External Email - Use Caution        

Dear James and FreeSurfer experts,
for lobes average cortical thickness we use this solution MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://github.com/cnnp-lab/CorticalFoldingAnalysisTools, hope it helps!

Best,
Fernanda

Fernanda Hansen P. de Moraes
fernandahmoraes@gmail.com
Doutora em Ciências Médicas |  metaBIO (IF-UFRJ) e Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino

On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 11:35 AM Douglas N. Greve <dgreve@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
I would weight by the number of vertices in each ROI

On 11/8/2022 12:20 PM, James Brown wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution        


Dear Freesurfer experts,
I would like to know if this procedure is correct.
I have cortical thickness data from aparc+aseg for every ROI in DTK atlas (i.e. output of recon-all). I need average cortical thickness in frontal, parietal, temporal, cingulate and occipital lobes. Is it correct to average thickness measurement of every sub lobe roi (e.g. average thickness in frontal lobe = average of: 
  • Superior Frontal
  • Rostral and Caudal Middle Frontal
  • Pars Opercularis, Pars Triangularis, and Pars Orbitalis
  • Lateral and Medial Orbitofrontal
  • Precentral
  • Paracentral
  • Frontal Pole
and so on for other lobes... 

Do we need to correct for the number of vertices in every region when we measure the lobar average thickness?

Alternatively, do I need to run these commands to generate lobes then measure thickness in every lobe?
# mri_annotation2label --subject subject --hemi lh --lobesStrict lobes
# mri_annotation2label --subject subject --hemi rh --lobesStrict lobes
# mri_aparc2aseg --s subject --labelwm --hypo-as-wm --rip-unknown \
#   --volmask --o wmparc.lobes.mgz --ctxseg aparc+aseg.mgz \
#   --annot lobes --base-offset 200 [--base-offset must be last arg]

Thank you
James

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline <MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .


--
Fernanda Hansen P. de Moraes

Doutora em Ciências Médicas | Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino e metaBIO (IF-UFRJ)