For this one, you don't need a mask. Also, don't use --no-log10p (the output of mri_glmfit is in log10p). --thfile needs an argument (eg, threshold.dat)External Email - Use Caution
Thanks so much for your answer.
Could you check if the following commands to perform ROI analysis with GLM are correct?
1. Create the table with the volumes of the hippocampal segmentation (1 command for each hemisphere - only replace lh with rh):
asegstats2table --statsfile hipposubfields.lh.T1.v21.stats--fsgd CU_CI.fsgd \--meas volume \--all-segs \--tablefile hipposubfields.lh.T1.v21.CU_CI.dat
2. GLM Analysis – DODS (1 command for each hemisphere - only replace lh with rh):
mri_glmfit \--table hipposubfields.lh.T1.v21.CU_CI.dat \--fsgd CU_CI.fsgd dods \--C group.diff.CU_CI.mtx \--glmdir hipposubfields.lh.T1.v21.CU_CI.glmdir
3. Correction for multiple comparisons – FDR:
mri_fdr --fdr .05 --pos --thfile --i contrast/lh.sig.mgh lh.mask.mgh hipposubfields.lh.T1.v21.CU_CI.mgh --no-log10p --i contrast/rh.sig.mgh rh.mask.mgh hipposubfields.rh.T1.v21.CU_CI.mgh --no-log10p
No, it would make no sense here because this is an ROI analysis
Are these commands correct?
Another question, in this type of analysis is image smoothing common? Like was done here MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg52203.html
Thank you so much again!
Best regards,
Laura Willers de SouzaMaster Student in Biochemistry
Zimmer Lab - Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
- Porto Alegre/RS - Brazil