Do you suggest using random-effect model? Is there any problem with using a fix-effect model (other than the fact that by using this model we can not predict response of subjects outside our population)?
It should be roughly the sum of the dofs of the individual subjects. Why are you using a fixed-effects model?
doug
SHAHIN NASR wrote:
Thanks Doug. Just one related question. Should I also generate a new ffxdof.dat file for this map? I assumed that ffxdof depends on the number of subjects (session) and since number of subjects (sessions) is the same between the two groups then I can use those values, generated by isxconcat-sess for either map1 or map2. Right?
greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Douglas N Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:
Hi Shahin, it is not as simple as doing a subtraction of the
cesvar files. What you are trying to get is the expected variance
of your difference between the ces files (as a variance, it must
be positive). To get this you need
cesvardiff = (cesvar1+cesvar2)/(2^2)
The 2^2 is the number of inputs (2) squared.
doug
SHAHIN NASR wrote:
Hi,
I have generated two different functional connectivity maps
for two different ROI-based seeds. These maps are based on
group-average of the same subjects (generated by using
separate isxconcat-sess commands ), and now I want to see the
difference map. To do so, I used mris_calc as below.
> mris_calc -o diff_map/rh.ces.nii map1/rh.ces.nii sub map2/rh.ces.nii
Also, to generate the rh.cesvar.nii file I used this command:
> mris_calc -o diff_map1/rh.cesvar.nii map1/rh.cesvar.nii
sub map2/rh.cesvar.nii
But then when I used the glmfit with WLS option as below:
> mri_glmfit --y rh.ces.nii --osgm --glmdir rh.ffx.osgm.wls
--nii --mask ../rh.mask.nii --yffxvar rh.cesvar.nii
--ffxdofdat ../ffxdof.dat --surf fsaverage rh --wls rh.cesvar.nii
I faced an error saying: "Error: MRInormWeights: values less
than or eq to 0" which I assumed is related to an error in
rh.cesvar.nii file (am I right?). Would you tell me how can I
fix this problem?
P.S.: please note that sequence of subjects and all MRI
parameters are exactly the same between the two maps.
-- Shahin Nasr
PhD in Cognitive Neuroscience
Martinos Imaging Center, MGH
Harvard Medical School
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
Phone Number: 617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358> Fax: 617-726-7422
<tel:617-726-7422>
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
<http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting>
FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
<http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to
whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and
the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners
Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to
you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the
sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
--
Shahin Nasr
PhD in Cognitive Neuroscience
Martinos Imaging Center, MGH
Harvard Medical School
--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html