Hi weiwei

if the aseg looks good you don't have to worry about how the subcortical
structures look in the brainmask - it's irrelevant. Not sure about the pial
surfaces - we find the surfaces in 6.0 more accurate than 5.3, but maybe
not for your specific sequence? It's hard to say

cheers
Bruce

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, ?
? wrote:

> dear FS community:
> now i have more than 200 subjects which already finished recon-all with 5.3,
> since 6.0 released, i wonder should i re-run them with 6.0 as lots of changes like
> different surf-map and registration. i ran a bit of them as test and i found the pial
> problems were more than 5.3, and it seems some subcortical structures were vanished
> in the brainmask.mgz, though the aseg.mgz looked good.
> i wanna ask is my problem serious or it is usual with 6.0, and which version you
> think is better for cortical volume and surface thickness reserch?
> best regards
>
> weiwei
> west china hospital
>
> _____________________________________________________________________________________
> weiqi77777@live.com
>
>_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.