what resolution?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
This was a fairly regular MPRAGE, unfortunately not very well optimized for
contrast. However, the main issue seems to be that the data were acquired
with a surface coil here. That made some of the brain extremely bright
(close to the coil) and some of the brain pretty dark (far away from the
coil). In the screenshot that I sent you, there is some gray matter that has
values between 95-100, which is well captured by the pial surface, while the
grey matter in the more medial areas has values between 70 and 80. The
transition where the pial surface starts to fail is when the gray matter
values drop from above 90 to below 90.
Caspar
2013/10/3 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
hmmmm. Can you tell us more about the acquisition?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
the white matter is mostly between 100 and 110 in
these regions. at least in
the center of the wm, the voxels are almost all 110.
caspar
2013/10/3 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
is the WM in those regions already close to
110? No, there is no
way to normalize GM intensity (it has too much
biological
variability over the brain)
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik
wrote:
Thanks, Bruce. The problem is fairly
extensive. There is
no way to do
normalize grey matter intensity (the white
surface looks
pretty good)?Caspar
On Thursday, October 3, 2013, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
Hi Caspar
try putting control points in the white
matter where
the pial
surface doesn't get out far enough.
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Caspar M.
Schwiedrzik wrote:
Hi Freesurfer Experts,
I am working on a fairly noisy and
inhomogeneous
MPRAGE T1 and I am having
trouble getting the pial surface
to go all the
way
through the grey matter.
Please see screenshot attached.
These data
were
acquired with a surface coil
and the grey matter varies a lot
in intensity.
Interestingly, the pial
surface growing process fails
where the grey
matter
is fairly dark. I have
tried several rounds of
normalizing using the
N3
tool but that didn't change
anything.
Thanks for any advice on this,
Caspar
The information in this e-mail is
intended only for
the person
to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail
was sent to
you in error
and the e-mail
contains patient information, please
contact the
Partners
Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline .
If the
e-mail was sent
to you in error
but does not contain patient
information, please
contact the
sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.