This is very helpful, Doug. Then I should the value in aseg.stats. Thank you very much.


On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Douglas Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

Hi Cherry, the total gray matter volume in aseg.stats is a combination of the two approaches. For cortical structures, it computes the volume using surface-based methods. The subcortical structures it uses the volume-based method. To compute total GM, you need both.
doug



On 9/16/13 9:11 PM, Yizhou Ma wrote:
Dear Freesurfer experts,

I'm doing ROI analysis on surface area and gray matter volume using the aparc.2009 parcellation. Now that I wanted to use corresponding whole brain measures as covariates, I could not find whole brain gray matter volume measures in the aparc.a2009s.stats file. However, I find one in the aseg.stats file. Since I believe these two file use different approaches to estimate gray matter volume, I'm stuck with what I choose for the whole brain measure. Do I use the value in aseg.stats or do I add up the volumes of regions in aparc.a2009s.stats? And advice is appreciated.

Thanks,
Cherry 


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.