Hi Bruce,

Yes, I mean the one on the inflated surface.
I found this view easier to judge how well the label and the nii.gz match. Is that a problem?

Thanks, Esther

> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 08:36:27 -0400
> From: fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> To: estherkillat@hotmail.com
> CC: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] S_intraparietal-and_Parietal_transverse.label
>
> Hi Esther
>
> I don't see a volume overlay, just one on the inflated surface. Is that
> what you mean? If not, can you resend and explain?
>
> Bruce
>
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Esther Walton wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks so much for your input.
> >
> > Could somebody please answer the second part of the question?
> > That is, ignoring the fact that the label looks a bit weird as it is, is the overlay between the label and the volume okay, as seen in the second file I attached in my first email? If not, any idea what could have gone wrong?
> >
> > Thanks for all your help,
> >
> > Esther
> >
> > Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:36:06 +0200
> > From: christophe.destrieux@univ-tours.fr
> > To: estherkillat@hotmail.com
> > CC: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] S_intraparietal-and_Parietal_transverse.label
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Esther
> >
> > I had a look to the 2005 aparc for fsaverage and the intraparietal sulcus is indeed weird.
> >
> > Why don't you use the 2009 version of the atlas that includes major improvements ; this parcellation is fully described in
> >
> > Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. ; Destrieux C, Fischl B, Dale A, Halgren E. ; Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 15;53(1):1-15
> >
> > I let Bruce or Doug answer the second part of your question ; cheers
> >
> > PS I attached a snapshot of the 2009 parcellation for the same hemi
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>