Hi Bruce,<br>I am running version 5.10<br>Thanks,<br>-Eric<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Bruce Fischl <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" target="_blank">fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Eric<br>
<br>
what version are you running?<br>
Bruce<div><div class="h5"><br>
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Eric Cunningham wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Greetings,<br>
<br>
I am trying to determine how bad a talairach.xfm registration has to be to<br>
warrant a manual edit.  I have found that even minor edits can have<br>
noticable (9%) effects on major subcortical volumes (such as thalamus or<br>
hippocampus).  Very few registrations seem to have completely failed, but<br>
most seem like they could be made better by a tweak here or there.  At what<br>
point would I just be adding randomness by manually editing?<br>
<br>
About what percent of a given dataset would you expect to manually edit?<br>
<br>
Much appreciated,<br>
-Eric Cunningham<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br></div></div>
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is<br>
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail<br>
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at<br>
<a href="http://www.partners.org/complianceline" target="_blank">http://www.partners.org/<u></u>complianceline</a> . If the e-mail was sent to you in error<br>
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly<br>
dispose of the e-mail.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>