thanks, Bruce - that is what I am learning. And if it was to smooth data from a sulcal probability map? A FWHM of 10 seems pretty high....

best

Trisanna

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

Hi Trisanna

sorry, there is no easy answer to this question. It depends on what you
are trying to do.

Bruce
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, Trisanna Sprung-Much wrote:

> Hi there
> I am wondering whether there is an acceptable FWHM to use to smooth surface
> data (for instance, a probability map)?
>
> Many thanks
>
> Trisanna
> --
> Ph.D. CandidateMcGill University
> Integrated Program in Neuroscience
> Psychology
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.