Dear list and especially Martin,

we have used Freesurfers crosssectional as well as the longitudinal stream
and are inspecting the outcomes at the moment.

We have as quality assurance been inspecting regions where the
difference between initial CROSS results and the corresponding LONG
results exceeds 10 %. In this process we found that for certain regions
it seems that the volume increases in almost every case. Below is an
overview of differences between cross and long with mean, sd, max and
min values in percent for different regions.

We also manually checked an example of the Caudate where there was an
increase of 14 % from CROSS to LONG. This difference can be seen
between  CROSS to LONG for time point 2. It seems like the longitudinal
is correct when it covers more of the Caudate. The other time point for
that subject and their base seems to provide extra information which is a good
thing.

However our question is why this seems to be a systematic
thing that all scans for the caudate region increases in volume when
doing the longitudinal processing?
This is also the case for some other regions as seen below.

Kind regards/

Melanie and Mark

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent volume changes between CROSS and LONG over 110 subjects:

Region	Mean	Sd	Max	Min
Estimated brain Volume	1	4	32	-18
Total Gray Matter Volume	1	1	5	-2
White Matter Volume	-1	1	2	-5
Caudate	5	2	14	0
Putamen	8	3	22	1
Thalamus	2	3	13	-10
Amygdala	-1	4	33	-8
Hippocampus	1	4	33	-5
Ventricles	0	2	5	-5
Frontal	0	2	6	-7
Parietal	2	2	8	-6
Temporal	1	2	5	-5
Occipital	1	2	9	-5