Yes, exactly on both questions

On 4/22/2021 8:23 AM, Marilena Wilding wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution        

        External Email - Use Caution        

Dear Freesurfers,

 

I’m currently doing 2nd level analysis on a FIR model.

I first concatenated my data with this command:

 

isxconcat-sess -sf sessidlist -analysis FIR_group.lh -contrast global-v-local -no-hrf -hemi lh -o group_analysis

 

I got 29 timepoints and their corresponding 29 ces.nii and cesvar.nii files.

 

Then I ran glmfit (for each timepoint):

 

mri_glmfit \

--y ces.000.nii \

--wls cesvar.000.nii.gz \

--surface fsaverage lh \

--glmdir group_GLM_lh_000.wls \

--osgm \

--nii.gz

 

In my paradigm I’m showing a stimulus that can be seen in two ways. In my analysis I separate the runs, depending on what the participant indicated to have seen (1 or 2) and compute the contrast in activation between these two percepts. I was now wondering if the command above is correct with the ‘osgm’-flag? Since I’m only interested in the difference between the two conditions from the paradigm and not different groups of participants (e.g. patients vs. healthy people) I don’t have to specify a fsgd file, correct? And if I wanted to specify covariates I’d just make such a file but without groups and only variables?

 

Thank you very much for your help!

 

Best,

Mara

 


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://secure-web.cisco.com/18FIMCOsI5wqUdaojOE96FRp-ohd90BN69a5pmuGGkuufYl9LEpDXPquhY7ShDLygNHrqbdsw8FC-g7__UxGMVuAFr91f_T_uSyxBT8dB8NlTRyeN5s9cUwQFFNkcG-FXU0H9vrSchOGbMhS_lHKD3DjTv9bBYjHymFdr6z_DmGt4ulwOJQDhfOobo-ejTqBRmpG8mxk4j5tLNQaSGN19Efu4wB10NOdL1dzaeE6u9wcjeasvkNGLz2GyHrY-gOvGiDwNCaTmZHM179n0M-y-5A/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer