Alright, thanks for all of your input!

Jessica

2011/6/24 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Hi Jessica

yes, probably. With so many differences (sequence, field strength, coil) it will be really hard to get anything out of a combined dataset.

sorry
Bruce

On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Jessica Liu wrote:

Hi Dr. Fischl,

Thanks for your comments.  The aim of my study is to analyze the brain
volume in AD subjects.  Most of the study was scanned on the 1.5T
(single-channel head coil) with a few subjects rescanned on the 3T
(12-channel head coil), so we would like to compare the brain volume of the
same subject on both scanners.  In addition, the protocols on the two
scanners didn't match exactly due to the limitations of our over
15-years-old 1.5T scanner (i.e. non-isotropic voxel size).  From your
comment, I gather that the 1.5T data is rather imprecise/unreliable.  Since
I'm a summer student, do you recommend that I should concentrate on
analyzing the 3T data only, and hopefully all of the subjects can be
rescanned on the 3T?  Thanks!

Jessica Liu

2011/6/23 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
     Hi Jessica,

     the 1.5t scan looks kind of washed out and low contrast, but of
     course it's hard to tell from an image. The 3T looks much
     crisper. Were the sequence parameters matched? I'm not sure what
     you're trying to show with this. The 3T multi-channel scan will
     have a much, much higher SNR than the 1.5T single channel, so
     the results will not at all be comparable.

     Bruce


     On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Jessica Liu wrote:

     Looking at the scans (attached, 3T on the left and 1.5T on
     the right, yellow
     hippocampus), I think you've made a good point.  More
     comments are much
     appreciated, thanks!

     Jessica Liu

     2011/6/23 Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior
     <ppj@netfilter.com.br>
          This is not normal. Maybe you should check the aseg
     volume for
          improper segmentation.


     On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 19:27, Jessica Liu
     <jessicaliu92@gmail.com>
     wrote:
     Hi everyone!

     I'm currently a summer student working at a lab which uses
     Freesurfer to measure hippocampal volumes.  I noticed that
     scanning the same patient first on a GE 3T (Multi-channel
     head
     coil) and then a GE 1.5T (single-channel head coil) 24
     hours
     later resulted in a 30% increase in the left hippocampus
     volume
     and a 18% increase for the right hippocampus based on the
     values
     in aseg.stats.  Can anyone please comment on this and
     explain
     the large discrepancies?  Thanks!

     Jessica Liu

     _______________________________________________
     Freesurfer mailing list
     Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
     https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


     The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
     person
     to whom it is
     addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
     error
     and the e-mail
     contains patient information, please contact the Partners
     Compliance HelpLine at
     http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
     sent
     to you in error
     but does not contain patient information, please contact
     the
     sender and properly
     dispose of the e-mail.