Thank you for your prompt answer - the command worked. This is the atlas mentioned: http://atlas.brainnetome.org/brainnetome.html

What is approximately the smallest possible segment when using PVC?

Also, does the exclusion of extracerebral structures harm? I used that flag because it complained:

gtmseg --s XYZ --o BN.gtmseg.mgz --ctx-annot BN_Atlas.annot --ctab '/media/XYZ/BN_Atlas_freesurfer/BN_Atlas_246_LUT.txt'
ERROR: /media/subjects/XYZ/mri/apas+head.mgz exists. This is ok
but you must indicate whether to use what is there (--no-xcerseg)
or create a new one and overwrite what is there (--xcerseg)
or specify your own headseg (--head)

and did not want to override my apas+head.mgz

Thanks,

Boris

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 4:44 PM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <DGREVE@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

I don't know what the Brainnetome is, but it looks like you have it in
annotation form. I think that command should work. Why are you using
--no-xcerseg? This will cause it to not include extracerebral
structures. Also note that you cannot use arbitrarily small segments
when doing PVC.

On 8/13/19 10:26 AM, Boris Rauchmann wrote:
>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Dear all,
>
> my intention is to use the Brainnetome Atlas parcellation/segmentation
> in PETSurfer to obtain PVC corrected SUVRs for the atlas ROIs. I used:
>
> gtmseg --s XYZ --o BN.gtmseg.mgz --ctx-annot BN_Atlas.annot --ctab
> '/media/XYZ/BN_Atlas_freesurfer/BN_Atlas_246_LUT.txt' --no-xcerseg
>
> Is this the right approach to obtain a high resolution segmentation to
> run PVC methods?
>
> Thanks,
> Boris
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer