average what? The different voxel size images?
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Alex Cohen wrote:
I will likely end up running each separately on several subjects to get a
handle on how they're behaving; however assuming I did what to average them,
have you all found a particular method more useful than another for this?
i.e., mri_robust_register, bbregister, etc...
-Alex
------------------------------------------------------------ ----
Alexander Li Cohen, M.D., Ph.D.
E-mail: Alexander.Cohen2@childrens.harvard.edu (Medical/Science Email)
E-mail: alexcohen@gmail.com (Lifetime Email)
------------------------------------------------------------ ----
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
wrote:
Hi Alex
you get to decide whether to average your data or not. It's a
totally empirical question which one is better - why don't you
run them each and visually inspect the results?
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Alex Cohen wrote:
Hi all, What is the current best practice recommendation
for using multiple
T1s and/or T2s for recon-all where the sizes of the images
are slightly
different.
For instance: two T1w images of 0.9x0.9x0.9 and 1x1x1
resolution, however
the 1x1x1 image seems to have better grey-white
separation, etc...
Separately, am I correct in my assessment that presently
freesurfer will
only use 1 T2 or FLAIR image and isn't doing averaging?
-Alex
------------------------------------------------------------ ----
Alexander Li Cohen, M.D., Ph.D.
E-mail: Alexander.Cohen2@childrens.harvard.edu
(Medical/Science Email)
E-mail: alexcohen@gmail.com (Lifetime Email)
------------------------------------------------------------ ----
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:10 PM,
<freesurfer-request@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >
wrote:
Send Freesurfer mailing list submissions to
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
visit
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
or, via email, send a message with subject or body
'help' to
freesurfer-request@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
freesurfer-owner@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
is more
specific
than "Re: Contents of Freesurfer digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: mris_make_surfaces error with
bbr-init-header (Sneha
Pandya)
2. Re: mris_make_surfaces error with
bbr-init-header (Bruce
Fischl)
3. Re: WM lobes and Corpus Callosum (Bharadwaj,
Pradyumna -
(prad))
4. Re: WM lobes and Corpus Callosum (Yendiki,
Anastasia)
5. Re: mris_make_surfaces error with
bbr-init-header (Sneha
Pandya)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sneha Pandya <snp2003@med.cornell.edu>
To: Freesurfer support list
<freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >
Cc:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:11:17 +0000
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_make_surfaces error
with
bbr-init-header
Hi Bruce,
Total is 231111108 kB from /proc/meminfo and flair
vozel size is
1.0000, 0.9766, 0.9766.
I ran quite a few recon-all after this one failed
and it did not
complain. It just fails when I run recon-all
-autorecon3 with
-bbr-init-header flag.
Thanks,
Sneha
<freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.ha____________________________________________________________ _______________
_
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > on behalf of Bruce
Fischl
<fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 11:09:36 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_make_surfaces error with
bbr-init-header
Hi Sneha
how much RAM do you have in your machine? And what is the
resolution
of
your data?
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Sneha Pandya wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> I have successfully ran recon-all on my subjects with multiple
T1s.
We want
> to use flair to refine pial surfaces as for all the subjects
pial
surfaces
> are messy and will demand lots of control point edits.
>
>
>
> After successfully running entire recon-all stream I am
running
following
> command to incorporate flair:
>
>
> recon-all -autorecon3 \
> -s SUBJ \
> -bbr-init-header \
> -FLAIRpial \
> -bigventricles \
> -openmp 12 \
> -qcache
>
> When I run above command recon-all exits while implementing
> mris_make_surfaces with an error "Cannot allocate memory"
>
> Can someone guide what is happening? Is it that there are
large
topological
> error or bbr-init-header flag will only run if I run recon-all
from
> autorecon1 to autorecon3 stage?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sneha
>
>
>
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >
Cc:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:20:07 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_make_surfaces error with
bbr-init-header
hmmm, can you send us the recon-all.log file?
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Sneha Pandya wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Total is 231111108 kB from /proc/meminfo and flair vozel
size is 1.0000,
0.9766, 0.9766.
I ran quite a few recon-all after this one failed and it
did not complain.
It just fails when I run recon-all -autorecon3 with
-bbr-init-header flag.
Thanks,
Sneha
____________________________________________________________ _______________
_
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > on behalf of
Bruce Fischl
<fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 11:09:36 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_make_surfaces error with
bbr-init-header
Hi Sneha
how much RAM do you have in your machine? And what is the
resolution of
your data?
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Sneha Pandya wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> I have successfully ran recon-all on my subjects with
multiple T1s. We
want
> to use flair to refine pial surfaces as for all the
subjects pial surfaces
> are messy and will demand lots of control point edits.
>
>
>
> After successfully running entire recon-all stream I am
running following
> command to incorporate flair:
>
>
> recon-all -autorecon3 \
> -s SUBJ \
> -bbr-init-header \
> -FLAIRpial \
> -bigventricles \
> -openmp 12 \
> -qcache
>
> When I run above command recon-all exits while
implementing
> mris_make_surfaces with an error "Cannot allocate
memory"
>
> Can someone guide what is happening? Is it that there
are large
topological
> error or bbr-init-header flag will only run if I run
recon-all from
> autorecon1 to autorecon3 stage?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sneha
>
>
>
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad)" <prad@email.arizona.edu>
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >
Cc:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:48:13 +0000
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] WM lobes and Corpus Callosum
Hello Anastasia,
Thank you for your reply!
I had created the 4 WM lobes for each hemisphere to extract
regional
volumes for white matter lesions in each lobe.
As some of our participants have WML in the corpus callosum very
close
to the midline, they are not included in the WM lobes created
earlier.
Do I need to manually edit the labels for the parts of the
corpus
callosum between the hemispheres to have them be included in one
of
the lobes ?
Or is there some alternate way to split the CC in aseg.mgz along
the hemispheric midline and assign its parts to the WM in
each hemisphere ?
Best,
-Prad
____________________________________________________________ _______________
_
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu rvard.edu > on behalf of Yendiki,
Anastasia <AYENDIKI@mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 5:05 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] WM lobes and Corpus Callosum
Hi Prad - mri_aparc2aseg assigns WM voxels to the nearest
cortical
region from the cortical parcellation. Which cortical region
would you
want to assign the corpus callosum to? What's labeled as corpus
callosum in the aseg is the part of the corpus callosum between
the 2
hemis.
Best,
a.y
____________________________________________________________ _______________
_
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ______________________________
[freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ] on behalf of Bharadwaj,
Pradyumna - (prad) [prad@email.arizona.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 5:37 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: [Freesurfer] WM lobes and Corpus Callosum
Hi,
I've been trying to create WM lobes using the following steps:
1) mri_annotation2label --lobesStrict
2) Outputting the labels from step 1, & creating a simpler
annotation
without limbic and insular lobes
3) Labeling the WM using mri_aparc2aseg (mri_aparc2aseg --s
MySub
--annot Step2AnnotationFile --labelwm --hypo-as-wm --wmpar-dmax
20
--rip-unknown
However, as the corpus callosum is not labelled as wm, it is not
included in any WM lobe.
Is there any workaround to assigning the corpus callosum to the
different WM lobes or do I have to manually
edit aseg.mgz to change the corpus callosum's value to match
that
of WM ?
Thanks,
-Prad
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Yendiki, Anastasia" <AYENDIKI@mgh.harvard.edu>
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >
Cc:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:56:12 +0000
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] WM lobes and Corpus Callosum
Hi Prad - That part of the corpus callosum belongs neither to
the left
nor to the right hemi, it connects the two. So any split would
be
arbitrary. You could write a script that finds if a voxel is
closer to
the left or the right hemi for example.
Best,
a.y
______________________________ _______________
_
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ] on behalf of Bharadwaj,
Pradyumna - (prad) [prad@email.arizona.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 12:48 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] WM lobes and Corpus Callosum
Hello Anastasia,
Thank you for your reply!
I had created the 4 WM lobes for each hemisphere to extract
regional
volumes for white matter lesions in each lobe.
As some of our participants have WML in the corpus callosum very
close
to the midline, they are not included in the WM lobes created
earlier.
Do I need to manually edit the labels for the parts of the
corpus
callosum between the hemispheres to have them be included in one
of
the lobes ?
Or is there some alternate way to split the CC in aseg.mgz along
the hemispheric midline and assign its parts to the WM in
each hemisphere ?
Best,
-Prad
____________________________________________________________ _______________
_
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > on behalf of Yendiki,
Anastasia <AYENDIKI@mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 5:05 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] WM lobes and Corpus Callosum
Hi Prad - mri_aparc2aseg assigns WM voxels to the nearest
cortical
region from the cortical parcellation. Which cortical region
would you
want to assign the corpus callosum to? What's labeled as corpus
callosum in the aseg is the part of the corpus callosum between
the 2
hemis.
Best,
a.y
____________________________________________________________ _______________
_
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ______________________________
[freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ] on behalf of Bharadwaj,
Pradyumna - (prad) [prad@email.arizona.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 5:37 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: [Freesurfer] WM lobes and Corpus Callosum
Hi,
I've been trying to create WM lobes using the following steps:
1) mri_annotation2label --lobesStrict
2) Outputting the labels from step 1, & creating a simpler
annotation
without limbic and insular lobes
3) Labeling the WM using mri_aparc2aseg (mri_aparc2aseg --s
MySub
--annot Step2AnnotationFile --labelwm --hypo-as-wm --wmpar-dmax
20
--rip-unknown
However, as the corpus callosum is not labelled as wm, it is not
included in any WM lobe.
Is there any workaround to assigning the corpus callosum to the
different WM lobes or do I have to manually
edit aseg.mgz to change the corpus callosum's value to match
that
of WM ?
Thanks,
-Prad
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sneha Pandya <snp2003@med.cornell.edu>
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >
Cc:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:10:19 +0000
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_make_surfaces error with
bbr-init-header
Sure, please find it attached.
Thanks,
Sneha
______________________________ _______________
_
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > on behalf of Bruce
Fischl
<fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 12:20 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_make_surfaces error with
bbr-init-header
hmmm, can you send us the recon-all.log file?
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Sneha Pandya wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
>
> Total is 231111108 kB from /proc/meminfo and flair vozel size
is
1.0000,
> 0.9766, 0.9766.
>
>
> I ran quite a few recon-all after this one failed and it did
not
complain.
> It just fails when I run recon-all -autorecon3 with
-bbr-init-header
flag.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Sneha
>
>___________________________________________________________ _______________
_
_
> From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > on behalf of Bruce
Fischl
> <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 11:09:36 AM
> To: Freesurfer support list
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mris_make_surfaces error with
bbr-init-header
> Hi Sneha
>
> how much RAM do you have in your machine? And what is the
resolution
of
> your data?
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Sneha Pandya wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > I have successfully ran recon-all on my subjects with
multiple
T1s. We
> want
> > to use flair to refine pial surfaces as for all the subjects
pial
surfaces
> > are messy and will demand lots of control point edits.
> >
> >
> >
> > After successfully running entire recon-all stream I am
running
following
> > command to incorporate flair:
> >
> >
> > recon-all -autorecon3 \
> > -s SUBJ \
> > -bbr-init-header \
> > -FLAIRpial \
> > -bigventricles \
> > -openmp 12 \
> > -qcache
> >
> > When I run above command recon-all exits while implementing
> > mris_make_surfaces with an error "Cannot allocate memory"
> >
> > Can someone guide what is happening? Is it that there are
large
> topological
> > error or bbr-init-header flag will only run if I run
recon-all
from
> > autorecon1 to autorecon3 stage?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Sneha
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
to whom
it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
and the
contains patient information, please contact the Partners
Compliance
HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
to you
in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the
sender
and properly
dispose of the e-mail.