Thank you so much for your reply.

Yes, It does make a separate r and p for each run.

But, I would like to have one correlation coefficient for each subject, so I can compare them to each other.

Based on help, I should average runs before comparing across subjects. My question is how should I average runs? Should average the .dat files? the r values?


Thanks

Mona



From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <DGREVE@mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 5:33:09 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] fcseedcor_multiple runs
 
Looking at the help, it looks like it will produce a separate file for
each run for each session. Is that what you want?

On 2/1/19 9:41 AM, Nasiriavanaki, Zahra wrote:
>
> Dear Freesurfers
>
>
> Hi
>
>
> I have been doing seed to seed connectivity analysis using fcseedcor.
>
> I have multiple runs for each subject, and based on the fcseedcor
> help, I am supposed to average runs before comparing across subjects.
>
> So, does it mean I should average all seed.dat files and the
> regressors (including vscf,wm,global waveform, mcprextreg) across runs?
>
> I appreciate your time and consideration.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Mona
>
>
>
> *Zahra (Mona) Nasiriavanaki*
>
> Postdoctoral Research Fellow
>
> Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
>
> Massachusetts General Hospital
>
> 149 13th Street, 149-2615
>
> Charlestown, MA, USA, 02129
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer