You can just google those values for each scanner.

For example:

MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.google.com/search?q=nema+fwhm+siemens+mMR

 

Second result links directly to the Siemens website:

MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/magnetic-resonance-imaging/mr-pet-scanner/biograph-mmr

 

There, it is stated:

Transverse spatial resolution (NEMA 2012)

FWHM @ 1 cm : 4.6 mm

 

 

You can also determine the parameters yourself by following the NEMA standards.

 

Best

Michael

 

 

Von: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Im Auftrag von WONG Wan Wa
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. April 2024 12:03
An: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] PetSurfer: Can kinetic modeling be applied to PET data with single frame?

 

WARNUNG: Diese E-Mail kam von außerhalb der Organisation. Klicken Sie nicht auf Links oder öffnen Sie keine Anhänge, es sei denn, Sie kennen den Absender und wissen, dass der Inhalt sicher ist.

 

        External Email - Use Caution        

How to determine the PSF?

From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of WONG Wan Wa <angelwong@ust.hk>
Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 12:14 PM
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PetSurfer: Can kinetic modeling be applied to PET data with single frame?

 

        External Email - Use Caution        

Any idea about the PSF?

From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of WONG Wan Wa <angelwong@ust.hk>
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 12:36 PM
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PetSurfer: Can kinetic modeling be applied to PET data with single frame?

 

        External Email - Use Caution        

Hi Douglas,

 

Here is the information given by the technician from the PET center:

 

There are a total of 3 machines used for PIB PET/CT or PET/MR scans

 

  1. PET/CT1 ( mCT)(contain "mCT" in the pet series)

Manufacturer: Siemens
ManufacturersModelName: Biograph128_mCT

recon method : TrueX + TOF (ultra HD-PET)

iteration: 5 subset:21 matrix: 400x400

zoom: 2.0  Gaussian filter FWHM: 2.0mm

 

  1. PET/CT2 (Vision)(contain "Vis" in the pet series)

Manufacturer: Siemens
ManufacturersModelName: Biograph128Edge_Vision 600

recon method:  TrueX + TOF (ultra HD-PET)

iteration: 8 subset: 5 matrix: 512x512

zoom: 2.0  Gaussian filter FWHM: 2.0mm

 

  1. PET/MR (mMR)

Manufacturer: Siemens
ManufacturersModelName: Biograph_mMR

recon method: HD-PET

iteration: 5 subset: 21 matrix: 344x344

zoom:2.0 Gaussian filter FWHM:2.0mm

 

Thanks,

Angel

 

From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Douglas N. Greve <dgreve@MGH.HARVARD.EDU>
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2024 5:23 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PetSurfer: Can kinetic modeling be applied to PET data with single frame?

 

That 2mm for the gaussian is just the post-processing filter and does not represent the full amount of partial volume effect. What kind of scanner is it?

On 3/22/2024 12:42 AM, WONG Wan Wa wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution        

Hi Douglas,

 

Thanks for your clarification. This is my first time to run PetSurfer. We did want to normalize by cerebellar grey matter, and I will add the "--rescale 8 47". I just copied "6" from the example command. I know "6" should be the FWHM of the point-spread function (PSF) of the scanner as measured in image space. I did ask the technician at the PET centre, and he replied that the reconstruction method was "OP-OSEM 8i21s" and the filter was "XYZ gaussian 2.00". Can I use "2" for psf in the command?

 

Thanks,

Angel

 

From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Douglas N. Greve <dgreve@MGH.HARVARD.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 9:44 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PetSurfer: Can kinetic modeling be applied to PET data with single frame?

 

Yes, though that will normalize by the pons. If you want to normalize by something else, you will need to specify it with --rescale. Eg, if  you want to normalize by ceberbellar gray matter, add
--rescale 8 47
Where did you get "6" from for the psf?

On 3/20/2024 10:57 PM, WONG Wan Wa wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution        

Hi Douglas,

 

Thanks for your reply. We used different tracers for diagnosis of AD or other neurodegenerative diseases, including PIB, FDG, Flutemetamol and TAU. If an SUV analysis is used, is it done by mri_gtmpvc? Is there any subsequent analysis needed?

 

This is my mri_gtmpvc command:

mri_gtmpvc \

  --i $SUBJECTS_DIR/sub-QM001/pet/sub-QM001_ses-001_trc-C11PIB_rec-05MINS_run-001_pet.nii.gz \

  --reg $SUBJECTS_DIR/sub-QM001/pet/sub-QM001_ses-001_trc-C11PIB_rec-05MINS_run-001_pet.reg.lta \

  --psf 6 \

  --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/sub-QM001/mri/gtmseg.mgz \

  --default-seg-merge  \

  --auto-mask 1 .01 \

  --mgx .01 \

  --o $SUBJECTS_DIR/sub-QM001/pet/gtmpvc.output

 

Is this command okay?

 

Thanks,

Angel

 

From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Douglas N. Greve <dgreve@mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 11:27 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] PetSurfer: Can kinetic modeling be applied to PET data with single frame?

 

you cannot apply kinetic modeling to one frame. What is you ligand? For a one frame acquisition, you usually use an SUV analysis.

On 3/20/2024 12:03 AM, WONG Wan Wa wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution        

Hi experts,

 

As stated in the subject, can kinetic modeling be applied to PET data with only one frame? Or we just stop at ROI analysis without kinetic modeling?

 

Best,

Angel

 



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

 



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

 



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer