Thank you very much for your patience, douglas.

I just want to create a surface mask. What you said is use mri_annotation2label to create a surface mask. Then when do mri_glmfit analysis on the surface, I need to use the flag --label my surface mask.

If my understanding is wrong, don't hesitate to tell me.

By the way, if I want to do a volume mask, which command do I need to use?

Thanks again.


On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Douglas N Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

Is this an analysis of volume/voxel data or surface/vertex data? If
surface, then you'll need to extract the left insula label from
lh.aparc.annot (use mri_annotation2label), then pass this label to
mri_glmfit with --label

doug


On 01/09/2014 03:52 PM, yaya ya wrote:
> Thanks, Doug.
>
> I just searched the list to find how to generate a mask. Let us say
> the surface of the left insula.
>
> It seems that I need to use mri_mask command and the brain which I use
> to get the mask should be brainmask.mgz in the fsaverage, right?
>
> Then I use this mask in mri_glmfit command.
>
> Any suggstions, feel free to let me know.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Douglas N Greve
> <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:
>
>
>     On 01/09/2014 02:18 PM, yaya ya wrote:
>     > Dear Doug,
>     >
>     > I am sorry. It is my first time to post the message in this way.
>     I am
>     > now used to it:)
>     >
>     > The results from the contrast 0 0 1 -1 did not survive the multiple
>     > comparision corrections. In other words, I guess that it should
>     imply
>     > that I could try DOSS.
>     >
>     > If my thought is wrong, please feel free to let me know.
>     You are correct.
>     >
>     > By the way, is it possible to do SVC (small volume correction) using
>     > an anatomical image from a particular brain region, which is the
>     > conventional way to improve statistical power?
>     You can specify a mask for an ROI when you run mri_glmfit. But that
>     means you have to run your own simulation to do the correction.
>     doug
>
>
>     >
>     > Thanks, again.
>     >
>     >
>     > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Douglas N Greve
>     > <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>     <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     >     Please remember to post to the list. For the 0 0 1 -1 contrast,
>     >     did any results survive multiple comparisons correction? If so,
>     >     then at least the voxels in that region cannot be used with
>     DOSS.
>     >     I'm not sure why the patter was opposite between the two
>     >     contrasts. I could mean that there is a nonlinear relationship
>     >     with age.
>     >
>     >     doug
>     >
>     >
>     >     On 01/09/2014 03:54 AM, yaya ya wrote:
>     >
>     >         Dear Greve,
>     >
>     >         Thank you very much for your response. I am now a little
>     more
>     >         clear, although I still have some further questions.
>     >
>     >         According to your suggestion, I just tried to test whether
>     >         there is a difference between group age. I included age as a
>     >         continuous variable in qdec. After running, I got the
>     results
>     >         arising from the contrast 0 0 1 -1 (which is called does the
>     >         thickness-age correlation differ between two groups?). That
>     >         is, the results revealed the thinner in some brain
>     areas. But
>     >         when I checked the results relating to the comparision of
>     >         groups (1 -1 0 0 ), the results were the same expect the
>     >         opposite pattern. That is, the results became thicker in the
>     >         same region.
>     >
>     >         Does this imply that there is an age effect? It means I
>     could
>     >         not use DOSS to do analysis, right?
>     >
>     >         Best,
>     >         Lickey
>     >
>     >
>     >         On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Douglas N Greve
>     >         <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>     <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
>     >         <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>     >         <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     >             On 01/08/2014 04:28 PM, yaya ya wrote:
>     >             > Dear Freesurfer experts,
>     >             >
>     >             > I have a question about cortical thickness
>     analysis using
>     >             freesurfer.
>     >             > Since I don't know how to post my question in
>     freesurfer
>     >         mailing
>     >             > list,  that is why I am writing to you to get some
>     help.
>     >             Hopefully, my
>     >             > email will not cause you any troubles.
>     >             Thanks for posting to the list.
>     >             >
>     >             > My question is : When I compared thickness from two
>     >         groups (a
>     >             patient
>     >             > group and a healthy contrl group), that is say I
>     got the
>     >         thinner
>     >             in a
>     >             > subdivision of a particular brain region in patients
>     >         than that in
>     >             > controls. But when I added age as a nusiance factors
>     >         (not in the
>     >             > continuous covariate because I want to control for or
>     >         regress
>     >             out the
>     >             > age effect) in qdec, the results changed. In the same
>     >         region,  the
>     >             > thickness became thicker in the patients than that
>     in the
>     >             controls.  I
>     >             > have no idea what happened. Which of them do I need to
>     >         trust?
>     >             The age
>     >             > between two groups has been matched.
>     >             It depends on several things. It might be that there
>     is an
>     >         interaction
>     >             between group and age. Try testing for a difference
>     >         between the age
>     >             slopes of the two groups. If there is no difference,
>     then
>     >         re-run using
>     >             DOSS (DOSS was removed from QDEC so you'll have to
>     create
>     >         an FSGD file
>     >             and use mri_glmfit).
>     >             >
>     >             > In addition, when I do FDR correction on the results,
>     >         the min in the
>     >             > threshold jumped to more than 5 , making all the
>     clusters
>     >             disappear. I
>     >             > think this correction is too high, unabling the
>     genious
>     >         effects to
>     >             > show up. How to deal with it?
>     >             Try using a cluster correction instead of FDR.
>     >             doug
>     >
>     >             >
>     >             > By the way, our lab's IT staffs install the
>     lastest released
>     >             > freesurfer. But when I use the qdec, I could not find
>     >         the option of
>     >             > DODS and DOSS, as discussed in the mailing list. I am
>     >         wondering
>     >             if it
>     >             > has been deleted in this new version.
>     >             >
>     >             > I really appreciate your help in advance.
>     >             >
>     >             > Best,
>     >             > Lickey
>     >             >
>     >             >
>     >             > _______________________________________________
>     >             > Freesurfer mailing list
>     >             > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>     >         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
>     >             <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>     >         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>>
>     >
>     >             >
>     https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>     >
>     >             --
>     >             Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>     >             MGH-NMR Center
>     > greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>     <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
>     >         <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>     >         <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>>
>     >             Phone Number: 617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358>
>     <tel:617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358>>
>     >         <tel:617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358> <tel:617-724-2358
>     <tel:617-724-2358>>>
>     >             Fax: 617-726-7422 <tel:617-726-7422>
>     <tel:617-726-7422 <tel:617-726-7422>> <tel:617-726-7422
>     <tel:617-726-7422>
>     >         <tel:617-726-7422 <tel:617-726-7422>>>
>     >
>     >             Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>     <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting>
>     >         <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting>
>     >             <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting>
>     >             FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
>     > www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>     <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>
>     >
>     <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>
>     >
>     <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>
>     >
>     >             Outgoing:
>     > ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     >             Freesurfer mailing list
>     > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>     >         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
>     >         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>     >         <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>>
>     >
>     > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>     >
>     >
>     >             The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
>     >         person to
>     >             whom it is
>     >             addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
>     >         error and
>     >             the e-mail
>     >             contains patient information, please contact the
>     Partners
>     >             Compliance HelpLine at
>     > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to
>     >             you in error
>     >             but does not contain patient information, please
>     contact the
>     >             sender and properly
>     >             dispose of the e-mail.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     --
>     >     Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>     >     MGH-NMR Center
>     > greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>     <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
>     >     Phone Number: 617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358>
>     <tel:617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358>>
>     >     Fax: 617-726-7422 <tel:617-726-7422> <tel:617-726-7422
>     <tel:617-726-7422>>
>     >
>     >     Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>     <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting>
>     >     <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting>
>     >     FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
>     > www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>     <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>
>     >     <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>
>     >     Outgoing:
>     > ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Freesurfer mailing list
>     > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>     > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>     --
>     Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>     MGH-NMR Center
>     greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>     Phone Number: 617-724-2358
>     Fax: 617-726-7422
>
>     Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
>     Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>     https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer