Alright, thanks. Would you recommend against using the new longitudinal stream with data generated from a previous version though? That is my main question. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Bruce Fischl <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu">fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">no, there are other differences as well.<br>
<br>
Bruce<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Erica Griffith wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi all,<br>
<br>
Does anyone have experience running a longitudinal analysis in version 5.0,<br>
using .mgz files generated from the last version of freesurfer? My<br>
understanding is that the only major differences between the previous and<br>
current versions were in the longitudinal stream. Any input would be<br>
appreciated! Thanks.<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br></div></div>
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is<br>
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail<br>
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at<br>
<a href="http://www.partners.org/complianceline" target="_blank">http://www.partners.org/<u></u>complianceline</a> . If the e-mail was sent to you in error<br>
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly<br>
dispose of the e-mail.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>