Hi Antonin,

Thanks a lot. Those links are very helpful for me!

Cheers,
S

-- 
Shane Schofield

On 26 February 2017 at 12:51:23, Antonin Skoch (ansk@ikem.cz) wrote:

Dear Shane,

the "topological defect" in FreeSurfer jargon means that the estimated surface contains errors like "holes" or "handles".

See

PPT from FreeSurfer course
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/docs/freesurfer.failure_modes.ppt
or
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/TroubleshootingData

XL (=extra large?) defect often means large error in previous steps of recon-all, usually skullstrip or white matte segmentation. In some cases the error is automatically corrected, but not always.

To see, what is happening, I would suggest to inspect brainmask.mgz or wm.mgz and correct errors.

You can also find more information on the forum, there are quite large amount of posts related to topological defects.
For example:
http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg30763.html

Antonin Skoch


Hi Freesurfer Team, I am running recon-all on Freesurfer version 6. A few of my subjects have “XL defect detected …” and their recon-all have been running for more than 20 hours. I hope this is not a silly question, but will this XL defect be corrected eventually…?
Another question, what are “defects”? Is there anything I could do to the raw  
T1 before recon-all?

Thanks!

Shane
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.