Thanks, Koen. The issue is in my preliminary study this is the only subfield that shows a significant difference. So do you think it would still be worth reporting?
Hi Shashwath,
The label "hippocampus" was used in the tail of the hippocampus, where
the manual labelers (who labeled the data our automated method is
trained on) stopped trying to distinguish between the different
subfields. If you want to compute the volume of the whole hippocampus,
then you should take this in account - otherwise you can probably
ignore it.
Hope this helps,
Koen
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Shashwath Meda <shashwath123@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Koen - I am looking at some hippocampal subfield measures on 3T and 7T
> and noticed that there is a label called "hippocampus" from your recent
> publications it was unclear what this label exactly meant? Is this a useful
> subfield measure to be considered for further analysis? What does this
> particular segment represent?
> Thanks,
> Shashwath Meda
>
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.