I don't think very different, but certainly they will change
On Mon, 29 Jan
2018, elisabetta_delre@hms.harvard.edu wrote:
> Bruce, thank you so much.
>
> Another question: Would FS 6.0 give a very different output for cortical labels than FS 5.3?
>
> Thank you so much again,
> best,
> Elisabetta
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Hi Elisabetta
>
> I think in 5.3 we did not edit the aseg using the surfaces, which is
> probably the source of the discrepancy
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
> On Mon, 29 Jan
> 2018, elisabetta_delre@hms.harvard.edu wrote:
>
> > Hi FS team,
> > running FS 5.3 and checking the labelmaps, there are some differences between the aseg
> and the
> > aparc-aseg maps. The aparc-aseg are more inclusive.
> >
> > My understanding is that volumes for global measures are calculated from aseg. Could
> that cause
> > problems in accuracy?
> > Thank you so much,
> > best,
> > Elisabetta
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/ freesurfer
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
> > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
> > dispose of the e-mail.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/ freesurfer
>
>
>
>