Hi Bruce,

    Thanks for your help. But I have a doubt in why we should do in this way? Are there any principles or mechanisms in Qdec?

Sincerely,
Zheng






At 2017-11-27 10:47:49, "Bruce Fischl" <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Yes

On Nov 26, 2017, at 9:40 PM, Ö£·ïÁ« <13181786167@163.com> wrote:

Hi Bruce,
    That is, I should set eTIV at Nuisance Factors for volume and surface area, not for thickness in qdec, is it right?

<qdec.PNG>



At 2017-11-27 10:22:05, "Bruce Fischl" <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: >you should correct for eTIV for volume (but not for thickness) >On Mon, 27 >Nov 2017, Ö£·ïÁ« wrote: > >> Hi Greve, >>     Only for age and surface area, no thickness or volume, is it right? >> >> Thanks! >> Zheng >> >> >> >> >> At 2017-11-26 03:04:26, "Douglas Greve" <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: >> >> Yes, for age and surface area. >> >> >> On 11/23/17 2:05 AM, Ö£·ïÁ« wrote: >> Hi professors, >>      >>     I am using Qdec in Freesurfer. I want to study the relationships between age and >> cortical thickness, age and cortical volume, age and surface area. Is it necessary to >> corrected by eTIV for volume and surface area in Qdec? >>     I am looking forward to your reply. >> >> Thanks, >> Zheng >> >> >> >>   >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> >> >> >> >> >>   >> >> >>



 

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer