I would use the versions where the group size approximately matched the individual size.  

Peace,

Matt.

From: <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Trisanna Sprung-Much <trisanna.sprung-much@mail.mcgill.ca>
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Date: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 7:36 PM
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: [Freesurfer] Brodmann areas - exvivo labels

Hi there

If I wanted to compare some spatial probability maps of some sulci of interest with the Juelich Data provided by FreeSurfer, would it make more sense to use the unthresholded Brodmann areas or the .thresh ones? Based on my understanding of how the .thresh was created (by creating a surface area of the average BA label that best resembled the average surface area of the label from each individual hemisphere) in order to avoid including vertices that had a probability of 10%, for instance, I think using .thresh would be fine. However, I thought I would verify. In input would be greatly appreciated.


Best
Trisanna
--
Ph.D. Candidate
McGill University
Integrated Program in Neuroscience
Psychology


_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.