Il giorno 11 nov 2020, alle ore 17:32, Douglas N. Greve <dgreve@mgh.harvard.edu> ha scritto:

There is not a summary table, it is just a map. Do you want a cluster table?

On 11/10/2020 11:26 AM, Paula Maldonado wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution        

Thanks for your reply, that worked. Can you please tell me where I can find a summary table of the activated regions resulting from the conjunction analysis?

Best regards,

Paula

Il giorno 27 ott 2020, alle ore 22:50, Douglas N. Greve <dgreve@mgh.harvard.edu> ha scritto:

You would just run mkcontrast-sess, eg, if your four conditions are
ordered condA, condAcontrol, condB, condBcont, then
mkcontrast-sess -analysis analysis -contrast contrastname -a 1 -c 2 -c 3
-a 4
If you want it reversed, then just reverse the a's and c's

On 10/23/2020 4:39 AM, Paula Maldonado wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution

Dear experts,
I am running an fMRI experiment in which I have four conditions: two main conditions (condition A and condition B) and two respective control conditions (condition Acontrol and condition Bcontrol).
I would like to create a map showing significantly greater activity for condition A relative to condition B, after subtracting out the activity for the respective control conditions. In other words, I would like to perform the following contrast:
(condition A - condition A control) - (condition B - condition B control)
Then I would like to have a map that shows the reverse contrast too:(condition B - condition B control) - (condition A - condition A control).

How do I do that?To obtain the first map: (condition A - condition A control) - (condition B - condition B control) I have tried with the mergecontrasts-sess function with the -conjunction flag and the OR option as detailed below:
mergecontrasts-sess -mergedcontrast conjres -conjunction or -analysis analysisname -map sig -space sph -isxavg fixed -contrast Contrast1 2 pos 0 -contrast Contrast 2 pos 0 -s sessionsfMRI/Sub01/bold -hemi lh

where Contrast1= (condition A - condition A control) and Contrast2= (condition B - condition B control)
however the map I get is exactly the same as (condition A - condition A control), as if subtracting out Contrast 2 had no impact on the map.

Thanks,

Paula



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer