Hi Renat,

 

The third defect is too large and it’s causing a crash. When I run it, it hangs forever at:

 

    CORRECTING DEFECT 3 (vertices=8808, convex hull=2020, v0=31369)

    An extra large defect has been detected...

    This often happens because cerebellum or dura has not been removed from wm.mgz.

    This may cause recon-all to run very slowly or crash.

 

There are huge gaps missing in this subject’s white matter mask, resulting in a bad surface tessellation (see attached pic). I would check out the info at https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/TopologicalDefect_freeview and fill in the wm.mgz to manually edit.

 

best

Andrew

 

 

From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Yakupov, Renat /DZNE <Renat.Yakupov@dzne.de>
Date: Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 4:21 AM
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 7 crashes during mris_fix_topology

        External Email - Use Caution        

Hi Andrew,

 

thank you for your reply. I just uploaded the subject's directory under the name "subject_from_RenatYakupov.tar.gz".

 

Regarding memory, I am running these jobs on our SGE cluster, which monitors memory usage. Both of the subject's images had maximum memory usage of slightly over 3GB, which is pretty typical from my experience. Interestingly, when processed with Freesurfer 6, which didnt crash and finished successfully, the maximum memory usage was around 11GB.

 

Thanks again and looking forward to your findings 😊

 

Best wishes,

Renat.


From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Hoopes, Andrew <AHOOPES@MGH.HARVARD.EDU>
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 7:51 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 7 crashes during mris_fix_topology

 

Hi Renat,

 

That 3rd defect is fairly large – normally it would hang but it’s possible you’re running out of memory. If you can zip the subject and file drop it to us, we can take a look:

 

MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FtpFileExchange

 

best,

Andrew

 

From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Yakupov, Renat /DZNE <Renat.Yakupov@dzne.de>
Date: Friday, April 30, 2021 at 11:49 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 7 crashes during mris_fix_topology

        External Email - Use Caution        

Dear all,

 

I have a subject whose Freesurfer processing crashes during topology fixing step. The last lines in `recon-all.log` are:

 

After retessellation of defect 2 (v0=22890), euler #=-15 (110444,329616,219157) : difference with theory (-18) = -3
CORRECTING DEFECT 3 (vertices=8808, convex hull=2020, v0=31369)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Linux compute-0-2.local 2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Apr 22 06:48:29 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
recon-all -s 81489f2bb-M12_T1_01 exited with ERRORS at Tue Apr 27 21:23:59 CEST 2021

For the full `recon-all.log` and `recon-all.error` files please see the attached files.

 

I tried to follow the manual topology fixing instructions from MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/TopologicalDefect_freeview, but *.white and *.pial surface files are missing from `surf` directory. It only contains these files:

 

lh.defect_borders  lh.defect_labels   lh.orig.nofix     lh.smoothwm.nofix  rh.orig.nofix     rh.smoothwm.nofix
lh.defect_chull    lh.inflated.nofix  lh.qsphere.nofix  rh.inflated.nofix  rh.qsphere.nofix

Which files can I use in place of white and pial surface files in order to look for WM segmentation defects?

 

Some additional information about the data:

- I am running Freesurfer 7.1

- overall, there are no gross errors in WM segmentation, although the subjects does have significant temporal lobe atrophy

- there are two images acquired at different times, and processing fails for both images

- interestingly, processing didnt crash with Freesurfer 6.

 

Thank you and have a great weekend,

Renat.