Allie

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Douglas N Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

It might, don't know

Allie Rosen wrote:

Hi Doug,

Yes, I think there actually may be a topologic defect in this area, although not directly where the cluster is (attached). Could this be the cause of the thickness result? If I go back and try to repair the defect, will that make the results more typical and, more importantly, correct?

Thanks again,
Allie

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Douglas N Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:

Hi Allie, yes, it means that each group is affected differently by
age. The controls are increasing their thickness with age in this
area (which seems strange, usually you expect general decreases
with age). You might check the quality of the surfaces in this area.
doug

Allie Rosen wrote:

Hi Doug,

Thanks for the response. I've actually already run an
interaction contrast and the same area is still significant
(attached). I'm not sure how to interpret this either,
unfortunately. Does it say that both groups are affected
significantly differently by age? Can you tell me what it
means? I'm having problems trying to do this myself.

Thanks very much,
Allie

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Douglas N Greve
<greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
<mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

<mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>> wrote:

Allie, to be more precise, you have selected control<patient
regressing out the effects of age. This second part is the key.
If you were to trace the regression lines back to age=0 (the
meaning of "regressing out age"), then control<patient by a
wide
margin. But you have a problem here in that the regression
lines
are crossed. This means that you have an interaction
between age
and patient (no interaction means that the lines would be
parallel). An interaction means that you cannot assess whether
there is a difference in the thickness because this difference
changes depending upon the age. One thing you can try is to
actually compute an interaction contrast (something like [0 0 1
-1]). If it is significant in this area, then there's not
much you
can do (though it may be interesting in itself). If it is not
significant, then you can switch to a DOSS model which
forces the
lines to be parallel and makes the distance between the
lines be
independent of age. Does this make sense?
doug

Allie Rosen wrote:

Hi All,

I'm having trouble reconciling the cluster colours with the
graph that can be made when you load the group
descriptor file
and click on a point. I've attached an example.
In this study, I'm comparing thickness in a patient and
control group, with age regressed out. The contrast
I've used
means that blue means control<patient. Therefore,
patients are
thicker than controls. But in the graph, patients don't
seem
to be thicker. I've seen the same results with red clusters
(i.e. they should mean that controls are thicker but
the graph
shows otherwhise). Please let me know how I can
interpret my
findings given the graph. Which group is actually thicker?

Thank you,
Allison

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>

https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
<mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

<mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Phone Number: 617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358>
<tel:617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358>> Fax: 617-726-7422
<tel:617-726-7422>
<tel:617-726-7422 <tel:617-726-7422>>

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
<http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting>
<http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting>
FileDrop:
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
<http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>
<http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>

The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
person to
whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
error and
the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners
Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
sent to
you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the
sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Phone Number: 617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358> Fax: 617-726-7422
<tel:617-726-7422>

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
<http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting>
FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
<http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html