Thanks for the response. Is this masking out of the cortical regions in the volume analysis a newer aspect of the processing stream? Previously I have seen this activation in the volume.
It would be great if you could let me know the flags to see the full volume analysis.
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 13:15:37 -0400
From: Emily Boeke <
eboeke01@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: [Freesurfer] Different results in surface and volume analyses
To:
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduMessage-ID: <
948E8FDF-754A-4AE0-A0C9-86D848F1438A@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hello everyone,
I am looking at a visual stimulus vs fixation contrast in my individual subjects' data to make sure we are seeing normal activation there. If I look at the surface data in tksurfer, I see activation in the occipital cortex, but in the mni305 analysis, there is no activation in this region.
These are the preprocess , mkanalysis, and selxavg commands I used for the surface vs. mni305:
preproc-sess -s amur_dss -df sesspar -per-run -fwhm 5 -sliceorder down -surface fsaverage lhrh -mni305-2mm -fsd cond
mkanalysis-sess -fsd cond -surface fsaverage lh -fwhm 5 -paradigm Fear_Gen_Cond.par -event-related -TR 3 -nconditions 3 -polyfit 4 -spmhrf 0 -refeventdur 6 -analysis cond.sm05.lh -per-run -nskip 4 -stc down
mkanalysis-sess -fsd cond -surface fsaverage rh -fwhm 5 -paradigm Fear_Gen_Cond.par -event-related -TR 3 -nconditions 3 -polyfit 4 -spmhrf 0 -refeventdur 6 -analysis cond.sm05.rh -per-run -nskip 4 -stc down
mkanalysis-sess -fsd cond -mni305 2 -fwhm 5 -paradigm Fear_Gen_Cond.par -event-related -TR 3 -nconditions 3 -polyfit 4 -spmhrf 0 -refeventdur 6 -analysis cond.sm05.mni305 -per-run -nskip 4 -stc down
selxavg3-sess -s amur_dss -df sesspar -analysis cond.sm.lh
selxavg3-sess -s amur_dss -df sesspar -analysis cond.sm.rh
selxavg3-sess -s amur_dss -df sesspar -analysis cond.sm.mni305
Why might we be seeing this activation on the surface map but not the volume one?
Thanks!
Emily