The aseg.stats is generated with partial volume estimation
On 4/25/17 12:40 PM, Gamaliz wrote:
I wrote an algorithm which uses the number of pixels per region in the aseg+aparc.mgz file. As this file has 1x1x1mm3 I was expecting the number of pixels to match very closely the value of the volume; as each pixel represents a 1 mm3 cube.(I did the same for cortical volume and got a similar result, with an even larger discrepancy).
The aseg.stats file lists the nVoxel value, and it is basically the volume rounded up.here are some sample values for subcortical regions:
Left-Lateral-Ventricle Volume (mm3): 7829.8Left-Lateral-Ventricle (number of Pixels in aseg+aparc.mgz): 7396Left-Inf-Lat-Vent Volume (mm3):594Left-Inf-Lat-Vent(number of Pixels in aseg+aparc.mgz):569Left-Cerebellum-White-MatterVolume (mm3):12668 Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter(number of Pixels in aseg+aparc.mgz): 12203Left-Cerebellum-Cortex Volume (mm3):44113.2Left-Cerebellum-Cortex(number of Pixels in aseg+aparc.mgz): 43804Left-Thalamus-Proper Volume (mm3):5752.8Left-Thalamus-Proper(number of Pixels in aseg+aparc.mgz): 5899
Pretty much the values are close to the volume, but different enough to be significant. I wonder why this discrepancy.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard. edu/mailman/listinfo/ freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/ freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.