Hi Anastasia or anyone,

Are there any other groups of labels which are, by default, produced in comparable less vs more restrictive ways?

For instance, is there a way to produce lh.aparc.thresh.annot with comparably constrained labels?

And does it make sense to do so?

Regards,

Don

<snip>

>

>

> On 14-09-08 12:39 PM, Anastasia Yendiki wrote:

> > Hi David - On the difference between .thresh and "not .thresh" labels:

> > The BA labels come from averaging histologically derived labels from

> > a set of post mortem brains. The non-thresholded version is just the

> > sum of the corresponding labels from the different brains in

> > fsaverage space. So vertices are included even if only one of the

> > brains had their BA in that vertex, which means that these labels

> > are going to be rather large. In the thresholded version, a

> > threshold has been applied to the average BA label, to make it have

> > an area as close as possible to the average area of the individual BA labels. I hope this makes sense.

> >

> > a.y

<snip>