Oh, another question: do your patients have white-mater
hypo/hyper-intensities, in other words any voxels in the white matter that
are classified as something other than white matter in the freesurfer
aseg?
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Sean Hatton wrote:
> Hi Freesurfer gurus,
>
> I have been using Tracula to investigate white matter abnormalities in a patient
> cohort (n=20) compared to matched controls (n=40). In line with the literature, we
> expected to see reductions in FA in the patients' tracts but instead they have
> significantly higher FA means. To double-check, we ran TBSS over the same cohorts and
> got the results as per the literature (I.e. reduced FA in the patient group). The FA,
> RD, AD, MD and volume outputs are normally distributed and there are no extreme
> outliners. So wondering:
> 1. The patient group had significantly reduced tract volumes. If this volume
> calculation is incorrect I expect it could influence the calculation of the mean
> FA, RD, AD etc. Is there a way of checking the volume and subsequent
> calculations?
> 2. Yendiki et al 2011 had no corrections – do I need corrections?
> 3. Should I be thresholding tract stats?
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Sean Hatton
> Brain and Mind Research Institute
> University of Sydney
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.