External Email - Use Caution
Dear Matthew,
thank you for this important point. I will check this. There might be just a few subjects with 8 and 32 head coil, so that it should be possible to discard them without affecting the
sample size too much.
Do you think, you could give use some general hint to the ‘prescan normalize’ option? We cannot guess the benefit for our analysis well. Generally, if the benefit
is rather low, we would tend to use the data without ‘prescan normalize’. What do you think?
Thank you, all best
Pavol
Von: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Im Auftrag von Glasser, Matthew
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. September 2020 15:44
An: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] Prescan normalize and freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution
That alone will be a huge factor in variable SNR (and receive field). Head coils are not interchangeable like that.
Matt.
From:
<freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of "Mikolas, Pavol" <Pavol.Mikolas@uniklinikum-dresden.de>
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2020 at 7:22 AM
To: 'Freesurfer support list' <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Prescan normalize and freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Matt,
unfortunately we have no highres T2w or FLAIR.
In this multicentric study, we tended to use the 12 head coil. However, some centers used a 8 or a 32 head coil.
Thanks
Pavol
Von:
freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Im Auftrag von Glasser, Matthew
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. September 2020 14:14
An: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] Prescan normalize and freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution
What head coil did you use? Do you have a highres T2w or FLAIR?
Matt.
From:
<freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of "Mikolas, Pavol" <Pavol.Mikolas@uniklinikum-dresden.de>
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2020 at 7:12 AM
To: "'freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu'" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: [Freesurfer] Prescan normalize and freesurfer
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Freesurfer Developers,
I am analyzing the T1 Data of a multicentric study (N=309, 6 Centers) using Freesurfer. I found out, that most of the scans were performed with the ‘prescan normalize’ option. However, by approx.. 12 % of participants,
this option is missing. I also have complete data of all participants WITHOUT prescan normalize. In this analysis, we are interested in the correlation of GM volume in specific ROIs with clinical symptoms. Now we have two options:
It would be very helpful, if you could share your arguments / experience with this, so that we proceed in the best manner.
Thank you, best regards
Pavol
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender
via telephone or return mail.
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender
via telephone or return mail.