 0.06982 (87)
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 1.07 x + 0.0 (4367 voxels, overlap=0.892)
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 1.07 x + 0.0 (4367 voxels, peak = 91), gca=90.5
gca peak = 0.15172 (84)
mri peak = 0.06288 (80)
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (4129 voxels, overlap=0.996)
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (4129 voxels, peak = 84), gca=83.6
gca peak = 0.30461 (58)
mri peak = 0.08949 (74)
Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.28 x + 0.0 (257 voxels, overlap=0.061)
Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.28 x + 0.0 (257 voxels, peak = 75), gca=74.5
gca peak = 0.32293 (57)
mri peak = 0.06418 (65)
Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.24 x + 0.0 (385 voxels, overlap=0.311)
Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.24 x + 0.0 (385 voxels, peak = 70), gca=70.4
gca peak = 0.11083 (90)
mri peak = 0.05182 (95)
Left_Thalamus (10): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (2821 voxels, overlap=0.677)
Left_Thalamus (10): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (2821 voxels, peak = 99), gca=98.6
gca peak = 0.11393 (83)
mri peak = 0.06507 (88)
Right_Thalamus (49): linear fit = 1.04 x + 0.0 (2417 voxels, overlap=0.924)
Right_Thalamus (49): linear fit = 1.04 x + 0.0 (2417 voxels, peak = 87), gca=86.7
gca peak = 0.08575 (81)
mri peak = 0.09201 (93)
Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (406 voxels, overlap=0.150)
Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (406 voxels, peak = 91), gca=91.1
gca peak = 0.08618 (78)
mri peak = 0.06667 (89)
Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.11 x + 0.0 (801 voxels, overlap=0.482)
Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.11 x + 0.0 (801 voxels, peak = 86), gca=86.2
gca peak = 0.08005 (78)
mri peak = 0.07810 (83)
Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.09 x + 0.0 (5277 voxels, overlap=0.492)
Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.09 x + 0.0 (5277 voxels, peak = 85), gca=84.6
gca peak = 0.12854 (88)
mri peak = 0.08155 (95)
Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (567 voxels, overlap=0.621)
Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (567 voxels, peak = 96), gca=96.4
gca peak = 0.15703 (87)
mri peak = 0.06326 (94)
Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.15 x + 0.0 (460 voxels, overlap=0.252)
Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.15 x + 0.0 (460 voxels, peak = 100), gca=100.5
gca peak = 0.17522 (25)
mri peak = 0.11322 (38)
gca peak = 0.17113 (14)
mri peak = 0.07080 (23)
Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.96 x + 0.0 (99 voxels, overlap=0.377)
Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.96 x + 0.0 (99 voxels, peak = 27), gca=27.4
gca peak Unknown = 0.94777 ( 0)
gca peak Left_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.16627 (28)
gca peak Third_Ventricle = 0.17522 (25)
gca peak Fourth_Ventricle = 0.17113 (14)
gca peak CSF = 0.20346 (36)
gca peak Left_Accumbens_area = 0.70646 (62)
gca peak Left_undetermined = 1.00000 (28)
gca peak Left_vessel = 0.89917 (53)
gca peak Left_choroid_plexus = 0.11689 (35)
gca peak Right_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.25504 (23)
gca peak Right_Accumbens_area = 0.31650 (65)
gca peak Right_vessel = 0.77268 (52)
gca peak Right_choroid_plexus = 0.13275 (38)
gca peak Fifth_Ventricle = 0.60973 (33)
gca peak WM_hypointensities = 0.11013 (77)
gca peak non_WM_hypointensities = 0.11354 (41)
gca peak Optic_Chiasm = 0.51646 (76)
not using caudate to estimate GM means
estimating mean gm scale to be 1.32 x + 0.0
estimating mean wm scale to be 1.01 x + 0.0
estimating mean csf scale to be 1.50 x + 0.0
saving intensity scales to aseg.auto_noCCseg.label_intensities.txt
renormalizing by structure alignment....
renormalizing input #0
gca peak = 0.14064 (28)
mri peak = 0.08977 (39)
Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.26 x + 0.0 (2087 voxels, overlap=0.680)
Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.26 x + 0.0 (2087 voxels, peak = 35), gca=35.4
gca peak = 0.16931 (19)
mri peak = 0.06346 (28)
Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.29 x + 0.0 (1277 voxels, overlap=0.840)
Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.29 x + 0.0 (1277 voxels, peak = 25), gca=24.6
gca peak = 0.20916 (101)
mri peak = 0.07283 (99)
Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (347 voxels, overlap=1.019)
Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (347 voxels, peak = 104), gca=103.5
gca peak = 0.16036 (98)
mri peak = 0.06654 (98)
Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 1.01 x + 0.0 (139 voxels, overlap=0.936)
Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 1.01 x + 0.0 (139 voxels, peak = 99), gca=99.5
gca peak = 0.25589 (67)
mri peak = 0.07964 (67)
Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (429 voxels, overlap=1.001)
Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (429 voxels, peak = 66), gca=66.0
gca peak = 0.28267 (76)
mri peak = 0.10243 (80)
Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (381 voxels, overlap=1.001)
Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (381 voxels, peak = 75), gca=74.9
gca peak = 0.07890 (105)
mri peak = 0.05540 (101)
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (41334 voxels, overlap=0.914)
Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (41334 voxels, peak = 105), gca=105.0
gca peak = 0.07993 (105)
mri peak = 0.06051 (102)
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (43076 voxels, overlap=0.898)
Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (43076 voxels, peak = 105), gca=105.0
gca peak = 0.06799 (85)
mri peak = 0.04418 (88)
Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (25103 voxels, overlap=0.962)
Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (25103 voxels, peak = 84), gca=83.7
gca peak = 0.08389 (82)
mri peak = 0.03911 (80)
Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (24552 voxels, overlap=0.969)
Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (24552 voxels, peak = 80), gca=80.0
gca peak = 0.19535 (86)
mri peak = 0.09532 (91)
Right_Caudate (50): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (601 voxels, overlap=1.001)
Right_Caudate (50): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (601 voxels, peak = 84), gca=83.8
gca peak = 0.15917 (88)
mri peak = 0.09326 (83)
Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.01 x + 0.0 (674 voxels, overlap=0.930)
Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.01 x + 0.0 (674 voxels, peak = 89), gca=89.3
gca peak = 0.10357 (73)
mri peak = 0.05446 (72)
Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (9415 voxels, overlap=0.987)
Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (9415 voxels, peak = 73), gca=73.0
gca peak = 0.12744 (69)
mri peak = 0.05719 (67)
Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (10631 voxels, overlap=0.991)
Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (10631 voxels, peak = 68), gca=68.0
gca peak = 0.15239 (90)
mri peak = 0.06982 (87)
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 0.96 x + 0.0 (4367 voxels, overlap=0.990)
Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 0.96 x + 0.0 (4367 voxels, peak = 87), gca=86.8
gca peak = 0.18028 (84)
mri peak = 0.06288 (80)
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.01 x + 0.0 (4129 voxels, overlap=0.994)
Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.01 x + 0.0 (4129 voxels, peak = 85), gca=85.3
gca peak = 0.23768 (73)
mri peak = 0.08949 (74)
Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (257 voxels, overlap=0.994)
Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (257 voxels, peak = 73), gca=73.0
gca peak = 0.31376 (71)
mri peak = 0.06418 (65)
Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.03 x + 0.0 (385 voxels, overlap=1.003)
Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.03 x + 0.0 (385 voxels, peak = 73), gca=73.5
gca peak = 0.11163 (97)
mri peak = 0.05182 (95)
Left_Thalamus (10): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (2821 voxels, overlap=0.989)
Left_Thalamus (10): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (2821 voxels, peak = 97), gca=97.5
gca peak = 0.09606 (86)
mri peak = 0.06507 (88)
Right_Thalamus (49): linear fit = 1.01 x + 0.0 (2417 voxels, overlap=0.994)
Right_Thalamus (49): linear fit = 1.01 x + 0.0 (2417 voxels, peak = 87), gca=87.3
gca peak = 0.08405 (86)
mri peak = 0.09201 (93)
Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (406 voxels, overlap=0.755)
Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (406 voxels, peak = 88), gca=88.2
gca peak = 0.07965 (84)
mri peak = 0.06667 (89)
Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (801 voxels, overlap=0.910)
Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (801 voxels, peak = 84), gca=83.6
gca peak = 0.07707 (85)
mri peak = 0.07810 (83)
Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (5277 voxels, overlap=0.771)
Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (5277 voxels, peak = 87), gca=87.1
gca peak = 0.11311 (94)
mri peak = 0.08155 (95)
Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (567 voxels, overlap=0.837)
Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (567 voxels, peak = 94), gca=94.0
gca peak = 0.14756 (99)
mri peak = 0.06326 (94)
Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (460 voxels, overlap=0.946)
Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (460 voxels, peak = 99), gca=99.5
gca peak = 0.17159 (38)
mri peak = 0.11322 (38)
gca peak = 0.15149 (22)
mri peak = 0.07080 (23)
Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.27 x + 0.0 (99 voxels, overlap=0.773)
Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.27 x + 0.0 (99 voxels, peak = 28), gca=28.0
gca peak Unknown = 0.94777 ( 0)
gca peak Left_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.15275 (37)
gca peak Third_Ventricle = 0.17159 (38)
gca peak CSF = 0.13119 (54)
gca peak Left_Accumbens_area = 0.46411 (71)
gca peak Left_undetermined = 0.98480 (34)
gca peak Left_vessel = 0.63642 (53)
gca peak Left_choroid_plexus = 0.11039 (35)
gca peak Right_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.26261 (28)
gca peak Right_Accumbens_area = 0.30641 (84)
gca peak Right_vessel = 0.77268 (52)
gca peak Right_choroid_plexus = 0.13879 (38)
gca peak Fifth_Ventricle = 0.59466 (47)
gca peak WM_hypointensities = 0.10602 (77)
gca peak non_WM_hypointensities = 0.14199 (41)
gca peak Optic_Chiasm = 0.51650 (76)
not using caudate to estimate GM means
estimating mean gm scale to be 0.99 x + 0.0
estimating mean wm scale to be 1.00 x + 0.0
estimating mean csf scale to be 1.28 x + 0.0
Right_Pallidum too bright - rescaling by 0.984 (from 1.025) to 101.8 (was 103.5)
saving intensity scales to aseg.auto_noCCseg.label_intensities.txt
saving sequentially combined intensity scales to aseg.auto_noCCseg.label_intensities.txt
158610 voxels changed in iteration 0 of unlikely voxel relabeling
219 voxels changed in iteration 1 of unlikely voxel relabeling
2 voxels changed in iteration 2 of unlikely voxel relabeling
0 voxels changed in iteration 3 of unlikely voxel relabeling
176344 gm and wm labels changed (%32 to gray, %68 to white out of all changed labels)
776 hippocampal voxels changed.
1 amygdala voxels changed.
Reclassifying using Gibbs Priors
pass 1: 151868 changed. image ll: -2.214, PF=0.500
pass 2: 40042 changed. image ll: -2.210, PF=0.500
pass 3: 11067 changed.
pass 4: 3806 changed.
142590 voxels changed in iteration 0 of unlikely voxel relabeling
1013 voxels changed in iteration 1 of unlikely voxel relabeling
53 voxels changed in iteration 2 of unlikely voxel relabeling
1 voxels changed in iteration 3 of unlikely voxel relabeling
0 voxels changed in iteration 4 of unlikely voxel relabeling
9627 voxels changed in iteration 0 of unlikely voxel relabeling
206 voxels changed in iteration 1 of unlikely voxel relabeling
2 voxels changed in iteration 2 of unlikely voxel relabeling
0 voxels changed in iteration 3 of unlikely voxel relabeling
7026 voxels changed in iteration 0 of unlikely voxel relabeling
111 voxels changed in iteration 1 of unlikely voxel relabeling
5 voxels changed in iteration 2 of unlikely voxel relabeling
6 voxels changed in iteration 3 of unlikely voxel relabeling
0 voxels changed in iteration 4 of unlikely voxel relabeling
5892 voxels changed in iteration 0 of unlikely voxel relabeling
67 voxels changed in iteration 1 of unlikely voxel relabeling
0 voxels changed in iteration 2 of unlikely voxel relabeling
 !!!!!!!!! ventricle segment 1 with volume 13222 above threshold 100 - not erasing !!!!!!!!!!
 !!!!!!!!! ventricle segment 0 with volume 158 above threshold 100 - not erasing !!!!!!!!!!
 !!!!!!!!! ventricle segment 1 with volume 8734 above threshold 100 - not erasing !!!!!!!!!!
 !!!!!!!!! ventricle segment 5 with volume 360 above threshold 100 - not erasing !!!!!!!!!!
writing labeled volume to aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz
mri_ca_label utimesec    3337.188108
mri_ca_label stimesec    0.883989
mri_ca_label ru_maxrss   2118284
mri_ca_label ru_ixrss    0
mri_ca_label ru_idrss    0
mri_ca_label ru_isrss    0
mri_ca_label ru_minflt   1079762
mri_ca_label ru_majflt   7
mri_ca_label ru_nswap    0
mri_ca_label ru_inblock  2152
mri_ca_label ru_oublock  784
mri_ca_label ru_msgsnd   0
mri_ca_label ru_msgrcv   0
mri_ca_label ru_nsignals 0
mri_ca_label ru_nvcsw    261
mri_ca_label ru_nivcsw   9830
auto-labeling took 54 minutes and 37 seconds.
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:18:35:59 mri_ca_label N 10 e 3276.90 S 0.93 U 3337.18 P 101% M 2118284 F 7 R 1079764 W 0 c 9831 w 262 I 2152 O 784 L 3.35 3.14 2.96
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:30:36 mri_ca_label N 10 1.00 1.00 1.03
#--------------------------------------
#@# CC Seg Tue Nov  9 19:30:36 EST 2021

 mri_cc -aseg aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz -o aseg.auto.mgz -lta /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/transforms/cc_up.lta UC07 

will read input aseg from aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz
writing aseg with cc labels to aseg.auto.mgz
will write lta as /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/transforms/cc_up.lta
reading aseg from /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz
reading norm from /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/norm.mgz
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
34077 voxels in left wm, 70299 in right wm, xrange [126, 135]
searching rotation angles z=[-9  5], y=[-8  6]
searching scale 1 Z rot -8.9  searching scale 1 Z rot -8.7  searching scale 1 Z rot -8.4  searching scale 1 Z rot -8.2  searching scale 1 Z rot -7.9  searching scale 1 Z rot -7.7  searching scale 1 Z rot -7.4  searching scale 1 Z rot -7.2  searching scale 1 Z rot -6.9  searching scale 1 Z rot -6.7  searching scale 1 Z rot -6.4  searching scale 1 Z rot -6.2  searching scale 1 Z rot -5.9  searching scale 1 Z rot -5.7  searching scale 1 Z rot -5.4  searching scale 1 Z rot -5.2  searching scale 1 Z rot -4.9  searching scale 1 Z rot -4.7  searching scale 1 Z rot -4.4  searching scale 1 Z rot -4.2  searching scale 1 Z rot -3.9  searching scale 1 Z rot -3.7  searching scale 1 Z rot -3.4  searching scale 1 Z rot -3.2  searching scale 1 Z rot -2.9  searching scale 1 Z rot -2.7  searching scale 1 Z rot -2.4  searching scale 1 Z rot -2.2  searching scale 1 Z rot -1.9  searching scale 1 Z rot -1.7  searching scale 1 Z rot -1.4  searching scale 1 Z rot -1.2  searching scale 1 Z rot -0.9  searching scale 1 Z rot -0.7  searching scale 1 Z rot -0.4  searching scale 1 Z rot -0.2  searching scale 1 Z rot 0.1  searching scale 1 Z rot 0.3  searching scale 1 Z rot 0.6  searching scale 1 Z rot 0.8  searching scale 1 Z rot 1.1  searching scale 1 Z rot 1.3  searching scale 1 Z rot 1.6  searching scale 1 Z rot 1.8  searching scale 1 Z rot 2.1  searching scale 1 Z rot 2.3  searching scale 1 Z rot 2.6  searching scale 1 Z rot 2.8  searching scale 1 Z rot 3.1  searching scale 1 Z rot 3.3  searching scale 1 Z rot 3.6  searching scale 1 Z rot 3.8  searching scale 1 Z rot 4.1  searching scale 1 Z rot 4.3  searching scale 1 Z rot 4.6  searching scale 1 Z rot 4.8  global minimum found at slice 131.6, rotations (-1.18, -1.93)
final transformation (x=131.6, yr=-1.183, zr=-1.930):
 0.99922   0.03368  -0.02063  -4.94809;
-0.03367   0.99943   0.00070   20.41638;
 0.02064   0.00000   0.99979   14.30766;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
updating x range to be [125, 131] in xformed coordinates
best xformed slice 127
min_x_fornix = 128
min_x_fornix = 131
min_x_fornix = 136
min_x_fornix = 133
min_x_fornix = 132
cc center is found at 127 112 111
eigenvectors:
 0.00096  -0.00161   1.00000;
 0.01389  -0.99990  -0.00162;
 0.99990   0.01389  -0.00093;
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
writing aseg with callosum to /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri/aseg.auto.mgz...
corpus callosum segmentation took 0.8 minutes
#VMPC# mri_cc VmPeak  478132
mri_cc done
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:19:30:36 mri_cc N 7 e 48.90 S 0.22 U 49.60 P 101% M 343508 F 4 R 277871 W 0 c 143 w 26 I 960 O 768 L 1.00 1.00 1.03
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:31:25 mri_cc N 7 1.00 1.00 1.03
#--------------------------------------
#@# Merge ASeg Tue Nov  9 19:31:25 EST 2021

 cp aseg.auto.mgz aseg.presurf.mgz 

#--------------------------------------------
#@# Intensity Normalization2 Tue Nov  9 19:31:25 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri

 mri_normalize -seed 1234 -mprage -aseg aseg.presurf.mgz -mask brainmask.mgz norm.mgz brain.mgz 

setting seed for random number genererator to 1234
assuming input volume is MGH (Van der Kouwe) MP-RAGE
using segmentation for initial intensity normalization
using MR volume brainmask.mgz to mask input volume...
reading mri_src from norm.mgz...
Reading aseg aseg.presurf.mgz
normalizing image...
NOT doing gentle normalization with control points/label
processing with aseg
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
removing outliers in the aseg WM...
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
4430 control points removed
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
Building bias image
building Voronoi diagram...
performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 0...
Smoothing with sigma 8
Applying bias correction
building Voronoi diagram...
performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 8...

Iterating 2 times
---------------------------------
3d normalization pass 1 of 2
white matter peak found at 110
white matter peak found at 90
gm peak at 68 (68), valley at 20 (20)
csf peak at 35, setting threshold to 57
building Voronoi diagram...
performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 8...
---------------------------------
3d normalization pass 2 of 2
white matter peak found at 110
white matter peak found at 89
gm peak at 67 (67), valley at 19 (19)
csf peak at 34, setting threshold to 56
building Voronoi diagram...
performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 8...
Done iterating ---------------------------------
writing output to brain.mgz
3D bias adjustment took 1 minutes and 56 seconds.
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:19:31:25 mri_normalize N 9 e 117.41 S 0.70 U 131.23 P 112% M 1202772 F 0 R 632698 W 0 c 330 w 25 I 0 O 3184 L 1.00 1.00 1.03
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:33:22 mri_normalize N 9 1.00 1.00 1.02
#--------------------------------------------
#@# Mask BFS Tue Nov  9 19:33:22 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri

 mri_mask -T 5 brain.mgz brainmask.mgz brain.finalsurfs.mgz 

threshold mask volume at 5
DoAbs = 0
Found 1795247 voxels in mask (pct= 10.70)
Writing masked volume to brain.finalsurfs.mgz...done.
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:19:33:22 mri_mask N 5 e 0.76 S 0.00 U 1.30 P 170% M 74176 F 4 R 17278 W 0 c 1 w 11 I 984 O 3128 L 1.00 1.00 1.02
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:33:23 mri_mask N 5 1.00 1.00 1.02
#--------------------------------------------
#@# WM Segmentation Tue Nov  9 19:33:23 EST 2021

 AntsDenoiseImageFs -i brain.mgz -o antsdn.brain.mgz 

@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:19:33:23 AntsDenoiseImageFs N 4 e 56.27 S 0.09 U 56.45 P 100% M 350712 F 20 R 86510 W 0 c 248 w 25 I 4240 O 3136 L 1.00 1.00 1.02
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:34:19 AntsDenoiseImageFs N 4 1.00 1.00 1.01

 mri_segment -wsizemm 13 -mprage antsdn.brain.mgz wm.seg.mgz 

wsizemm = 13, voxres = 1, wsize = 13
Widening wm low from 89 to 79
assuming input volume is MGH (Van der Kouwe) MP-RAGE
wm mean:  110
wsize:    13
wm low:   79
wm hi:    125
gray low: 30
gray hi:  99
Doing initial trinary intensity segmentation 
Using local statistics to label ambiguous voxels
Autodetecting stats
Computing class statistics for intensity windows...
CCS WM (100.0): 99.9 +- 5.9 [79.0 --> 125.0]
CCS GM (79.0) : 77.0 +- 11.2 [30.0 --> 95.0]
 white_mean 99.9314
 white_sigma 5.92256
 gray_mean 76.9959
 gray_sigma 11.2087
setting bottom of white matter range wm_low to 88.2
setting top of gray matter range gray_hi to 99.4
 wm_low 88.2046
 wm_hi  125
 gray_low 30
 gray_hi  99.4132
Redoing initial intensity segmentation...
Recomputing local statistics to label ambiguous voxels...
 wm_low 88.2046
 wm_hi  125
 gray_low 30
 gray_hi  99.4132
using local geometry to label remaining ambiguous voxels...
polvwsize = 5, polvlen = 3, gray_hi = 99.4132, wm_low = 88.2046
MRIcpolvMedianCurveSegment(): wsize=5, len=3, gmhi=99.4132, wmlow=88.2046
    260802 voxels processed (1.55%)
    121407 voxels white (0.72%)
    139395 voxels non-white (0.83%)

Reclassifying voxels using Gaussian border classifier niter=1
MRIreclassify(): wm_low=83.2046, gray_hi=99.4132, wsize=13
    504267 voxels tested (3.01%)
     98725 voxels changed (0.59%)
     88947 multi-scale searches  (0.53%)
Recovering bright white
MRIrecoverBrightWhite()
 wm_low 88.2046
 wm_hi 125
 slack 5.92256
 pct_thresh 0.33
 intensity_thresh 130.923
 nvox_thresh 8.58
       83 voxels tested (0.00%)
       45 voxels changed (0.00%)

removing voxels with positive offset direction...
MRIremoveWrongDirection() wsize=3, lowthr=83.2046, hithr=99.4132
  smoothing input volume with sigma = 0.250
   241497 voxels tested (1.44%)
    41608 voxels changed (0.25%)
thicken = 1
removing 1-dimensional structures...
MRIremove1dStructures(): max_iter=10000, thresh=2, WM_MIN_VAL=5
 11055 sparsely connected voxels removed in 1 iterations
thickening thin strands....
thickness 4
nsegments 20
wm_hi 125
10249 diagonally connected voxels added...
MRIthickenThinWMStrands(): thickness=4, nsegments=20
  20 segments, 4686 filled
MRIfindBrightNonWM(): 384 bright non-wm voxels segmented.
MRIfilterMorphology() WM_MIN_VAL=5, DIAGONAL_FILL=230
white matter segmentation took 1.8 minutes
writing output to wm.seg.mgz...
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:19:34:19 mri_segment N 5 e 109.90 S 0.23 U 110.49 P 100% M 149540 F 3 R 299407 W 0 c 284 w 13 I 768 O 1032 L 1.00 1.00 1.01
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:36:09 mri_segment N 5 1.00 1.00 1.00

 mri_edit_wm_with_aseg -keep-in wm.seg.mgz brain.mgz aseg.presurf.mgz wm.asegedit.mgz 

preserving editing changes in input volume...
auto filling took 0.42 minutes
reading wm segmentation from wm.seg.mgz...
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
0 voxels added to wm to prevent paths from MTL structures to cortex
12697 additional wm voxels added
0 additional wm voxels added
SEG EDIT: 87743 voxels turned on, 17268 voxels turned off.
propagating editing to output volume from wm.seg.mgz
writing edited volume to wm.asegedit.mgz....
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:19:36:09 mri_edit_wm_with_aseg N 5 e 25.18 S 0.19 U 26.85 P 107% M 462164 F 4 R 317160 W 0 c 83 w 47 I 992 O 1000 L 1.00 1.00 1.00
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:36:35 mri_edit_wm_with_aseg N 5 1.00 1.00 1.00

 mri_pretess wm.asegedit.mgz wm norm.mgz wm.mgz 


Iteration Number : 1
pass   1 (xy+):  61 found -  61 modified     |    TOTAL:  61
pass   2 (xy+):   0 found -  61 modified     |    TOTAL:  61
pass   1 (xy-):  69 found -  69 modified     |    TOTAL: 130
pass   2 (xy-):   0 found -  69 modified     |    TOTAL: 130
pass   1 (yz+):  91 found -  91 modified     |    TOTAL: 221
pass   2 (yz+):   0 found -  91 modified     |    TOTAL: 221
pass   1 (yz-):  70 found -  70 modified     |    TOTAL: 291
pass   2 (yz-):   0 found -  70 modified     |    TOTAL: 291
pass   1 (xz+):  89 found -  89 modified     |    TOTAL: 380
pass   2 (xz+):   0 found -  89 modified     |    TOTAL: 380
pass   1 (xz-):  77 found -  77 modified     |    TOTAL: 457
pass   2 (xz-):   0 found -  77 modified     |    TOTAL: 457
Iteration Number : 1
pass   1 (+++):  62 found -  62 modified     |    TOTAL:  62
pass   2 (+++):   0 found -  62 modified     |    TOTAL:  62
pass   1 (+++):  69 found -  69 modified     |    TOTAL: 131
pass   2 (+++):   0 found -  69 modified     |    TOTAL: 131
pass   1 (+++):  75 found -  75 modified     |    TOTAL: 206
pass   2 (+++):   0 found -  75 modified     |    TOTAL: 206
pass   1 (+++):  95 found -  95 modified     |    TOTAL: 301
pass   2 (+++):   0 found -  95 modified     |    TOTAL: 301
Iteration Number : 1
pass   1 (++): 294 found - 294 modified     |    TOTAL: 294
pass   2 (++):   0 found - 294 modified     |    TOTAL: 294
pass   1 (+-): 310 found - 310 modified     |    TOTAL: 604
pass   2 (+-):   0 found - 310 modified     |    TOTAL: 604
pass   1 (--): 291 found - 291 modified     |    TOTAL: 895
pass   2 (--):   1 found - 292 modified     |    TOTAL: 896
pass   3 (--):   0 found - 292 modified     |    TOTAL: 896
pass   1 (-+): 285 found - 285 modified     |    TOTAL: 1181
pass   2 (-+):   0 found - 285 modified     |    TOTAL: 1181
Iteration Number : 2
pass   1 (xy+):  31 found -  31 modified     |    TOTAL:  31
pass   2 (xy+):   0 found -  31 modified     |    TOTAL:  31
pass   1 (xy-):  32 found -  32 modified     |    TOTAL:  63
pass   2 (xy-):   0 found -  32 modified     |    TOTAL:  63
pass   1 (yz+):  27 found -  27 modified     |    TOTAL:  90
pass   2 (yz+):   0 found -  27 modified     |    TOTAL:  90
pass   1 (yz-):  42 found -  42 modified     |    TOTAL: 132
pass   2 (yz-):   0 found -  42 modified     |    TOTAL: 132
pass   1 (xz+):  33 found -  33 modified     |    TOTAL: 165
pass   2 (xz+):   0 found -  33 modified     |    TOTAL: 165
pass   1 (xz-):  34 found -  34 modified     |    TOTAL: 199
pass   2 (xz-):   0 found -  34 modified     |    TOTAL: 199
Iteration Number : 2
pass   1 (+++):   3 found -   3 modified     |    TOTAL:   3
pass   2 (+++):   0 found -   3 modified     |    TOTAL:   3
pass   1 (+++):  11 found -  11 modified     |    TOTAL:  14
pass   2 (+++):   0 found -  11 modified     |    TOTAL:  14
pass   1 (+++):   4 found -   4 modified     |    TOTAL:  18
pass   2 (+++):   0 found -   4 modified     |    TOTAL:  18
pass   1 (+++):   2 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:  20
pass   2 (+++):   0 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:  20
Iteration Number : 2
pass   1 (++):  18 found -  18 modified     |    TOTAL:  18
pass   2 (++):   0 found -  18 modified     |    TOTAL:  18
pass   1 (+-):  12 found -  12 modified     |    TOTAL:  30
pass   2 (+-):   0 found -  12 modified     |    TOTAL:  30
pass   1 (--):  17 found -  17 modified     |    TOTAL:  47
pass   2 (--):   0 found -  17 modified     |    TOTAL:  47
pass   1 (-+):  12 found -  12 modified     |    TOTAL:  59
pass   2 (-+):   0 found -  12 modified     |    TOTAL:  59
Iteration Number : 3
pass   1 (xy+):   4 found -   4 modified     |    TOTAL:   4
pass   2 (xy+):   0 found -   4 modified     |    TOTAL:   4
pass   1 (xy-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   4
pass   1 (yz+):   6 found -   6 modified     |    TOTAL:  10
pass   2 (yz+):   0 found -   6 modified     |    TOTAL:  10
pass   1 (yz-):   6 found -   6 modified     |    TOTAL:  16
pass   2 (yz-):   0 found -   6 modified     |    TOTAL:  16
pass   1 (xz+):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:  17
pass   2 (xz+):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:  17
pass   1 (xz-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:  17
Iteration Number : 3
pass   1 (+++):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   2 (+++):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (+++):   2 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:   3
pass   2 (+++):   0 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:   3
Iteration Number : 3
pass   1 (++):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   2 (++):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (+-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (--):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   2
pass   2 (--):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   2
pass   1 (-+):   2 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:   4
pass   2 (-+):   0 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:   4
Iteration Number : 4
pass   1 (xy+):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   2 (xy+):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (xy-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (yz+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (yz-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (xz+):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   2
pass   2 (xz+):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   2
pass   1 (xz-):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   3
pass   2 (xz-):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   3
Iteration Number : 4
pass   1 (+++):   2 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:   2
pass   2 (+++):   0 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:   2
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   2
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   2
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   2
Iteration Number : 4
pass   1 (++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+-):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   2 (+-):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (--):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (-+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
Iteration Number : 5
pass   1 (xy+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (xy-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (yz+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (yz-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (xz+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (xz-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
Iteration Number : 5
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
Iteration Number : 5
pass   1 (++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (--):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (-+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0

Total Number of Modified Voxels = 2247 (out of 604338: 0.371812)
binarizing input wm segmentation...
Ambiguous edge configurations... 

mri_pretess done

@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:19:36:35 mri_pretess N 4 e 3.28 S 0.00 U 3.80 P 116% M 56740 F 16 R 12982 W 0 c 11 w 24 I 3568 O 1000 L 1.00 1.00 1.00
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:36:38 mri_pretess N 4 1.00 1.00 1.00
#--------------------------------------------
#@# Fill Tue Nov  9 19:36:38 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/mri

 mri_fill -a ../scripts/ponscc.cut.log -xform transforms/talairach.lta -segmentation aseg.presurf.mgz -ctab /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/SubCorticalMassLUT.txt wm.mgz filled.mgz 

logging cutting plane coordinates to ../scripts/ponscc.cut.log...
INFO: Using transforms/talairach.lta and its offset for Talairach volume ...
using segmentation aseg.presurf.mgz...
reading input volume...done.
searching for cutting planes...voxel to talairach voxel transform
 1.03341   0.08993   0.03566  -25.58376;
-0.10320   0.96366   0.12473  -8.61546;
-0.02584  -0.12726   0.92802   24.18417;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
voxel to talairach voxel transform
 1.03341   0.08993   0.03566  -25.58376;
-0.10320   0.96366   0.12473  -8.61546;
-0.02584  -0.12726   0.92802   24.18417;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
reading segmented volume aseg.presurf.mgz
removing CC from segmentation
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
MRIcopyHeader(): source has ctab
Looking for area (min, max) = (350, 1400)
area[0] = 1118 (min = 350, max = 1400), aspect = 0.39 (min = 0.10, max = 0.75)
no need to search
using seed (127, 121, 150), TAL = (1.0, 22.0, 7.0)
talairach voxel to voxel transform
 0.95781  -0.09260  -0.02436   24.29578;
 0.09739   1.01019  -0.13952   14.56907;
 0.04003   0.13595   1.05775  -23.38553;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
segmentation indicates cc at (127,  121,  150) --> (1.0, 22.0, 7.0)
done.
filling took 1.1 minutes
talairach cc position changed to (1.00, 22.00, 7.00)
Erasing brainstem...done.
seed_search_size = 9, min_neighbors = 5
search rh wm seed point around talairach space:(19.00, 22.00, 7.00) SRC: (113.84, 126.49, 156.09)
search lh wm seed point around talairach space (-17.00, 22.00, 7.00), SRC: (148.32, 130.00, 157.53)
compute mri_fill using aseg
Erasing Brain Stem and Cerebellum ...
Define left and right masks using aseg:
Building Voronoi diagram ...
Using the Voronoi diagram for separating WM into two hemispheres ...
Find the largest connected component for each hemisphere ...
Embedding colortable
mri_fill done, writing output to filled.mgz...
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:19:36:38 mri_fill N 10 e 67.71 S 0.65 U 67.70 P 100% M 1013712 F 4 R 527669 W 0 c 227 w 12 I 1280 O 312 L 1.00 1.00 1.00
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:37:46 mri_fill N 10 1.00 1.00 1.00
 cp filled.mgz filled.auto.mgz
#--------------------------------------------
#@# Tessellate lh Tue Nov  9 19:37:46 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/scripts

 mri_pretess ../mri/filled.mgz 255 ../mri/norm.mgz ../mri/filled-pretess255.mgz 


Iteration Number : 1
pass   1 (xy+):   8 found -   8 modified     |    TOTAL:   8
pass   2 (xy+):   0 found -   8 modified     |    TOTAL:   8
pass   1 (xy-):   4 found -   4 modified     |    TOTAL:  12
pass   2 (xy-):   0 found -   4 modified     |    TOTAL:  12
pass   1 (yz+):  14 found -  14 modified     |    TOTAL:  26
pass   2 (yz+):   0 found -  14 modified     |    TOTAL:  26
pass   1 (yz-):   7 found -   7 modified     |    TOTAL:  33
pass   2 (yz-):   0 found -   7 modified     |    TOTAL:  33
pass   1 (xz+):   3 found -   3 modified     |    TOTAL:  36
pass   2 (xz+):   0 found -   3 modified     |    TOTAL:  36
pass   1 (xz-):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:  37
pass   2 (xz-):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:  37
Iteration Number : 1
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
Iteration Number : 1
pass   1 (++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+-):   3 found -   3 modified     |    TOTAL:   3
pass   2 (+-):   0 found -   3 modified     |    TOTAL:   3
pass   1 (--):   5 found -   5 modified     |    TOTAL:   8
pass   2 (--):   0 found -   5 modified     |    TOTAL:   8
pass   1 (-+):   5 found -   5 modified     |    TOTAL:  13
pass   2 (-+):   0 found -   5 modified     |    TOTAL:  13
Iteration Number : 2
pass   1 (xy+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (xy-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (yz+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (yz-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (xz+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (xz-):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   2 (xz-):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
Iteration Number : 2
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
Iteration Number : 2
pass   1 (++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (--):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (-+):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   2 (-+):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
Iteration Number : 3
pass   1 (xy+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (xy-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (yz+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (yz-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (xz+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (xz-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
Iteration Number : 3
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
Iteration Number : 3
pass   1 (++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (--):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (-+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0

Total Number of Modified Voxels = 52 (out of 311742: 0.016680)
Ambiguous edge configurations... 

mri_pretess done

@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:19:37:46 mri_pretess N 4 e 1.46 S 0.00 U 1.99 P 136% M 40464 F 0 R 8856 W 0 c 3 w 7 I 0 O 304 L 1.00 1.00 1.00
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:37:47 mri_pretess N 4 1.00 1.00 1.00

 mri_tessellate ../mri/filled-pretess255.mgz 255 ../surf/lh.orig.nofix 

dev
  dev
slice 30: 214 vertices, 248 faces
slice 40: 4588 vertices, 4769 faces
slice 50: 13213 vertices, 13573 faces
slice 60: 23674 vertices, 24111 faces
slice 70: 36865 vertices, 37302 faces
slice 80: 50269 vertices, 50750 faces
slice 90: 63217 vertices, 63681 faces
slice 100: 76904 vertices, 77450 faces
slice 110: 90761 vertices, 91381 faces
slice 120: 103774 vertices, 104354 faces
slice 130: 114746 vertices, 115364 faces
slice 140: 124281 vertices, 124898 faces
slice 150: 132466 vertices, 133053 faces
slice 160: 141055 vertices, 141700 faces
slice 170: 148560 vertices, 149155 faces
slice 180: 154781 vertices, 155352 faces
slice 190: 160086 vertices, 160622 faces
slice 200: 163037 vertices, 163499 faces
slice 210: 163322 vertices, 163720 faces
slice 220: 163322 vertices, 163720 faces
slice 230: 163322 vertices, 163720 faces
slice 240: 163322 vertices, 163720 faces
slice 250: 163322 vertices, 163720 faces
using the conformed surface RAS to save vertex points...
writing ../surf/lh.orig.nofix
using vox2ras matrix:
-1.00000   0.00000   0.00000   128.00000;
 0.00000   0.00000   1.00000  -128.00000;
 0.00000  -1.00000   0.00000   128.00000;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:19:37:47 mri_tessellate N 3 e 1.09 S 0.00 U 1.35 P 124% M 40052 F 3 R 9010 W 0 c 3 w 8 I 1184 O 7672 L 1.00 1.00 1.00
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:37:48 mri_tessellate N 3 1.00 1.00 1.00

 rm -f ../mri/filled-pretess255.mgz 


 mris_extract_main_component ../surf/lh.orig.nofix ../surf/lh.orig.nofix 


counting number of connected components...
   163290 voxel in cpt #1: X=-402 [v=163290,e=491076,f=327384] located at (-31.274818, -22.144020, 5.279490)
   20 voxel in cpt #2: X=2 [v=20,e=54,f=36] located at (-5.500000, 4.000000, 16.000000)
   12 voxel in cpt #3: X=2 [v=12,e=30,f=20] located at (-4.500000, 19.000000, 9.000000)
For the whole surface: X=-398 [v=163322,e=491160,f=327440]
3 components have been found
keeping component #1 with 163290 vertices
done

@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:19:37:48 mris_extract_main_component N 2 e 0.79 S 0.08 U 1.03 P 140% M 324336 F 14 R 86159 W 0 c 3 w 26 I 3264 O 11504 L 1.00 1.00 1.00
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:37:49 mris_extract_main_component N 2 1.00 1.00 1.00
#--------------------------------------------
#@# Tessellate rh Tue Nov  9 19:37:49 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/scripts

 mri_pretess ../mri/filled.mgz 127 ../mri/norm.mgz ../mri/filled-pretess127.mgz 


Iteration Number : 1
pass   1 (xy+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (xy-):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   2 (xy-):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (yz+):  13 found -  13 modified     |    TOTAL:  14
pass   2 (yz+):   0 found -  13 modified     |    TOTAL:  14
pass   1 (yz-):  13 found -  13 modified     |    TOTAL:  27
pass   2 (yz-):   0 found -  13 modified     |    TOTAL:  27
pass   1 (xz+):   2 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:  29
pass   2 (xz+):   0 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:  29
pass   1 (xz-):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:  30
pass   2 (xz-):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:  30
Iteration Number : 1
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   2 (+++):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (+++):   2 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:   3
pass   2 (+++):   0 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:   3
Iteration Number : 1
pass   1 (++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+-):   2 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:   2
pass   2 (+-):   0 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:   2
pass   1 (--):   2 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:   4
pass   2 (--):   0 found -   2 modified     |    TOTAL:   4
pass   1 (-+):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   5
pass   2 (-+):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   5
Iteration Number : 2
pass   1 (xy+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (xy-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (yz+):   1 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   2 (yz+):   0 found -   1 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (yz-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (xz+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
pass   1 (xz-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   1
Iteration Number : 2
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
Iteration Number : 2
pass   1 (++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (--):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (-+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
Iteration Number : 3
pass   1 (xy+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (xy-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (yz+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (yz-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (xz+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (xz-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
Iteration Number : 3
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
Iteration Number : 3
pass   1 (++):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (+-):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (--):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0
pass   1 (-+):   0 found -   0 modified     |    TOTAL:   0

Total Number of Modified Voxels = 39 (out of 297074: 0.013128)
Ambiguous edge configurations... 

mri_pretess done

@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:19:37:49 mri_pretess N 4 e 1.45 S 0.00 U 1.99 P 137% M 40312 F 0 R 8850 W 0 c 8 w 7 I 0 O 304 L 1.00 1.00 1.00
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:37:50 mri_pretess N 4 1.00 1.00 1.00

 mri_tessellate ../mri/filled-pretess127.mgz 127 ../surf/rh.orig.nofix 

dev
  dev
slice 40: 1758 vertices, 1880 faces
slice 50: 9248 vertices, 9584 faces
slice 60: 19306 vertices, 19696 faces
slice 70: 31794 vertices, 32244 faces
slice 80: 43434 vertices, 43910 faces
slice 90: 55817 vertices, 56294 faces
slice 100: 69188 vertices, 69792 faces
slice 110: 82951 vertices, 83592 faces
slice 120: 97506 vertices, 98192 faces
slice 130: 111174 vertices, 111855 faces
slice 140: 122116 vertices, 122680 faces
slice 150: 131236 vertices, 131796 faces
slice 160: 140128 vertices, 140774 faces
slice 170: 149173 vertices, 149833 faces
slice 180: 156384 vertices, 156996 faces
slice 190: 163096 vertices, 163735 faces
slice 200: 167956 vertices, 168467 faces
slice 210: 168520 vertices, 168930 faces
slice 220: 168520 vertices, 168930 faces
slice 230: 168520 vertices, 168930 faces
slice 240: 168520 vertices, 168930 faces
slice 250: 168520 vertices, 168930 faces
using the conformed surface RAS to save vertex points...
writing ../surf/rh.orig.nofix
using vox2ras matrix:
-1.00000   0.00000   0.00000   128.00000;
 0.00000   0.00000   1.00000  -128.00000;
 0.00000  -1.00000   0.00000   128.00000;
 0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   1.00000;
@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:19:37:50 mri_tessellate N 3 e 1.08 S 0.01 U 1.33 P 124% M 40404 F 0 R 9118 W 0 c 5 w 4 I 0 O 7912 L 1.00 1.00 1.00
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:37:52 mri_tessellate N 3 1.00 1.00 1.00

 rm -f ../mri/filled-pretess127.mgz 


 mris_extract_main_component ../surf/rh.orig.nofix ../surf/rh.orig.nofix 


counting number of connected components...
   168520 voxel in cpt #1: X=-410 [v=168520,e=506790,f=337860] located at (23.482916, -16.115797, 8.208622)
For the whole surface: X=-410 [v=168520,e=506790,f=337860]
One single component has been found
nothing to do
done

@#@FSTIME  2021:11:09:19:37:52 mris_extract_main_component N 2 e 0.86 S 0.13 U 1.05 P 137% M 334292 F 0 R 88902 W 0 c 12 w 13 I 0 O 11872 L 1.00 1.00 1.00
@#@FSLOADPOST 2021:11:09:19:37:52 mris_extract_main_component N 2 1.00 1.00 1.00
#--------------------------------------------
#@# Smooth1 lh Tue Nov  9 19:37:52 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/scripts

 mris_smooth -nw -seed 1234 ../surf/lh.orig.nofix ../surf/lh.smoothwm.nofix 

#--------------------------------------------
#@# Smooth1 rh Tue Nov  9 19:37:52 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/scripts

 mris_smooth -nw -seed 1234 ../surf/rh.orig.nofix ../surf/rh.smoothwm.nofix 

Waiting for PID 6201 of (6201 6204) to complete...
Waiting for PID 6204 of (6201 6204) to complete...

 mris_smooth -nw -seed 1234 ../surf/lh.orig.nofix ../surf/lh.smoothwm.nofix

setting seed for random number generator to 1234
smoothing surface tessellation for 10 iterations...
smoothing complete - recomputing first and second fundamental forms...

 mris_smooth -nw -seed 1234 ../surf/rh.orig.nofix ../surf/rh.smoothwm.nofix

setting seed for random number generator to 1234
smoothing surface tessellation for 10 iterations...
smoothing complete - recomputing first and second fundamental forms...
PIDs (6201 6204) completed and logs appended.
#--------------------------------------------
#@# Inflation1 lh Tue Nov  9 19:37:55 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/scripts

 mris_inflate -no-save-sulc ../surf/lh.smoothwm.nofix ../surf/lh.inflated.nofix 

#--------------------------------------------
#@# Inflation1 rh Tue Nov  9 19:37:55 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/scripts

 mris_inflate -no-save-sulc ../surf/rh.smoothwm.nofix ../surf/rh.inflated.nofix 

Waiting for PID 6249 of (6249 6252) to complete...
Waiting for PID 6252 of (6249 6252) to complete...

 mris_inflate -no-save-sulc ../surf/lh.smoothwm.nofix ../surf/lh.inflated.nofix

Not saving sulc
Reading ../surf/lh.smoothwm.nofix
avg radius = 49.4 mm, total surface area = 83583 mm^2
step 000: RMS=0.179 (target=0.015)   step 005: RMS=0.142 (target=0.015)   step 010: RMS=0.119 (target=0.015)   step 015: RMS=0.108 (target=0.015)   step 020: RMS=0.100 (target=0.015)   step 025: RMS=0.092 (target=0.015)   step 030: RMS=0.088 (target=0.015)   step 035: RMS=0.085 (target=0.015)   step 040: RMS=0.083 (target=0.015)   step 045: RMS=0.081 (target=0.015)   step 050: RMS=0.080 (target=0.015)   step 055: RMS=0.080 (target=0.015)   step 060: RMS=0.081 (target=0.015)   writing inflated surface to ../surf/lh.inflated.nofix
inflation took 0.2 minutes

inflation complete.
Not saving sulc
mris_inflate utimesec    36.954067
mris_inflate stimesec    0.822806
mris_inflate ru_maxrss   259272
mris_inflate ru_ixrss    0
mris_inflate ru_idrss    0
mris_inflate ru_isrss    0
mris_inflate ru_minflt   694768
mris_inflate ru_majflt   17
mris_inflate ru_nswap    0
mris_inflate ru_inblock  2184
mris_inflate ru_oublock  11504
mris_inflate ru_msgsnd   0
mris_inflate ru_msgrcv   0
mris_inflate ru_nsignals 0
mris_inflate ru_nvcsw    3878
mris_inflate ru_nivcsw   123

 mris_inflate -no-save-sulc ../surf/rh.smoothwm.nofix ../surf/rh.inflated.nofix

Not saving sulc
Reading ../surf/rh.smoothwm.nofix
avg radius = 48.7 mm, total surface area = 85575 mm^2
step 000: RMS=0.182 (target=0.015)   step 005: RMS=0.145 (target=0.015)   step 010: RMS=0.121 (target=0.015)   step 015: RMS=0.111 (target=0.015)   step 020: RMS=0.103 (target=0.015)   step 025: RMS=0.097 (target=0.015)   step 030: RMS=0.093 (target=0.015)   step 035: RMS=0.088 (target=0.015)   step 040: RMS=0.086 (target=0.015)   step 045: RMS=0.085 (target=0.015)   step 050: RMS=0.084 (target=0.015)   step 055: RMS=0.083 (target=0.015)   step 060: RMS=0.083 (target=0.015)   writing inflated surface to ../surf/rh.inflated.nofix
inflation took 0.2 minutes

inflation complete.
Not saving sulc
mris_inflate utimesec    36.663418
mris_inflate stimesec    0.818397
mris_inflate ru_maxrss   267220
mris_inflate ru_ixrss    0
mris_inflate ru_idrss    0
mris_inflate ru_isrss    0
mris_inflate ru_minflt   706747
mris_inflate ru_majflt   13
mris_inflate ru_nswap    0
mris_inflate ru_inblock  1552
mris_inflate ru_oublock  11872
mris_inflate ru_msgsnd   0
mris_inflate ru_msgrcv   0
mris_inflate ru_nsignals 0
mris_inflate ru_nvcsw    4352
mris_inflate ru_nivcsw   131
PIDs (6249 6252) completed and logs appended.
#--------------------------------------------
#@# QSphere lh Tue Nov  9 19:38:09 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/scripts

 mris_sphere -q -p 6 -a 128 -seed 1234 ../surf/lh.inflated.nofix ../surf/lh.qsphere.nofix 

#--------------------------------------------
#@# QSphere rh Tue Nov  9 19:38:09 EST 2021
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/scripts

 mris_sphere -q -p 6 -a 128 -seed 1234 ../surf/rh.inflated.nofix ../surf/rh.qsphere.nofix 

Waiting for PID 6297 of (6297 6300) to complete...
Waiting for PID 6300 of (6297 6300) to complete...

 mris_sphere -q -p 6 -a 128 -seed 1234 ../surf/lh.inflated.nofix ../surf/lh.qsphere.nofix

doing quick spherical unfolding.
limitting unfolding to 6 passes
using n_averages = 128
setting seed for random number genererator to 1234
version: dev
available threads: 4
scaling brain by 0.285...
inflating...
projecting onto sphere...
surface projected - minimizing metric distortion...
vertex spacing 0.89 +- 0.60 (0.00-->11.11) (max @ vno 84980 --> 84981)
face area 0.02 +- 0.03 (-0.24-->0.64)
Entering MRISinflateToSphere()
inflating to sphere (rms error < 2.00)
000: dt: 0.0000, rms radial error=177.311, avgs=0
005/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=177.049, avgs=0
010/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=176.488, avgs=0
015/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=175.753, avgs=0
020/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=174.917, avgs=0
025/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=174.023, avgs=0
030/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=173.097, avgs=0
035/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=172.154, avgs=0
040/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=171.203, avgs=0
045/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=170.249, avgs=0
050/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=169.296, avgs=0
055/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=168.346, avgs=0
060/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=167.399, avgs=0
065/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=166.456, avgs=0
070/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=165.517, avgs=0
075/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=164.583, avgs=0
080/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=163.657, avgs=0
085/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=162.737, avgs=0
090/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=161.823, avgs=0
095/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=160.914, avgs=0
100/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=160.010, avgs=0
105/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=159.111, avgs=0
110/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=158.216, avgs=0
115/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=157.327, avgs=0
120/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=156.442, avgs=0
125/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=155.562, avgs=0
130/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=154.687, avgs=0
135/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=153.817, avgs=0
140/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=152.951, avgs=0
145/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=152.090, avgs=0
150/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=151.234, avgs=0
155/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=150.382, avgs=0
160/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=149.536, avgs=0
165/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=148.694, avgs=0
170/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=147.856, avgs=0
175/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=147.023, avgs=0
180/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=146.195, avgs=0
185/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=145.371, avgs=0
190/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=144.552, avgs=0
195/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=143.737, avgs=0
200/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=142.927, avgs=0
205/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=142.122, avgs=0
210/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=141.320, avgs=0
215/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=140.524, avgs=0
220/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=139.732, avgs=0
225/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=138.944, avgs=0
230/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=138.161, avgs=0
235/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=137.383, avgs=0
240/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=136.608, avgs=0
245/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=135.839, avgs=0
250/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=135.073, avgs=0
255/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=134.311, avgs=0
260/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=133.554, avgs=0
265/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=132.801, avgs=0
270/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=132.052, avgs=0
275/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=131.308, avgs=0
280/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=130.567, avgs=0
285/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=129.831, avgs=0
290/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=129.099, avgs=0
295/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=128.371, avgs=0
300/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=127.647, avgs=0

spherical inflation complete.
epoch 1 (K=10.0), pass 1, starting sse = 19814.56
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.00/13 = 0.00032
epoch 2 (K=40.0), pass 1, starting sse = 3597.88
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.00/13 = 0.00016
epoch 3 (K=160.0), pass 1, starting sse = 476.85
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.02/13 = 0.00188
epoch 4 (K=640.0), pass 1, starting sse = 65.98
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.08/18 = 0.00449
final distance error %100000.00
writing spherical brain to ../surf/lh.qsphere.nofix
spherical transformation took 0.0256 hours
FSRUNTIME@ mris_sphere  0.0256 hours 4 threads
#VMPC# mris_sphere VmPeak  838380
mris_sphere done

 mris_sphere -q -p 6 -a 128 -seed 1234 ../surf/rh.inflated.nofix ../surf/rh.qsphere.nofix

doing quick spherical unfolding.
limitting unfolding to 6 passes
using n_averages = 128
setting seed for random number genererator to 1234
version: dev
available threads: 4
scaling brain by 0.293...
inflating...
projecting onto sphere...
surface projected - minimizing metric distortion...
vertex spacing 0.92 +- 0.75 (0.00-->51.63) (max @ vno 95362 --> 96761)
face area 0.02 +- 0.05 (-4.91-->2.99)
Entering MRISinflateToSphere()
inflating to sphere (rms error < 2.00)
000: dt: 0.0000, rms radial error=177.039, avgs=0
005/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=176.778, avgs=0
010/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=176.220, avgs=0
015/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=175.485, avgs=0
020/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=174.649, avgs=0
025/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=173.756, avgs=0
030/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=172.832, avgs=0
035/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=171.892, avgs=0
040/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=170.945, avgs=0
045/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=169.996, avgs=0
050/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=169.048, avgs=0
055/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=168.104, avgs=0
060/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=167.164, avgs=0
065/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=166.230, avgs=0
070/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=165.303, avgs=0
075/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=164.381, avgs=0
080/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=163.464, avgs=0
085/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=162.553, avgs=0
090/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=161.647, avgs=0
095/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=160.746, avgs=0
100/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=159.851, avgs=0
105/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=158.961, avgs=0
110/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=158.077, avgs=0
115/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=157.197, avgs=0
120/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=156.323, avgs=0
125/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=155.453, avgs=0
130/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=154.588, avgs=0
135/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=153.727, avgs=0
140/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=152.872, avgs=0
145/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=152.021, avgs=0
150/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=151.174, avgs=0
155/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=150.332, avgs=0
160/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=149.495, avgs=0
165/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=148.662, avgs=0
170/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=147.835, avgs=0
175/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=147.011, avgs=0
180/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=146.193, avgs=0
185/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=145.379, avgs=0
190/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=144.570, avgs=0
195/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=143.765, avgs=0
200/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=142.965, avgs=0
205/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=142.169, avgs=0
210/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=141.378, avgs=0
215/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=140.590, avgs=0
220/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=139.807, avgs=0
225/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=139.029, avgs=0
230/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=138.254, avgs=0
235/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=137.484, avgs=0
240/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=136.718, avgs=0
245/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=135.956, avgs=0
250/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=135.199, avgs=0
255/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=134.446, avgs=0
260/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=133.697, avgs=0
265/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=132.952, avgs=0
270/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=132.211, avgs=0
275/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=131.475, avgs=0
280/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=130.742, avgs=0
285/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=130.014, avgs=0
290/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=129.289, avgs=0
295/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=128.569, avgs=0
300/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=127.852, avgs=0

spherical inflation complete.
epoch 1 (K=10.0), pass 1, starting sse = 20559.44
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.01/13 = 0.00044
epoch 2 (K=40.0), pass 1, starting sse = 3898.32
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.01/13 = 0.00061
epoch 3 (K=160.0), pass 1, starting sse = 586.19
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.05/13 = 0.00365
epoch 4 (K=640.0), pass 1, starting sse = 115.65
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
taking momentum steps...
pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.16/19 = 0.00841
final distance error %100000.00
writing spherical brain to ../surf/rh.qsphere.nofix
spherical transformation took 0.0269 hours
FSRUNTIME@ mris_sphere  0.0269 hours 4 threads
#VMPC# mris_sphere VmPeak  842604
mris_sphere done
PIDs (6297 6300) completed and logs appended.
#@# Fix Topology lh Tue Nov  9 19:39:46 EST 2021

 mris_fix_topology -mgz -sphere qsphere.nofix -inflated inflated.nofix -orig orig.nofix -out orig.premesh -ga -seed 1234 UC07 lh 

#@# Fix Topology rh Tue Nov  9 19:39:46 EST 2021

 mris_fix_topology -mgz -sphere qsphere.nofix -inflated inflated.nofix -orig orig.nofix -out orig.premesh -ga -seed 1234 UC07 rh 

Waiting for PID 6337 of (6337 6340) to complete...
Waiting for PID 6340 of (6337 6340) to complete...
/home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/freesurfer/bin/reconbatchjobs: line 77:  6340 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) exec $JOB >> $LOG 2>&1

 mris_fix_topology -mgz -sphere qsphere.nofix -inflated inflated.nofix -orig orig.nofix -out orig.premesh -ga -seed 1234 UC07 lh

reading spherical homeomorphism from 'qsphere.nofix'
reading inflated coordinates from 'inflated.nofix'
reading original coordinates from 'orig.nofix'
using genetic algorithm with optimized parameters
setting seed for random number genererator to 1234

*************************************************************
Topology Correction Parameters
retessellation mode:           genetic search
number of patches/generation : 10
number of generations :        10
surface mri loglikelihood coefficient :         1.0
volume mri loglikelihood coefficient :          10.0
normal dot loglikelihood coefficient :          1.0
quadratic curvature loglikelihood coefficient : 1.0
volume resolution :                             2
eliminate vertices during search :              1
initial patch selection :                       1
select all defect vertices :                    0
ordering dependant retessellation:              0
use precomputed edge table :                    0
smooth retessellated patch :                    2
match retessellated patch :                     1
verbose mode :                                  0

*************************************************************
INFO: assuming .mgz format
writing corrected surface to 'orig.premesh'
dev
  dev
before topology correction, eno=-402 (nv=163290, nf=327384, ne=491076, g=202)
using quasi-homeomorphic spherical map to tessellate cortical surface...

Correction of the Topology
Finding true center and radius of Spherical Surface...done
Surface centered at (0,0,0) with radius 100.0 in 10 iterations
marking ambiguous vertices...
32616 ambiguous faces found in tessellation
segmenting defects...
130 defects found, arbitrating ambiguous regions...
analyzing neighboring defects...
      -merging segment 58 into 47
      -merging segment 67 into 47
      -merging segment 80 into 47
      -merging segment 72 into 61
      -merging segment 68 into 63
      -merging segment 78 into 73
      -merging segment 93 into 94
      -merging segment 101 into 95
      -merging segment 117 into 95
      -merging segment 122 into 95
      -merging segment 125 into 95
119 defects to be corrected 
0 vertices coincident
reading input surface /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/surf/lh.qsphere.nofix...
reading brain volume from brain...
reading wm segmentation from wm...
Reading original properties of orig.nofix
Reading vertex positions of inflated.nofix
Computing Initial Surface Statistics
      -face       loglikelihood: -9.2292  (-4.6146)
      -vertex     loglikelihood: -6.5184  (-3.2592)
      -normal dot loglikelihood: -3.5383  (-3.5383)
      -quad curv  loglikelihood: -6.3127  (-3.1563)
      Total Loglikelihood : -25.5986
CORRECTING DEFECT 0 (vertices=158, convex hull=119, v0=948)
After retessellation of defect 0 (v0=948), euler #=-114 (144682,429162,284366) : difference with theory (-116) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 1 (vertices=7, convex hull=26, v0=1224)
After retessellation of defect 1 (v0=1224), euler #=-113 (144682,429169,284374) : difference with theory (-115) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 2 (vertices=37, convex hull=68, v0=3091)
After retessellation of defect 2 (v0=3091), euler #=-112 (144700,429249,284437) : difference with theory (-114) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 3 (vertices=311, convex hull=179, v0=3784)
After retessellation of defect 3 (v0=3784), euler #=-111 (144752,429487,284624) : difference with theory (-113) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 4 (vertices=11, convex hull=47, v0=12818)
After retessellation of defect 4 (v0=12818), euler #=-110 (144756,429512,284646) : difference with theory (-112) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 5 (vertices=30, convex hull=55, v0=14208)
After retessellation of defect 5 (v0=14208), euler #=-109 (144768,429575,284698) : difference with theory (-111) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 6 (vertices=24, convex hull=55, v0=14418)
After retessellation of defect 6 (v0=14418), euler #=-108 (144781,429634,284745) : difference with theory (-110) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 7 (vertices=57, convex hull=69, v0=17243)
After retessellation of defect 7 (v0=17243), euler #=-107 (144794,429698,284797) : difference with theory (-109) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 8 (vertices=108, convex hull=40, v0=17847)
After retessellation of defect 8 (v0=17847), euler #=-106 (144802,429733,284825) : difference with theory (-108) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 9 (vertices=200, convex hull=180, v0=20084)
After retessellation of defect 9 (v0=20084), euler #=-105 (144886,430069,285078) : difference with theory (-107) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 10 (vertices=28, convex hull=54, v0=20600)
After retessellation of defect 10 (v0=20600), euler #=-104 (144897,430120,285119) : difference with theory (-106) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 11 (vertices=5, convex hull=19, v0=24258)
After retessellation of defect 11 (v0=24258), euler #=-103 (144898,430128,285127) : difference with theory (-105) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 12 (vertices=44, convex hull=65, v0=24551)
After retessellation of defect 12 (v0=24551), euler #=-102 (144920,430218,285196) : difference with theory (-104) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 13 (vertices=43, convex hull=61, v0=24885)
After retessellation of defect 13 (v0=24885), euler #=-101 (144930,430269,285238) : difference with theory (-103) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 14 (vertices=35, convex hull=68, v0=28464)
After retessellation of defect 14 (v0=28464), euler #=-100 (144941,430330,285289) : difference with theory (-102) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 15 (vertices=25, convex hull=76, v0=29840)
After retessellation of defect 15 (v0=29840), euler #=-99 (144952,430392,285341) : difference with theory (-101) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 16 (vertices=5, convex hull=17, v0=33951)
After retessellation of defect 16 (v0=33951), euler #=-98 (144952,430397,285347) : difference with theory (-100) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 17 (vertices=22, convex hull=51, v0=34325)
After retessellation of defect 17 (v0=34325), euler #=-97 (144962,430448,285389) : difference with theory (-99) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 18 (vertices=5, convex hull=18, v0=34759)
After retessellation of defect 18 (v0=34759), euler #=-96 (144962,430453,285395) : difference with theory (-98) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 19 (vertices=32, convex hull=29, v0=35385)
After retessellation of defect 19 (v0=35385), euler #=-95 (144966,430475,285414) : difference with theory (-97) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 20 (vertices=7, convex hull=26, v0=36646)
After retessellation of defect 20 (v0=36646), euler #=-94 (144967,430486,285425) : difference with theory (-96) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 21 (vertices=89, convex hull=144, v0=38027)
After retessellation of defect 21 (v0=38027), euler #=-93 (145017,430699,285589) : difference with theory (-95) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 22 (vertices=6, convex hull=20, v0=40332)
After retessellation of defect 22 (v0=40332), euler #=-92 (145018,430707,285597) : difference with theory (-94) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 23 (vertices=47, convex hull=48, v0=44873)
After retessellation of defect 23 (v0=44873), euler #=-91 (145038,430787,285658) : difference with theory (-93) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 24 (vertices=55, convex hull=35, v0=45007)
After retessellation of defect 24 (v0=45007), euler #=-90 (145046,430821,285685) : difference with theory (-92) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 25 (vertices=37, convex hull=72, v0=46180)
After retessellation of defect 25 (v0=46180), euler #=-89 (145064,430907,285754) : difference with theory (-91) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 26 (vertices=407, convex hull=270, v0=50939)
After retessellation of defect 26 (v0=50939), euler #=-88 (145129,431235,286018) : difference with theory (-90) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 27 (vertices=23, convex hull=21, v0=51445)
After retessellation of defect 27 (v0=51445), euler #=-87 (145131,431247,286029) : difference with theory (-89) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 28 (vertices=24, convex hull=46, v0=53208)
After retessellation of defect 28 (v0=53208), euler #=-86 (145141,431293,286066) : difference with theory (-88) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 29 (vertices=9, convex hull=18, v0=54779)
After retessellation of defect 29 (v0=54779), euler #=-85 (145145,431309,286079) : difference with theory (-87) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 30 (vertices=326, convex hull=261, v0=54829)
After retessellation of defect 30 (v0=54829), euler #=-84 (145204,431633,286345) : difference with theory (-86) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 31 (vertices=87, convex hull=125, v0=56264)
After retessellation of defect 31 (v0=56264), euler #=-83 (145243,431802,286476) : difference with theory (-85) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 32 (vertices=28, convex hull=76, v0=56481)
After retessellation of defect 32 (v0=56481), euler #=-82 (145258,431875,286535) : difference with theory (-84) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 33 (vertices=36, convex hull=68, v0=57966)
After retessellation of defect 33 (v0=57966), euler #=-81 (145274,431949,286594) : difference with theory (-83) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 34 (vertices=252, convex hull=59, v0=61662)
After retessellation of defect 34 (v0=61662), euler #=-80 (145286,432009,286643) : difference with theory (-82) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 35 (vertices=12, convex hull=23, v0=61735)
After retessellation of defect 35 (v0=61735), euler #=-79 (145287,432018,286652) : difference with theory (-81) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 36 (vertices=134, convex hull=62, v0=62539)
After retessellation of defect 36 (v0=62539), euler #=-78 (145312,432116,286726) : difference with theory (-80) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 37 (vertices=63, convex hull=70, v0=64572)
After retessellation of defect 37 (v0=64572), euler #=-77 (145323,432182,286782) : difference with theory (-79) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 38 (vertices=7, convex hull=29, v0=67055)
After retessellation of defect 38 (v0=67055), euler #=-76 (145327,432202,286799) : difference with theory (-78) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 39 (vertices=15, convex hull=40, v0=68540)
After retessellation of defect 39 (v0=68540), euler #=-75 (145332,432230,286823) : difference with theory (-77) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 40 (vertices=57, convex hull=71, v0=71068)
After retessellation of defect 40 (v0=71068), euler #=-74 (145350,432316,286892) : difference with theory (-76) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 41 (vertices=42, convex hull=81, v0=71407)
After retessellation of defect 41 (v0=71407), euler #=-73 (145373,432416,286970) : difference with theory (-75) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 42 (vertices=69, convex hull=123, v0=72855)
After retessellation of defect 42 (v0=72855), euler #=-72 (145419,432610,287119) : difference with theory (-74) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 43 (vertices=38, convex hull=79, v0=73385)
After retessellation of defect 43 (v0=73385), euler #=-71 (145441,432707,287195) : difference with theory (-73) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 44 (vertices=127, convex hull=108, v0=73954)
After retessellation of defect 44 (v0=73954), euler #=-70 (145476,432856,287310) : difference with theory (-72) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 45 (vertices=29, convex hull=49, v0=74919)
After retessellation of defect 45 (v0=74919), euler #=-69 (145488,432909,287352) : difference with theory (-71) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 46 (vertices=238, convex hull=183, v0=74921)
After retessellation of defect 46 (v0=74921), euler #=-68 (145565,433235,287602) : difference with theory (-70) = -2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 47 (vertices=6231, convex hull=1339, v0=76502)
An extra large defect has been detected...
This often happens because cerebellum or dura has not been removed from wm.mgz.
This may cause recon-all to run very slowly or crash.
if so, see https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/TopologicalDefect_freeview
After retessellation of defect 47 (v0=76502), euler #=-71 (146133,435701,289497) : difference with theory (-69) = 2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 48 (vertices=24, convex hull=32, v0=78372)
After retessellation of defect 48 (v0=78372), euler #=-70 (146136,435722,289516) : difference with theory (-68) = 2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 49 (vertices=35, convex hull=45, v0=79403)
After retessellation of defect 49 (v0=79403), euler #=-69 (146146,435769,289554) : difference with theory (-67) = 2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 50 (vertices=38, convex hull=60, v0=81024)
After retessellation of defect 50 (v0=81024), euler #=-68 (146169,435861,289624) : difference with theory (-66) = 2 
CORRECTING DEFECT 51 (vertices=304, convex hull=217, v0=81534)
After retessellation of defect 51 (v0=81534), euler #=-68 (146267,436260,289925) : difference with theory (-65) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 52 (vertices=21, convex hull=41, v0=81896)
After retessellation of defect 52 (v0=81896), euler #=-67 (146279,436310,289964) : difference with theory (-64) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 53 (vertices=27, convex hull=29, v0=82308)
After retessellation of defect 53 (v0=82308), euler #=-66 (146287,436342,289989) : difference with theory (-63) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 54 (vertices=19, convex hull=33, v0=83044)
After retessellation of defect 54 (v0=83044), euler #=-65 (146290,436358,290003) : difference with theory (-62) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 55 (vertices=18, convex hull=37, v0=83370)
After retessellation of defect 55 (v0=83370), euler #=-64 (146296,436390,290030) : difference with theory (-61) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 56 (vertices=7, convex hull=23, v0=83405)
After retessellation of defect 56 (v0=83405), euler #=-63 (146298,436404,290043) : difference with theory (-60) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 57 (vertices=71, convex hull=81, v0=84044)
After retessellation of defect 57 (v0=84044), euler #=-62 (146321,436506,290123) : difference with theory (-59) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 58 (vertices=7, convex hull=16, v0=86100)
After retessellation of defect 58 (v0=86100), euler #=-61 (146323,436516,290132) : difference with theory (-58) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 59 (vertices=458, convex hull=238, v0=86794)
After retessellation of defect 59 (v0=86794), euler #=-62 (146447,437024,290515) : difference with theory (-57) = 5 
CORRECTING DEFECT 60 (vertices=1341, convex hull=412, v0=87292)
After retessellation of defect 60 (v0=87292), euler #=-60 (146562,437577,290955) : difference with theory (-56) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 61 (vertices=75, convex hull=88, v0=88036)
After retessellation of defect 61 (v0=88036), euler #=-59 (146580,437669,291030) : difference with theory (-55) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 62 (vertices=78, convex hull=94, v0=91066)
After retessellation of defect 62 (v0=91066), euler #=-57 (146596,437762,291109) : difference with theory (-54) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 63 (vertices=6, convex hull=22, v0=93277)
After retessellation of defect 63 (v0=93277), euler #=-56 (146597,437772,291119) : difference with theory (-53) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 64 (vertices=15, convex hull=25, v0=94072)
After retessellation of defect 64 (v0=94072), euler #=-55 (146598,437781,291128) : difference with theory (-52) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 65 (vertices=121, convex hull=126, v0=94578)
After retessellation of defect 65 (v0=94578), euler #=-54 (146666,438043,291323) : difference with theory (-51) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 66 (vertices=417, convex hull=174, v0=97743)
After retessellation of defect 66 (v0=97743), euler #=-53 (146697,438217,291467) : difference with theory (-50) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 67 (vertices=30, convex hull=60, v0=98208)
After retessellation of defect 67 (v0=98208), euler #=-52 (146706,438268,291510) : difference with theory (-49) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 68 (vertices=14, convex hull=29, v0=99647)
After retessellation of defect 68 (v0=99647), euler #=-51 (146713,438299,291535) : difference with theory (-48) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 69 (vertices=319, convex hull=273, v0=103822)
After retessellation of defect 69 (v0=103822), euler #=-51 (146860,438914,292003) : difference with theory (-47) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 70 (vertices=58, convex hull=88, v0=104413)
After retessellation of defect 70 (v0=104413), euler #=-50 (146899,439067,292118) : difference with theory (-46) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 71 (vertices=7, convex hull=20, v0=105700)
After retessellation of defect 71 (v0=105700), euler #=-49 (146901,439077,292127) : difference with theory (-45) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 72 (vertices=32, convex hull=60, v0=106040)
After retessellation of defect 72 (v0=106040), euler #=-48 (146917,439146,292181) : difference with theory (-44) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 73 (vertices=115, convex hull=157, v0=106061)
After retessellation of defect 73 (v0=106061), euler #=-47 (146981,439418,292390) : difference with theory (-43) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 74 (vertices=16, convex hull=49, v0=106387)
After retessellation of defect 74 (v0=106387), euler #=-46 (146992,439470,292432) : difference with theory (-42) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 75 (vertices=11, convex hull=31, v0=108312)
After retessellation of defect 75 (v0=108312), euler #=-45 (146993,439483,292445) : difference with theory (-41) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 76 (vertices=25, convex hull=20, v0=108524)
After retessellation of defect 76 (v0=108524), euler #=-44 (146996,439497,292457) : difference with theory (-40) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 77 (vertices=25, convex hull=65, v0=110933)
After retessellation of defect 77 (v0=110933), euler #=-43 (147008,439556,292505) : difference with theory (-39) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 78 (vertices=17, convex hull=55, v0=111411)
After retessellation of defect 78 (v0=111411), euler #=-42 (147021,439616,292553) : difference with theory (-38) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 79 (vertices=28, convex hull=58, v0=112252)
After retessellation of defect 79 (v0=112252), euler #=-41 (147039,439696,292616) : difference with theory (-37) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 80 (vertices=65, convex hull=56, v0=116457)
After retessellation of defect 80 (v0=116457), euler #=-40 (147070,439818,292708) : difference with theory (-36) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 81 (vertices=43, convex hull=48, v0=119565)
After retessellation of defect 81 (v0=119565), euler #=-39 (147081,439870,292750) : difference with theory (-35) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 82 (vertices=12, convex hull=31, v0=120858)
After retessellation of defect 82 (v0=120858), euler #=-38 (147083,439885,292764) : difference with theory (-34) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 83 (vertices=21, convex hull=51, v0=122189)
After retessellation of defect 83 (v0=122189), euler #=-37 (147093,439932,292802) : difference with theory (-33) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 84 (vertices=23, convex hull=35, v0=123172)
After retessellation of defect 84 (v0=123172), euler #=-36 (147098,439957,292823) : difference with theory (-32) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 85 (vertices=24, convex hull=16, v0=124462)
After retessellation of defect 85 (v0=124462), euler #=-35 (147099,439964,292830) : difference with theory (-31) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 86 (vertices=18, convex hull=21, v0=126537)
After retessellation of defect 86 (v0=126537), euler #=-34 (147103,439981,292844) : difference with theory (-30) = 4 
CORRECTING DEFECT 87 (vertices=163, convex hull=74, v0=127719)
After retessellation of defect 87 (v0=127719), euler #=-32 (147132,440099,292935) : difference with theory (-29) = 3 
CORRECTING DEFECT 88 (vertices=2608, convex hull=944, v0=128265)
An extra large defect has been detected...
This often happens because cerebellum or dura has not been removed from wm.mgz.
This may cause recon-all to run very slowly or crash.
if so, see https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/TopologicalDefect_freeview
After retessellation of defect 88 (v0=128265), euler #=-27 (147576,441985,294382) : difference with theory (-28) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 89 (vertices=62, convex hull=97, v0=128984)
After retessellation of defect 89 (v0=128984), euler #=-26 (147612,442138,294500) : difference with theory (-27) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 90 (vertices=34, convex hull=43, v0=129031)
After retessellation of defect 90 (v0=129031), euler #=-25 (147619,442178,294534) : difference with theory (-26) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 91 (vertices=25, convex hull=26, v0=129123)
After retessellation of defect 91 (v0=129123), euler #=-24 (147624,442201,294553) : difference with theory (-25) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 92 (vertices=30, convex hull=69, v0=129153)
After retessellation of defect 92 (v0=129153), euler #=-23 (147640,442278,294615) : difference with theory (-24) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 93 (vertices=70, convex hull=63, v0=130172)
After retessellation of defect 93 (v0=130172), euler #=-22 (147668,442390,294700) : difference with theory (-23) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 94 (vertices=8, convex hull=38, v0=132096)
After retessellation of defect 94 (v0=132096), euler #=-21 (147670,442411,294720) : difference with theory (-22) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 95 (vertices=15, convex hull=17, v0=133013)
After retessellation of defect 95 (v0=133013), euler #=-20 (147672,442419,294727) : difference with theory (-21) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 96 (vertices=20, convex hull=29, v0=134495)
After retessellation of defect 96 (v0=134495), euler #=-19 (147677,442443,294747) : difference with theory (-20) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 97 (vertices=15, convex hull=37, v0=134570)
After retessellation of defect 97 (v0=134570), euler #=-18 (147686,442486,294782) : difference with theory (-19) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 98 (vertices=24, convex hull=62, v0=134931)
After retessellation of defect 98 (v0=134931), euler #=-17 (147695,442539,294827) : difference with theory (-18) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 99 (vertices=132, convex hull=139, v0=137618)
After retessellation of defect 99 (v0=137618), euler #=-16 (147748,442761,294997) : difference with theory (-17) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 100 (vertices=183, convex hull=91, v0=141863)
After retessellation of defect 100 (v0=141863), euler #=-15 (147786,442917,295116) : difference with theory (-16) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 101 (vertices=30, convex hull=61, v0=142813)
After retessellation of defect 101 (v0=142813), euler #=-14 (147807,443007,295186) : difference with theory (-15) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 102 (vertices=412, convex hull=91, v0=144756)
After retessellation of defect 102 (v0=144756), euler #=-13 (147822,443095,295260) : difference with theory (-14) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 103 (vertices=16, convex hull=23, v0=145164)
After retessellation of defect 103 (v0=145164), euler #=-12 (147824,443108,295272) : difference with theory (-13) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 104 (vertices=115, convex hull=58, v0=145572)
After retessellation of defect 104 (v0=145572), euler #=-11 (147836,443166,295319) : difference with theory (-12) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 105 (vertices=27, convex hull=85, v0=145965)
After retessellation of defect 105 (v0=145965), euler #=-10 (147845,443230,295375) : difference with theory (-11) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 106 (vertices=29, convex hull=58, v0=148993)
After retessellation of defect 106 (v0=148993), euler #=-9 (147860,443299,295430) : difference with theory (-10) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 107 (vertices=54, convex hull=70, v0=149160)
After retessellation of defect 107 (v0=149160), euler #=-8 (147872,443366,295486) : difference with theory (-9) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 108 (vertices=37, convex hull=30, v0=149800)
After retessellation of defect 108 (v0=149800), euler #=-7 (147877,443389,295505) : difference with theory (-8) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 109 (vertices=66, convex hull=38, v0=151036)
After retessellation of defect 109 (v0=151036), euler #=-6 (147882,443418,295530) : difference with theory (-7) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 110 (vertices=47, convex hull=61, v0=152360)
After retessellation of defect 110 (v0=152360), euler #=-5 (147899,443494,295590) : difference with theory (-6) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 111 (vertices=17, convex hull=35, v0=154207)
After retessellation of defect 111 (v0=154207), euler #=-4 (147902,443518,295612) : difference with theory (-5) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 112 (vertices=29, convex hull=33, v0=155746)
After retessellation of defect 112 (v0=155746), euler #=-3 (147908,443545,295634) : difference with theory (-4) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 113 (vertices=6, convex hull=28, v0=155993)
After retessellation of defect 113 (v0=155993), euler #=-2 (147909,443557,295646) : difference with theory (-3) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 114 (vertices=65, convex hull=42, v0=156450)
After retessellation of defect 114 (v0=156450), euler #=-1 (147913,443585,295671) : difference with theory (-2) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 115 (vertices=25, convex hull=69, v0=157683)
After retessellation of defect 115 (v0=157683), euler #=0 (147924,443646,295722) : difference with theory (-1) = -1 
CORRECTING DEFECT 116 (vertices=487, convex hull=140, v0=158176)
After retessellation of defect 116 (v0=158176), euler #=0 (148043,444071,296028) : difference with theory (0) = 0 
CORRECTING DEFECT 117 (vertices=63, convex hull=82, v0=158482)
After retessellation of defect 117 (v0=158482), euler #=1 (148066,444172,296107) : difference with theory (1) = 0 
CORRECTING DEFECT 118 (vertices=25, convex hull=52, v0=160509)
After retessellation of defect 118 (v0=160509), euler #=2 (148075,444219,296146) : difference with theory (2) = 0 
computing original vertex metric properties...
storing new metric properties...
computing tessellation statistics...
vertex spacing 0.89 +- 0.30 (0.04-->13.28) (max @ vno 82328 --> 92757)
face area -nan +- -nan (1000.00-->-1.00)
performing soap bubble on retessellated vertices for 0 iterations...
vertex spacing 0.89 +- 0.30 (0.04-->13.28) (max @ vno 82328 --> 92757)
face area -nan +- -nan (1000.00-->-1.00)
tessellation finished, orienting corrected surface...
431 mutations (38.0%), 702 crossovers (62.0%), 1683 vertices were eliminated
building final representation...
15215 vertices and 0 faces have been removed from triangulation
after topology correction, eno=2 (nv=148075, nf=296146, ne=444219, g=0)
writing corrected surface to /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/surf/lh.orig.premesh...

defective orientation at vertex 142565(142566) with faces 280307 and 295773

defective orientation at vertex 142565(142848) with faces 280307 and 295765

defective orientation at vertex 142566(142565) with faces 280307 and 295773

defective orientation at vertex 142566(142849) with faces 280308 and 295887

defective orientation at vertex 142848(142565) with faces 280307 and 295765

defective orientation at vertex 142848(142849) with faces 280308 and 295888

defective orientation at vertex 142849(142566) with faces 280308 and 295887

defective orientation at vertex 142849(142848) with faces 280308 and 295888

0.005 % of the vertices (8 vertices) exhibit an orientation change
removing intersecting faces
000: 1359 intersecting
001: 145 intersecting
002: 18 intersecting
003: 5 intersecting
terminating search with 0 intersecting
topology fixing took 9.0 minutes
FSRUNTIME@ mris_fix_topology lh  0.1502 hours 4 threads
#VMPC# mris_fix_topology VmPeak  1129128

 mris_fix_topology -mgz -sphere qsphere.nofix -inflated inflated.nofix -orig orig.nofix -out orig.premesh -ga -seed 1234 UC07 rh

reading spherical homeomorphism from 'qsphere.nofix'
reading inflated coordinates from 'inflated.nofix'
reading original coordinates from 'orig.nofix'
using genetic algorithm with optimized parameters
setting seed for random number genererator to 1234

*************************************************************
Topology Correction Parameters
retessellation mode:           genetic search
number of patches/generation : 10
number of generations :        10
surface mri loglikelihood coefficient :         1.0
volume mri loglikelihood coefficient :          10.0
normal dot loglikelihood coefficient :          1.0
quadratic curvature loglikelihood coefficient : 1.0
volume resolution :                             2
eliminate vertices during search :              1
initial patch selection :                       1
select all defect vertices :                    0
ordering dependant retessellation:              0
use precomputed edge table :                    0
smooth retessellated patch :                    2
match retessellated patch :                     1
verbose mode :                                  0

*************************************************************
INFO: assuming .mgz format
writing corrected surface to 'orig.premesh'
dev
  dev
before topology correction, eno=-410 (nv=168520, nf=337860, ne=506790, g=206)
using quasi-homeomorphic spherical map to tessellate cortical surface...

Correction of the Topology
Finding true center and radius of Spherical Surface...done
Surface centered at (0,0,0) with radius 100.0 in 11 iterations
marking ambiguous vertices...
41215 ambiguous faces found in tessellation
segmenting defects...
124 defects found, arbitrating ambiguous regions...
analyzing neighboring defects...
      -merging segment 23 into 21
      -merging segment 40 into 31
      -merging segment 42 into 31
      -merging segment 31 into 48
      -merging segment 51 into 50
      -merging segment 87 into 74
      -merging segment 90 into 89
      -merging segment 104 into 96
      -merging segment 108 into 98
      -merging segment 120 into 118
114 defects to be corrected 
0 vertices coincident
reading input surface /home/basuia/Documents/mmvt_root/subjects/UC07/surf/rh.qsphere.nofix...
reading brain volume from brain...
reading wm segmentation from wm...
Reading original properties of orig.nofix
Reading vertex positions of inflated.nofix
Computing Initial Surface Statistics
      -face       loglikelihood: -9.2517  (-4.6259)
      -vertex     loglikelihood: -6.5878  (-3.2939)
      -normal dot loglikelihood: -3.5173  (-3.5173)
      -quad curv  loglikelihood: -6.3616  (-3.1808)
      Total Loglikelihood : -25.7184
CORRECTING DEFECT 0 (vertices=151, convex hull=209, v0=94)
After retessellation of defect 0 (v0=94), euler #=-90 (144497,426068,281481) : difference with theory (-111) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 1 (vertices=35, convex hull=59, v0=108)
After retessellation of defect 1 (v0=108), euler #=-89 (144517,426153,281547) : difference with theory (-110) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 2 (vertices=10, convex hull=23, v0=1288)
After retessellation of defect 2 (v0=1288), euler #=-88 (144518,426163,281557) : difference with theory (-109) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 3 (vertices=67, convex hull=97, v0=1421)
After retessellation of defect 3 (v0=1421), euler #=-87 (144529,426242,281626) : difference with theory (-108) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 4 (vertices=27, convex hull=60, v0=1423)
After retessellation of defect 4 (v0=1423), euler #=-86 (144543,426308,281679) : difference with theory (-107) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 5 (vertices=21, convex hull=62, v0=1771)
After retessellation of defect 5 (v0=1771), euler #=-85 (144553,426361,281723) : difference with theory (-106) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 6 (vertices=40, convex hull=67, v0=1775)
After retessellation of defect 6 (v0=1775), euler #=-84 (144570,426440,281786) : difference with theory (-105) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 7 (vertices=267, convex hull=246, v0=2689)
After retessellation of defect 7 (v0=2689), euler #=-83 (144648,426785,282054) : difference with theory (-104) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 8 (vertices=30, convex hull=26, v0=3163)
After retessellation of defect 8 (v0=3163), euler #=-82 (144649,426797,282066) : difference with theory (-103) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 9 (vertices=17, convex hull=24, v0=4640)
After retessellation of defect 9 (v0=4640), euler #=-81 (144650,426808,282077) : difference with theory (-102) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 10 (vertices=13, convex hull=24, v0=4658)
After retessellation of defect 10 (v0=4658), euler #=-80 (144651,426817,282086) : difference with theory (-101) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 11 (vertices=5, convex hull=13, v0=7070)
After retessellation of defect 11 (v0=7070), euler #=-79 (144651,426823,282093) : difference with theory (-100) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 12 (vertices=18, convex hull=63, v0=7201)
After retessellation of defect 12 (v0=7201), euler #=-78 (144660,426875,282137) : difference with theory (-99) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 13 (vertices=293, convex hull=321, v0=7246)
After retessellation of defect 13 (v0=7246), euler #=-77 (144807,427482,282598) : difference with theory (-98) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 14 (vertices=60, convex hull=111, v0=9117)
After retessellation of defect 14 (v0=9117), euler #=-76 (144837,427619,282706) : difference with theory (-97) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 15 (vertices=29, convex hull=57, v0=12973)
After retessellation of defect 15 (v0=12973), euler #=-75 (144846,427665,282744) : difference with theory (-96) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 16 (vertices=37, convex hull=90, v0=14068)
After retessellation of defect 16 (v0=14068), euler #=-74 (144869,427771,282828) : difference with theory (-95) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 17 (vertices=460, convex hull=240, v0=15934)
After retessellation of defect 17 (v0=15934), euler #=-73 (144925,428045,283047) : difference with theory (-94) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 18 (vertices=13, convex hull=22, v0=19958)
After retessellation of defect 18 (v0=19958), euler #=-72 (144926,428052,283054) : difference with theory (-93) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 19 (vertices=53, convex hull=80, v0=20214)
After retessellation of defect 19 (v0=20214), euler #=-71 (144938,428125,283116) : difference with theory (-92) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 20 (vertices=21, convex hull=47, v0=20556)
After retessellation of defect 20 (v0=20556), euler #=-70 (144944,428158,283144) : difference with theory (-91) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 21 (vertices=205, convex hull=167, v0=22949)
After retessellation of defect 21 (v0=22949), euler #=-68 (145040,428521,283413) : difference with theory (-90) = -22 
CORRECTING DEFECT 22 (vertices=128, convex hull=170, v0=25791)
After retessellation of defect 22 (v0=25791), euler #=-67 (145128,428869,283674) : difference with theory (-89) = -22 
CORRECTING DEFECT 23 (vertices=56, convex hull=86, v0=28735)
After retessellation of defect 23 (v0=28735), euler #=-66 (145152,428985,283767) : difference with theory (-88) = -22 
CORRECTING DEFECT 24 (vertices=214, convex hull=186, v0=29209)
After retessellation of defect 24 (v0=29209), euler #=-66 (145217,429275,283992) : difference with theory (-87) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 25 (vertices=48, convex hull=55, v0=31316)
After retessellation of defect 25 (v0=31316), euler #=-65 (145223,429311,284023) : difference with theory (-86) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 26 (vertices=172, convex hull=160, v0=33860)
After retessellation of defect 26 (v0=33860), euler #=-64 (145290,429586,284232) : difference with theory (-85) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 27 (vertices=19, convex hull=54, v0=35083)
After retessellation of defect 27 (v0=35083), euler #=-63 (145297,429629,284269) : difference with theory (-84) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 28 (vertices=110, convex hull=168, v0=35294)
After retessellation of defect 28 (v0=35294), euler #=-62 (145369,429927,284496) : difference with theory (-83) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 29 (vertices=7, convex hull=30, v0=38552)
After retessellation of defect 29 (v0=38552), euler #=-61 (145371,429944,284512) : difference with theory (-82) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 30 (vertices=158, convex hull=100, v0=48137)
After retessellation of defect 30 (v0=48137), euler #=-60 (145421,430141,284660) : difference with theory (-81) = -21 
CORRECTING DEFECT 31 (vertices=228, convex hull=192, v0=50263)
After retessellation of defect 31 (v0=50263), euler #=-61 (145473,430402,284868) : difference with theory (-80) = -19 
CORRECTING DEFECT 32 (vertices=96, convex hull=152, v0=50844)
After retessellation of defect 32 (v0=50844), euler #=-60 (145535,430662,285067) : difference with theory (-79) = -19 
CORRECTING DEFECT 33 (vertices=401, convex hull=152, v0=53085)
After retessellation of defect 33 (v0=53085), euler #=-59 (145641,431051,285351) : difference with theory (-78) = -19 
CORRECTING DEFECT 34 (vertices=96, convex hull=35, v0=59094)
After retessellation of defect 34 (v0=59094), euler #=-58 (145650,431094,285386) : difference with theory (-77) = -19 
CORRECTING DEFECT 35 (vertices=11, convex hull=24, v0=59110)
After retessellation of defect 35 (v0=59110), euler #=-57 (145652,431106,285397) : difference with theory (-76) = -19 
CORRECTING DEFECT 36 (vertices=70, convex hull=34, v0=61327)
After retessellation of defect 36 (v0=61327), euler #=-56 (145661,431147,285430) : difference with theory (-75) = -19 
CORRECTING DEFECT 37 (vertices=97, convex hull=45, v0=61598)
After retessellation of defect 37 (v0=61598), euler #=-56 (145679,431222,285487) : difference with theory (-74) = -18 
CORRECTING DEFECT 38 (vertices=78, convex hull=43, v0=63381)
After retessellation of defect 38 (v0=63381), euler #=-55 (145688,431261,285518) : difference with theory (-73) = -18 
CORRECTING DEFECT 39 (vertices=53, convex hull=102, v0=70854)
After retessellation of defect 39 (v0=70854), euler #=-54 (145717,431388,285617) : difference with theory (-72) = -18 
CORRECTING DEFECT 40 (vertices=51, convex hull=84, v0=73682)
After retessellation of defect 40 (v0=73682), euler #=-54 (145747,431527,285726) : difference with theory (-71) = -17 
CORRECTING DEFECT 41 (vertices=28, convex hull=53, v0=75699)
After retessellation of defect 41 (v0=75699), euler #=-53 (145762,431589,285774) : difference with theory (-70) = -17 
CORRECTING DEFECT 42 (vertices=29, convex hull=69, v0=77504)
After retessellation of defect 42 (v0=77504), euler #=-52 (145775,431657,285830) : difference with theory (-69) = -17 
CORRECTING DEFECT 43 (vertices=66, convex hull=76, v0=79551)
After retessellation of defect 43 (v0=79551), euler #=-51 (145804,431777,285922) : difference with theory (-68) = -17 
CORRECTING DEFECT 44 (vertices=9236, convex hull=4698, v0=79649)
PIDs (6337 6340) completed and logs appended.
Linux Ishita-Ubuntu 5.4.0-89-generic #100~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 29 10:59:42 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

recon-all -s UC07 exited with ERRORS at Tue Nov  9 23:06:01 EST 2021

To report a problem, see http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
