External Email - Use Caution
It is hard to say from that image, but it does not look registered to me.
- your bbregister command is not valid as it is, please give the full
command
- please send the bbregister log file
- to look at the registration, use tkregisterfv. It will show the
surfaces over the fMRI
On 11/21/19 1:20 PM, An wrote:
>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Hi Prof. Greve,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I do it in the following steps:
> 1. ran recon-all on the anatomical volume: recon-all -i MRI.nii -s
> subjid -all
> 2. register the fMRI series with the anatomical volume by using
> bbregister: bbregister --mov fMRI.nii --s subjid --reg register.dat
> 3. assign values from volumes to each surface vertex through the
> command mri_vol2surf: mri_vol2surf --src MRI.nii --out putput.mgz
> --srcreg register.dat --hemi lh
>
> I also attached the registered image after step2. It looks like they
> are not perfectly aligned. Is there anyway to improve that and also
> the final result?
>
> Many thanks.
>
> Best,
> An
> image.png
>
> Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <DGREVE@mgh.harvard.edu
> <mailto:DGREVE@mgh.harvard.edu>> 于2019年11月21日周四 下午12:42写道:
>
> 35% sounds high to me. Did you actually check the registration
>
> You can always load the the fMRI as an overlay in freeview, try
> tksurferfv subject lh inflated -ov fmri-sampled-on-lh.mgz
> Also, please include command lines you used
>
> On 11/21/19 10:03 AM, An wrote:
> >
> > External Email - Use Caution
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I want to map the intensities of the fMRI 4D volumes onto its
> surface
> > in order to get the functional values on each vertex in each frame.
> >
> > I have done the following steps for achieving this:
> > 1. ran recon-all on its anatomical volume.
> > 2. register the fMRI series with the anatomical volume by using
> > bbregister.
> > 3. assign values from volumes to each surface vertex through the
> > command mri_vol2surf.
> >
> > I have got a result of mapping the 4D volumes intensities onto its
> > surfaces but there are 35.5% vertices assigned 0 value in every
> time
> > frame.
> >
> > I am wondering is the ratio reasonable and how could I improve the
> > result? I guess resolution would be one of reasons causing the
> high 0
> > value ratio, my fMRI data is 2mm^3 and anatomical data is 1mm^3.
> >
> > Many thanks for your help.
> >
> > Best,
> > An
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer