Hi Bruce,
Thanks a lot for your reply . Is there anyway that I can get a mask for a certain class (e.g WM) after partial volume correction using FS ? Or is it possible for you to provide more details of it so I can reproduce the calculation to get the mask ?
Anthony
--- On Thu, 5/3/09, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
From: Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] partial volume correction in mri_segstats To: "Anthony" <slam_ono@yahoo.com> Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Date: Thursday, 5 March, 2009, 9:33 AM
Hi Anthony,
it should be more accurate (and more reliable in our studies). It estimates the volume fraction of each tissue
class on the border of the structure, assuming it is mixed with adjacent classes by estimating the local mean of the two tissue classes, then computing the mixing coefficients that explain the observed intensity. Thus for example if you have a dark hippocampal voxel bordering ventricle it will compute that the voxel has a fair amount of ventricle in it.
cheers, Bruce
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Anthony wrote:
> Hi all, > > > > In recon-all pipeline , mri_segstats runs with -pv mri/norm.mgz > option ,as written from > http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/mri_segstats , it is used to > compensate partial voluming. I wonder what exactly does this do, as the volumes given by aseg.stats are different from > aseg.mgz and why is it more accurate ? I will appreciate if anyone could help to clarify this . > > Thanks > > > >
Get your new Email address! > Grab the Email name you've always wanted before someone else does! > http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/aa/ _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
|