CORRECTING DEFECT 45 (vertices=24, convex hull=53, v0=135114)
After retessellation of defect 45 (v0=135114), euler #=96 (83072,238273,155297) : difference with theory (-19) = -115
CORRECTING DEFECT 46 (vertices=97, convex hull=30, v0=136402)
After retessellation of defect 46 (v0=136402), euler #=97 (83078,238301,155320) : difference with theory (-18) = -115
CORRECTING DEFECT 47 (vertices=74, convex hull=24, v0=138982)
After retessellation of defect 47 (v0=138982), euler #=98 (83088,238338,155348) : difference with theory (-17) = -115
CORRECTING DEFECT 48 (vertices=83, convex hull=55, v0=139717)
After retessellation of defect 48 (v0=139717), euler #=99 (83098,238391,155392) : difference with theory (-16) = -115
CORRECTING DEFECT 49 (vertices=141431, convex hull=17606, v0=149662)
(2)Because of the above mistakes, I haven't tried the next step yet.