External Email - Use Caution
A] I am running mri_gtmpvc on our data and need to extract stats data that is in the similar format as gtm.stats.dat file from non-pvc corrected PET data, in the sense getting mean regional uptake from non-pvc PET data alongside region
names, volumes, var, etc information using ROIs from gtmseg.
- >
looks like it is only different in the first or second decimal place, is that right? If so, then it is acceptable.
Yes, that’s correct its different in the first/second place. Just for understanding, why would we expect these differences?
Not, sure if other previous questions were received so reposting them:
B] Also, when we turn off PVC with “--psf 0 --no-tfe” flags, SGTM is still performed right whose regional data is saved in gtm.stats.dat file? If we perform RBV PVC does it in addition affect in anyway SGTM outputs (i.e gtm.stats.dat)?
C] Is there a way to erode only reference region in the mri_gtmpvc command both when PVC is performed (SGTM or RBV) and with no PVC? If not, is there a way to do so after running mri_gtmpvc to rescale PVC’ed and non-PVC’ed uptake with eroded
cerebellum derived from gtmseg? I have extracted eroded GM cerebellum from gtmseg using mri_binarize and then planning to use that eroded GM cerebellum mask to rescale PVC’ed/non-PVC’ed regional uptake, not sure if it is the right approach.
mri_binarize command:
mri_binarize --i ${FreeSurferDir}/mri/gtmseg.mgz --o CerebellumGrayMatterMaskEroded_gtmseg.mgz --match 8 47 --erode 2
Thank you,
Sneha
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
On Behalf Of Douglas N. Greve
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 6:25 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Freesurfer] petsurfer questions - No PVC stats file in the similar format as gtm.stats.dat
looks like it is only different in the first or second decimal place, is that right? If so, then it is acceptable. On 8/22/2024 4: 11 PM, Sneha Pandya wrote: External
Email - Use Caution Dear team, A] I am running mri_gtmpvc on our data and need
looks like it is only different in the first or second decimal place, is that right? If so, then it is acceptable.
On 8/22/2024 4:11 PM, Sneha Pandya wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Dear team,
A] I am running mri_gtmpvc on our data and need to extract stats data that is in the similar format as gtm.stats.dat file from non-pvc corrected PET data, in the sense getting mean regional uptake from non-pvc PET data alongside region names, volumes, var, etc information using ROIs from gtmseg.
mri_gtmpvc command (turned off PVC):
mri_gtmpvc --i PET.nii.gz --reg PET_to_nu.reg.lta --seg ${ FreeSurferDir }/mri/gtmseg.mgz --default-seg-merge --auto-mask ${FWHM} .01 --psf 0 --no-tfe --no-rescale --save-input --o nopvcoutput
I tried this with following approaches as suggested in the forum:
1] mri_convert nopvc.nii.gz --ascii nopvc_1.stats.dat
2] mri_segstats --i input.nii.gz --seg aux/seg.nii.gz --ctab aux/seg.ctab --excludeid 0 --sum nopvc_2.stats.dat
On comparing mean uptake between nopvc_1.stats.dat and nopvc_2.stats.dat, I see that values are similar but not same. Is this expected?
Head of nopvc_1.stats.dat:
54832.960938
65543.554688
59080.023438
75662.140625
47840.519531
61120.222656
66590.773438
69356.742188
58847.007812
65715.578125
Head of nopvc_2.stats.dat:
Index
SegId
NVoxels
Volume_mm3
StructName
Mean
StdDev
Min
Max
Range
1
2
106905
223886.7
Left-Cerebral-White-Matter
54832.95
8839.049
15160.92
96317.77
81156.85
2
7
7723
16174
Left-Cerebellum-White-Matter
65543.57
10289.78
26951.39
90987.36
64035.97
3
8
24806
51950.2
Left-Cerebellum-Cortex
59079.91
14349.17
13388.75
107889.7
94500.95
4
10
3427
7177
Left-Thalamus
75662.06
13054.39
33599.36
105854.3
72254.89
5
11
1813
3796.9
Left-Caudate
47840.52
10624.56
19515.38
88224.69
68709.31
6
12
2280
4774.9
Left-Putamen
61120.21
8453.317
43591.13
83701.97
40110.84
7
13
976
2044
Left-Pallidum
66590.77
5816.431
50056.58
83431.62
33375.04
8
16
6686
14002.2
Brain-Stem
69356.77
16951.96
20199.62
115301.7
95102.11
B] Also, when we turn off PVC with “--psf 0 --no-tfe” flags, SGTM is still performed right whose regional data is saved in gtm.stats.dat file? If we perform RBV PVC does it in addition affect in anyway SGTM outputs (i.e gtm.stats.dat)?
C] Is there a way to erode only reference region in the mri_gtmpvc command both when PVC is performed (SGTM or RBV) and with no PVC? If not, is there a way to do so after running mri_gtmpvc to rescale PVC’ed and non-PVC’ed uptake with eroded cerebellum derived from gtmseg? I have extracted eroded GM cerebellum from gtmseg using mri_binarize and then planning to use that eroded GM cerebellum mask to rescale PVC’ed/non-PVC’ed regional uptake, not sure if it is the right approach.
mri_binarize command:
mri_binarize --i ${FreeSurferDir}/mri/gtmseg.mgz --o CerebellumGrayMatterMaskEroded_gtmseg.mgz --match 8 47 --erode 2
Thank you,
Sneha
_______________________________________________Freesurfer mailing listFreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduMailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "urldefense.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer