Dear Doug,
Thanks for your comments. However, I am worried about the different number of voxels within each parcellation between subjects, if extracting fmri time course from individual parcellation result.
Also, I am using the following combined commands to carry out the steps. Do you think it's correct?
reg-feat2anat --feat SUBID/bold.feat --subject SUBID
aseg2feat --feat SUBID/bold.feat --aseg aparcs+aseg
mri_segstats --seg SUBID/bold.feat/reg/freesurfer/aparc.a2009s+aseg.nii.gz --in filtered_fun_data.nii.gz -avgwf file.dat
Thanks,
Liang
definitely use the individuals. Use mri_vol2surf to convert the motion
corrected (and otherwise unsmoothed) fmri time courses to the
surface. Then use mri_segstats with the --avgwf and --annot options
to compute the mean time course over the parcellations.
doug
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010, liang wang wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know one of studies which uses the parcellations (aparc or
aparc.a2009s) Freesurfer provides to extract fMRI time course from each
subject's fMRI data. Reading the instructions in Freesurfer Wiki, I know how
to do that. However, I am not sure whether I should use the parcellations
from the average output (obtained from make_average_subject), or the
parcellations based on each subject. I would next compute functional
connectivity between these regions. I am appreciated for any suggestions.
Liang
--Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
MGH-NMR Center
greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.